debunker09 Posted July 21, 2009 #26 Share Posted July 21, 2009 I have to disagree, sorry, but seriously whose to say that the guy sees something thats out of the ordinary grabs his camera, starts filming it and then is spotted by the creature, chased and... your right, but whats with the scene at the truck, then the man chopping wood? It's not like the camera is panning between these scenes, it's been deliberately edited! Who edits the footage of someone being killed to incorperate these random activities?? It is deeply suspicious in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma wrapped in a puzzle Posted July 21, 2009 #27 Share Posted July 21, 2009 your right, but whats with the scene at the truck, then the man chopping wood? It's not like the camera is panning between these scenes, it's been deliberately edited! Who edits the footage of someone being killed to incorperate these random activities?? It is deeply suspicious in my book. The camera that was used is a manual winding camera capable of up to two minutes of recording before needing to be wound. So the different segments are obviously in between the windings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePitOfReason Posted July 24, 2009 #28 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Well I watched it about 100 more times. The animal running part is pretty real and it looks like to me someone just threw the camera down and made a trail out of there. This film could have even been filmed in Africa or anywhere else a large ape like creature could have been found in the woods like this. But the teeth and the eye part I feel are fake. The footage was bad enough and that camera filming inside the animals mouth like that would have been very dark. And the eye was much to clear and in focus for this camera that close up. Who knows maybe a Zoo Keeper made the film and it took a few seconds to figure out the animal was not in the mood to be in a movie. I would have ran much faster than they did. It wouldn't have taken me that long to figure out that thing runs faster than a man. The back legs flip up a little like a ram or a goat. The front legs seem very much larger than the back in bulk not length. And the head is pointed unlike a bears and much smaller than a bears. I have been in the woods and seen bears come and go and even seen a few run and none run like this creature. I also do wildlife control for a living. I say ape like animal is real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
She-ra Posted July 24, 2009 #29 Share Posted July 24, 2009 (edited) High Quality Here is a higher quality version. Hopefully the link works Here is another interesting video: Mysterious Planet- Gable Film And an interesting link to almost entire video: The Gable Film Enjoy Edited July 24, 2009 by She-ra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odds Posted July 25, 2009 #30 Share Posted July 25, 2009 I have been pretty interested in this film since seeing it for the first time a few days ago, but am unfortunetly going to call hoax for the time being. Or at least call hoax on the last part of it. I hadnt noticed this myself untill i had it pointed out to me via another frame by frame video on youtube seen . It's the very last part of the film where the creatures teeth are shown. When slowed down it seems to show what looks to be wire meshing around the jaw, as if a dog or some other creature has its mouth through a hole in its enclosure, trying to bite the camera which has been put near its face. Take a look and let me know what you think. The rest of the film though, if a hoax, seems quite well done to me. The way the creature moves does not seem physically possible to me to be done by a man in a suit. When it starts to move sideways, it moves almost ape or gorrila like.. While running though, to me, it seems more large predatory cat than dog. And i dont see much likeness to a bear there at all. The stance and movements to me just dont seem to match up. In fact it doesnt seem to match any of the animals listed, but perhaps that is because of the low quality of the video. As for the second gable film, to me that one seems alot more likely to be a complete hoax. The reason being, that on the victim there seems to be no defensive wounds visible on the arms, which is obviously just a natural defensive tactic we use when being attacked to prevent damage to our face and vital organs.. And even though he/she would have been running away from the animal with their back to the animal, there seems to be no holes torn in the shirt, no gashes or blood, etc.. As for the lack of blood around the corpse, you could argue it was torn in half and then dragged to another spot by the creature, yet if that were so i would be inclined to believe the intestines would not be in a neat pile below the body, but more spread out as the victim was dragged. These are just my thoughts on what i have seen so so far, one way or another, a very interesting video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikki Hearts Posted August 1, 2009 #31 Share Posted August 1, 2009 I thought it was a bear at first, but once it started moving.....I don't know.o.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now