Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Implantable micro chip in Obama's Healthcare


bc56

Recommended Posts

 
  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • acidhead

    18

  • Neognosis

    14

  • Mattshark

    13

  • bc56

    7

Top Posters In This Topic

I didnt read the whole thread, I just have one question, does the bill really say in any way shape or form, anything about a implantable chip?

No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but unlike a little chip (which can only store data), you can very easily be tracked through it.

Not if you disable, de-solder, or remove the gps module. :tu:

However, data can still be traced across the network, albeit with far less accuracy though.

Edited by SpiderCyde
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not if you disable, de-solder, or remove the gps module. :tu:

You can be tracked by triangulation from masts, most phones don't have GPS (which is a receiver only anyway)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention our internet connections and credit card transactions.

All your personal information, locations, and what your doing is up on Facebook and Twitter anyways :D

Edited by Cadetak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt read the whole thread, I just have one question, does the bill really say in any way shape or form, anything about a implantable chip?

Read my initial post on the first page. The relevant section is about establishing a National Medical Registry--all Class III and some Class II (including anything implantable) medical devices in use have to be registered. Again, see my post for the FDA's definitions of these terms ("Class II," "implantable," etc). It isn't a conspiracy nor is it sinister.

‘National Medical Device Registry

‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that--

‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and

‘(B ) is--

‘(i) a class III device; or

‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.

That's it. That's the only reference made in the bill. Nothing about requiring people to get chips or even about giving anyone a chip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.