preacherman76 Posted September 1, 2009 #76 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Maybe someone could post the exact wording on the part concerning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattshark Posted September 1, 2009 #77 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I didnt read the whole thread, I just have one question, does the bill really say in any way shape or form, anything about a implantable chip? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoIverine Posted September 1, 2009 #78 Share Posted September 1, 2009 (edited) Yes but unlike a little chip (which can only store data), you can very easily be tracked through it. Not if you disable, de-solder, or remove the gps module. However, data can still be traced across the network, albeit with far less accuracy though. Edited September 1, 2009 by SpiderCyde Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattshark Posted September 1, 2009 #79 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Not if you disable, de-solder, or remove the gps module. You can be tracked by triangulation from masts, most phones don't have GPS (which is a receiver only anyway) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadetak Posted September 1, 2009 #80 Share Posted September 1, 2009 (edited) Not to mention our internet connections and credit card transactions. All your personal information, locations, and what your doing is up on Facebook and Twitter anyways Edited September 1, 2009 by Cadetak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt_Ripley Posted September 1, 2009 #81 Share Posted September 1, 2009 ah the paranoia machine still hard at work cranking out crap I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Startraveler Posted September 1, 2009 #82 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I didnt read the whole thread, I just have one question, does the bill really say in any way shape or form, anything about a implantable chip? Read my initial post on the first page. The relevant section is about establishing a National Medical Registry--all Class III and some Class II (including anything implantable) medical devices in use have to be registered. Again, see my post for the FDA's definitions of these terms ("Class II," "implantable," etc). It isn't a conspiracy nor is it sinister. ‘National Medical Device Registry ‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that-- ‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘(B ) is-- ‘(i) a class III device; or ‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining. That's it. That's the only reference made in the bill. Nothing about requiring people to get chips or even about giving anyone a chip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now