Lord Harry Posted January 15, 2018 #251 Share Posted January 15, 2018 (edited) Reluctantly deleted out of concern for Cabal security. Cranks do frequent these parts after all... Edited January 15, 2018 by Lord Harry 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted January 15, 2018 #252 Share Posted January 15, 2018 4 hours ago, Lord Harry said: Reluctantly deleted out of concern for Cabal security. Cranks do frequent these parts after all... Nevertheless I saw the original post before you deleted it. The Cabal wants to know because it is bored and curious: PM me with the name of the forum in question so I can be entertained, too. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted January 15, 2018 #253 Share Posted January 15, 2018 5 hours ago, Lord Harry said: Reluctantly deleted out of concern for Cabal security. Cranks do frequent these parts after all... Send it to me too. I lack entertainment. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted January 15, 2018 #254 Share Posted January 15, 2018 Pm it it here also. I enjoy reading innovative assertions that may topple the Orthodoxy's house of cards. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted January 15, 2018 #255 Share Posted January 15, 2018 See what you started, Lord Harry? You're spreading the fringe. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted January 16, 2018 #256 Share Posted January 16, 2018 11 hours ago, kmt_sesh said: See what you started, Lord Harry? You're spreading the fringe. I'm going to poke around in there. Might be fun if there are any Frank Colin followers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harte Posted January 16, 2018 #257 Share Posted January 16, 2018 Somebody link me to this hotbed of irrationality. (I'm probably already registered there LOL.) Harte 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted January 16, 2018 #258 Share Posted January 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Harte said: Somebody link me to this hotbed of irrationality. (I'm probably already registered there LOL.) Harte Get yourself some migraine glasses. My head is thumping from that place..... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted January 16, 2018 #259 Share Posted January 16, 2018 Ach. So much interest in the fringe. To keep poor Lord Harry from sending the link to everyone at UM, I'll just go ahead and say it. It's just the Graham Hancock forum. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swede Posted January 16, 2018 #260 Share Posted January 16, 2018 8 hours ago, Piney said: I'm going to poke around in there. Might be fun if there are any Frank Colin followers. Yoiks! Caution, lest you incite the Burrow's Cave contingent. . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted January 16, 2018 #261 Share Posted January 16, 2018 4 minutes ago, Swede said: Yoiks! Caution, lest you incite the Burrow's Cave contingent. . Oh, dear, that Burrow's Cave falderal. I live in Chicago and thought I had to go to my museums to see ancient Egypt stuff. I could just go to the cave and see it without display cases! Really, how on earth do people think this stuff is real? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swede Posted January 16, 2018 #262 Share Posted January 16, 2018 12 minutes ago, kmt_sesh said: Oh, dear, that Burrow's Cave falderal. I live in Chicago and thought I had to go to my museums to see ancient Egypt stuff. I could just go to the cave and see it without display cases! Really, how on earth do people think this stuff is real? Heavens. How can one dispute the authenticity of genuine gold-painted lead artifacts, replete with wholly inaccurate glyphs? Such cynicism. And the apparently non-existent cave should not at all influence one's evaluation. . 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harte Posted January 16, 2018 #263 Share Posted January 16, 2018 2 hours ago, kmt_sesh said: Ach. So much interest in the fringe. To keep poor Lord Harry from sending the link to everyone at UM, I'll just go ahead and say it. It's just the Graham Hancock forum. Awww... nevermind. I'm there often. Hoped it was some new batch of idiocy. Harte 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted January 16, 2018 #264 Share Posted January 16, 2018 17 minutes ago, Harte said: Awww... nevermind. I'm there often. Hoped it was some new batch of idiocy. Harte A new bit of idiocy would be a refreshing change of pace from the recycled stuff. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted January 16, 2018 #265 Share Posted January 16, 2018 3 hours ago, Swede said: Yoiks! Caution, lest you incite the Burrow's Cave contingent. . There is a guy posting about Clovis tombs and shrines. He has anger issues too. You know I must Uncle. He's just asking for it..... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swede Posted January 16, 2018 #266 Share Posted January 16, 2018 31 minutes ago, Piney said: There is a guy posting about Clovis tombs and shrines. He has anger issues too. You know I must Uncle. He's just asking for it..... Indeed... So be it. Blessings granted. Let the smiting commence. As always, show mercy when possible. . 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted January 17, 2018 #267 Share Posted January 17, 2018 21 minutes ago, Swede said: show mercy when possible. . Not anymore..... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted January 18, 2018 #268 Share Posted January 18, 2018 23 hours ago, Piney said: Not anymore..... Are you actually posting there? There's too much woo there, even for me, and I'm a Moderator here. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted January 18, 2018 #269 Share Posted January 18, 2018 22 minutes ago, kmt_sesh said: Are you actually posting there? There's too much woo there, even for me, and I'm a Moderator here. Or you are unable to refute their assertions with the failed talking points handed down from the oligarchy of Academia to it's lickspittle shills. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted January 18, 2018 #270 Share Posted January 18, 2018 27 minutes ago, Jarocal said: Or you are unable to refute their assertions with the failed talking points handed down from the oligarchy of Academia to it's lickspittle shills. Now, now. We're talking about the fringe here. You know, the population whose collective IQ is seven. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted January 18, 2018 #271 Share Posted January 18, 2018 45 minutes ago, kmt_sesh said: Now, now. We're talking about the fringe here. You know, the population whose collective IQ is seven. Generous to a fault, aren’t you? cormac 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Harry Posted January 18, 2018 #272 Share Posted January 18, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, kmt_sesh said: Now, now. We're talking about the fringe here. You know, the population whose collective IQ is seven. One of them even had the tenacity to question my Egyptological credentials when I pointed out that Herodotus's reference to "20 years" was irrelevant to Egyptologists determining how long it took to build the Great Pyramid. And that was coming from someone who defended von Daniken's ludicrous claim that it would have taken the Egyptians 600 years using Bronze Age technology to build the Great Pyramid! A few of them...ahem...Cladking...even claimed it would be impossible to cut through limestone using copper tools. LOL! Edited January 18, 2018 by Lord Harry 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Harry Posted January 18, 2018 #273 Share Posted January 18, 2018 (edited) Apparently only the super duper farting geysers were capable of quarrying stone. Edited January 18, 2018 by Lord Harry 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted January 18, 2018 #274 Share Posted January 18, 2018 1 hour ago, Lord Harry said: One of them even had the tenacity to question my Egyptological credentials when I pointed out that Herodotus's reference to "20 years" was irrelevant to Egyptologists determining how long it took to build the Great Pyramid. And that was coming from someone who defended von Daniken's ludicrous claim that it would have taken the Egyptians 600 years using Bronze Age technology to build the Great Pyramid! A few of them...ahem...Cladking...even claimed it would be impossible to cut through limestone using copper tools. LOL! That's a common failing of the fringe. They really do not understand research protocols or methodology, and yet they seem to entertain notions that they know how historians think. This guy named Herodotus wrote a bunch of stuff around 450 BCE, so that must be where Egyptologists derive all of their knowledge. Yeah, and today's physicians derive their knowledge from medieval medical literature. That's how it works, right? Simple minds. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crystal sage Posted January 18, 2018 #275 Share Posted January 18, 2018 (edited) Just watching this at the moment ... thought I would share.. Quote It is brilliant.. an ancient Peruvian link to New Zealand !!! and the Red Headed link to New Zealand... ( to do with the RH negative blood groups too..) note .. will coincide with the Spanish Basques !!!! http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-ideas/adventure/photos-emerge-of-incredible-easter-island-discovery/news-story/10740beb630cd8d75b89f3dc477b3ec9 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/polynesia-genius-navigators.html http://users.on.net/~mkfenn/page5.htm Quote The following genetic information gives us a fairly clear picture of the genetic connections in the Pacific region, which shows that Polynesians left S.E. Asia 11,500 years ago and departed from the Taiwan area 6000 years ago. They spent 3,800years in Alaska/Canada before travelling South West to Hawai'i 2,200 years ago (genetics and family genealogies confirm this figure) and eventually south to Tahiti about 1,400 years ago and then on to New Zealand about 1,000 years ago (The last two figures are yet to be verified from Tahitian and Maori genealogies). Geneticists have found that Polynesians do share a common male ancestor (Y chromozome) 11,500 years ago, with the short, dark frizzy haired New Guinea highlanders - genes from the ancient pygmy tribes that once populated the planet over 100,000 years ago. Significant populations of these people can still be found amongst the Andaman islanders and the Negritos of the Phillippines. Polynesians ceased contact with these people 11,500 years ago and to even the layman, their physical characteristics clearly show that they have evolved quite separately. Edited January 18, 2018 by crystal sage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now