Moon Monkey Posted December 31, 2009 #26 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Then you are a fraud and a hypocrite, they have no raw data so how can you accept their claim without looking at that. There is only one bs-er here monkey. The one of use who has fundamentally ignored every piece of evidence given to him, the one of us who tries to make a claim with a plain graph of raw data (something which you wouldn't do in the first year of university). Oh actually they are. I have given you papers saying that exact thing. You just won't except them so unless you do it yourself you can do one. They have the equations they use, you can use the equations to conduct your own calculations...they do not rely on anything not contained within their text for their results. You have not once presented anything that contains the logarithmic relationship you claim exists bewteen the CO2 and deutrium data...whether it is raw or otherwise is unimportant and irrelevent and simply an attempt to go off at a tangent and avoid answering the simple question: where...is....the...logarithmic...relationship...you...claim...explains...the....trends ? (I don't believe it exists) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now