Eldorado Posted January 19, 2010 #251 Share Posted January 19, 2010 There seems to be a pattern with US Presidents. Republicans are disliked for being dumb and a bit facist. (Bush Jr and Reagan spring to mind) Democrats are disliked for being liars that can't keep their peckers in their pants. (Clinton & Kennedy spring to mind) Tis very strange........ (All UK politicians are dumb, facist, lying adulterers....I think those faults are seen as qualifications for the job) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AROCES Posted January 19, 2010 #252 Share Posted January 19, 2010 We don't want to be president though. Before you consider yourself in Palin's intelligence level, shouldn't you accomplish more than just naming the founding fathers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldorado Posted January 19, 2010 #253 Share Posted January 19, 2010 I'm neutral with regard to US politics, but I have to state the obvious here. To become Governer of your state requires an above average intelligence and hard work. To be seriously considered as a Presidential candidate requires a lot more. Thats a fact....like it or not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theGhost_and_theDarkness Posted January 19, 2010 #254 Share Posted January 19, 2010 Before you consider yourself in Palin's intelligence level, shouldn't you accomplish more than just naming the founding fathers? My definition of achievement and yours might differ just a tad. And I would NEVER consider myself in Palin's intelligence level. If I'm going to take such an insult, its not going to be from myself! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimi81 Posted January 20, 2010 #255 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Reading the spelling and grammar in this thread, for some to laugh at Palin's alleged lack of intelligence is a bit like the pot calling the kettle black. Whut eva du youe meen suh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siara Posted January 20, 2010 #256 Share Posted January 20, 2010 You guys are screwing up this whole section with this Palin crap. How many threads do we need on her? We need a Sarah Palin subsection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preacherman76 Posted January 20, 2010 #257 Share Posted January 20, 2010 We need a Sarah Palin subsection. LOL, my goodness wouldnt that suck? Least Id be able to avoid these threads though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimi81 Posted January 20, 2010 #258 Share Posted January 20, 2010 (edited) LOL, my goodness wouldnt that suck? Least Id be able to avoid these threads though. I have to agree, they are getting a bit tiresome and redundant. Most people think she's an incompitent ditz, and a select few thinks she's the second coming, and the Republican Party saviour. Round and round we go . I don't think anyones minds are going to change on the subject and as long as she isn't in a position of any power or influence over me I don't really give a damn what she's doing Edited January 20, 2010 by Kim81 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preacherman76 Posted January 20, 2010 #259 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I have to agree, they are getting a bit tiresome and redundant. Most people think she's an incompitent ditz, and a select few thinks she's the second coming, and the Republican Party saviour. Round and round we go . I don't think anyones minds are going to change on the subject and as long as she isn't in a position of any power or influence over me I don't really give a damn what she's doing True that. As soon as Sara starts giving my money to banksters, or continuing unjust war, thats when I will care about whats going on with Sara. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AROCES Posted January 20, 2010 #260 Share Posted January 20, 2010 You are so funny So answer this honestly, if this interviw was given to Obama and he coulndn't name any of the Founding Fathers of the Country he attempted to be Commander in Chief of what would you say....honestly? Suprised and find it funny, but not see him as stupid, dumb and sudddenly be disqualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preacherman76 Posted January 20, 2010 #261 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Wait a sec, people honestly believe she cant name a single founding father? Just cause she replyed "all of them"? Come on guys, I know you hate her and all, but thats absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+susieice Posted January 21, 2010 #262 Share Posted January 21, 2010 Wait a sec, people honestly believe she cant name a single founding father? Just cause she replyed "all of them"? Come on guys, I know you hate her and all, but thats absurd. Not really. Asking someone about the founding fathers is a pretty generic question to ask an American. Most people can give a few names and accomplishments as to why we refer to them as that. They may not get it all right, but they aren't running for VP nor do they have people running around praising them for their intelligence and ability to lead a nation. Skirting the question and then coping out with Washington, seemingly with Glen Beck's help, is what's absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudo Intellectual Posted January 21, 2010 #263 Share Posted January 21, 2010 Yeah. How unbelievable! She actually likes all the founding fathers? That's impossible! What a stupid beauty-queen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+susieice Posted January 21, 2010 #264 Share Posted January 21, 2010 Yeah. How unbelievable! She actually likes all the founding fathers? That's impossible! What a stupid beauty-queen. Don't we all. We can even discuss them and take some of that phoney pride you put in the other thread in what they accomplished. However, I still don't think she's the candidate you think she is. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudo Intellectual Posted January 21, 2010 #265 Share Posted January 21, 2010 That's fine, susie, because I'm not interested in your opinion. Yes, I know, this sounds mean, but we're all adults here and this is simply an Internet forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverCougar Posted January 21, 2010 #266 Share Posted January 21, 2010 (edited) It's one thing about the founding fathers... It's another about not knowing why there's a North and South Korea.. Edited January 21, 2010 by SilverCougar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudo Intellectual Posted January 21, 2010 #267 Share Posted January 21, 2010 Schmidt is a lying piece of ****, Silver. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/75601-palin-blasts-critics-in-fox-debut-a-bunch-of-bs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverCougar Posted January 21, 2010 #268 Share Posted January 21, 2010 mmhm.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now