DC09 Posted June 21, 2004 #1 Share Posted June 21, 2004 TEHRAN, Iran - Iran confiscated three British military vessels Monday and arrested eight armed crew members, state television reported. The three British ships entered Iranian territorial waters not far from the Iran-Iraq border, the Arabic language Al-Alam television reported. "Iranian forces confiscated the ships and eight military personnel on board," the report said. The television report said crew members were carrying maps and weapons. It also said the ships were confiscated at about 11 a.m. between the Bahmanshir and Arvand rivers, which would put them in the Shatt-al-Arab waterway east of the Iraqi city of Faw. The broadcast gave no further details. In London, the Ministry of Defense said it was investigating the report but did not know if it was true. The ministry said there were no British warships operating in the Shatt-al-Arab waterway but some smaller vessels were there. "We are assisting the Iraqi water police there so it may be one of those vessels," a spokesman said on condition of anonymity. "We don't know." The Foreign Office said British diplomats in Tehran had been in contact with the Iranian government but it was still unclear what had happened. Iranian-British relations have been strained in recent days, since London helped draft a resolution at the International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors meeting last week in Vienna that rebuked Iran for past nuclear cover-ups. Iran accused Britain of caving in to U.S. pressure. Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenris Posted June 21, 2004 #2 Share Posted June 21, 2004 They wheren't ships, they where small patrol boats who apparently had strayed over into Iranian waters (We have personell over in the area training Iraqies so they can mount their own coastgards etc.) Doesn't look like its going to be a big deal, its expected the men will be handed over once its clear they where not on some sort of covert mission. Map reading and navigation courses needed for all of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stamford Posted June 21, 2004 #3 Share Posted June 21, 2004 Doesn't look like its going to be a big deal, its expected the men will be handed over once its clear they where not on some sort of covert mission. That's of course as long as they wern't SBS on a mission, in which case there could be some problems. Fingers crossed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenris Posted June 21, 2004 #4 Share Posted June 21, 2004 That's of course as long as they wern't SBS on a mission, in which case there could be some problems. Fingers crossed. I'd think that very unlikely at this point in time, there will probably be some feet dragging and political one-upmanship put I expect this storm in a teacup to be resolved within a day or two at most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lottie Posted June 21, 2004 #5 Share Posted June 21, 2004 Lets hope so. There are British Troops on the South Iraq boarder at the moment would that not cause some tension? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunarmdscissor Posted June 22, 2004 #6 Share Posted June 22, 2004 It looks like fenris is right , theyve started saber rattling , talking about how they are gonna charge the troops. However i doubt they have the balls to take on the coalition face first, its one thing making politically threatenin statements and an entirely other arresting trrops that are parrt of the most powerful coalition on the planet. Hopefully just a storm in a teacup as fenris says. If they attempt to charge them i say we go in an get em. After theyre shenanigans at the embassy in London time to give em some of their own medicine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babs Posted June 23, 2004 #7 Share Posted June 23, 2004 This is upsetting. Those fellas look scared. BTW, I am confused wun: If they attempt to charge them i say we go in and get em. Aren't you against this sort of thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunarmdscissor Posted June 24, 2004 #8 Share Posted June 24, 2004 LOL no you just havent bothered to read any of my previous posts on the war. You have believed me to be an anti-war liberal , no matter what i say to the contrary. because i have a far more broadminded apporaoch to the situation means it make it impossible for me to treat every situation in black and white. I postsed that i was firmly behind the war before it started. Im not goin to go into the details. Just read my posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gollum Posted June 24, 2004 #9 Share Posted June 24, 2004 It was reported today that the soldiers have been released without charge and are on there way home. As for the whereabouts of there boats, I've no idea. Looks like Iran now have a naval fleet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stamford Posted June 25, 2004 #10 Share Posted June 25, 2004 Looks like Iran now have a naval fleet. I think we can spare them It's good to know that they are being freed, but I never thought anything too serious was going to happen to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liutas Posted June 25, 2004 #11 Share Posted June 25, 2004 In many respects I am not surprised. Iran were bound to weant to draw a line in the sand at some point. There has been a lot of talk about Iran and the war on terror. This has been as good a demonstration as any that the Iranians wish to both retain their 'independence' but are also willing to co-operate with the international community that has black listed them for so long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bathory Posted June 26, 2004 #12 Share Posted June 26, 2004 This has been as good a demonstration as any that the Iranians wish to both retain their 'independence' but are also willing to co-operate with the international community that has black listed them for so long. you mean just like them telling the UN to p*** off when it comes to nukes:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babs Posted June 26, 2004 #13 Share Posted June 26, 2004 I don't want Iraq to have a fleet of anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stamford Posted June 28, 2004 #14 Share Posted June 28, 2004 I don't want Iraq to have a fleet of anything. I doubt that a couple of boats that are little more than dingys are going to be too much of a worry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gollum Posted June 28, 2004 #15 Share Posted June 28, 2004 (edited) I don't want Iraq to have a fleet of anything. Babs, honey, I think you will find that it is Iran that has the boats and not Iraq. And what Stamford says is right, they are merely dingys and used only for patrolling large rivers and lakes. If they were intending on using them to mount a Naval attack..... in your own words I'd say "bring it on". Edited June 28, 2004 by gollum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babs Posted June 28, 2004 #16 Share Posted June 28, 2004 I must have Iraq on the brain You know, I thought I heard it was a few small boats, but when you said 'fleet', I got a little concerned. I see, it was humorous, now. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now