Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

More water at Giza


cladking

Recommended Posts

That is a very interesting read. Couple things...

A steel pipe at 3.5 inches can move about 200 gallons a minute. So for 35,000 gallons that would be 175 minutes, or just under 3 hours. If we assume that the flow is no where near what a steel pipe can provide, say 25 gallons a minute, then we still only have a fill time of 24 hours. The pipe would do just fine. It actually is Overkill.

Did you look at the pic of Tank 2? It looks like a big stone lined grave. Like 5 feet deep, 10 feet long and 5 feet wide. The estimate they give for this "tank" is actually 8,000 gallons. The 35,000 gallons is if the whole pit with the tank about 3 feet down, which is much wider and longer, but appears to be made of sandstone, or perhaps packed earth, was to be filled. Which I don't think it could, as the input pipe looks to be only about 3 or 4 inches above the stone block tank.

I don't think this indicates a gully washing event. The creek by my parents house is small enough to step across, yet moves tens of thousands of gallons per hour. A decent rain, collected right, once a year, might fill the stone lined tank. Though it is more likely, as stated in the article, that they simply went to a canal, or the river several times a month to get water to fill it up.

I don't pretend to know what's going on here. I don't believe even an

expert can determine what was here by just the footprints of structures

but he'd have a better idea than me. But it seems simply absurd that they

wouldn't capture the water from rain events. The Great Pyramid still had

an intact water collection device surrounding it so rain coming down from

it would even be clean by today's standards. A 1 1/2" pipe seems to prove

that they weren't trying to catch rain. Since water runs off very quickly

in the desert this is ample evidence they weren't trying to catch it.

I'm also quite leery of the concept that these people would consume only two

liters per day. I don't believe hygiene, cooking, and drinking purposes

could possibly use so little water. They also had to clean and tend animals

and probably plants.

They could have hauled water up from wells but we need to get rid of the idea

that they drank river water. This seems highly implausible they'd drink the

warm, muddy, stagnant, and schistosomiasis laden water that flowed in river

and this goes double for the backwater that probably was near the pyramid.

There was always the cool effervescent "water like perrier" only a few hundred

feet away in the Osiris Shaft they could have used and there were most prob-

ably other places to tap this exact same water even closer. Indeed, it seems

that a small fill pipe might imply the water was flowing by all the time and

the retention basin filled whenever a little more was removed from it. If the

water flowed all the time then there was some unknown water source right up

on top of the Giza Plateau. It seems a virtual certainty that any water source

was the cool effervescent water that they called Osiris or a reasonable facsimile

of same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A 1 1/2" pipe seems to prove that they weren't trying to catch rain. Since water runs off very quickly in the desert this is ample evidence they weren't trying to catch it.

The pipe would work fine. As long as there was a ditch system to collect the water.

I'm also quite leery of the concept that these people would consume only two liters per day. I don't believe hygiene, cooking, and drinking purposes could possibly use so little water. They also had to clean and tend animals and probably plants.

I believe it is not unreasonable. Current populations in arid conditions in north Africa still use very little water. They find alternate methods to cooking and hygiene. You're probably right though that they would likely need more water, but multiple water sources were just a walk away.

They could have hauled water up from wells but we need to get rid of the idea that they drank river water. This seems highly implausible they'd drink the warm, muddy, stagnant, and schistosomiasis laden water that flowed in river and this goes double for the backwater that probably was near the pyramid.

Don't know why we should throw out that idea. Near a Billion Hindus in India drink directly from the various rivers there, they also bath, water their animals and toss their dead into the same warm muddy water. I don't know why the Egyptians would care. Leave the water to sit for a half hour and the silt settles out. They likely had to drink warm water anyway.

There was always the cool effervescent "water like perrier" only a few hundred feet away in the Osiris Shaft they could have used and there were most probably other places to tap this exact same water even closer. Indeed, it seems that a small fill pipe might imply the water was flowing by all the time and the retention basin filled whenever a little more was removed from it. If the water flowed all the time then there was some unknown water source right up on top of the Giza Plateau. It seems a virtual certainty that any water source was the cool effervescent water that they called Osiris or a reasonable facsimile of same.

I think if there was water coming down from the plateau that there would be more evidence of water diverting constructions. If it existed in Greek or Roman times it would have been tapped with a aquaduct. If it existed in Old Kingdom, then you would think that there would have been a huge population center based there, to take advantage of clean, cool, fresh water that appeared in large quantities. Also I think we would see a cave, or fountain head that would be the source, but AFAIK, no fountainhead location has been scientifically or archeologically located.

Giza was a necropolis for hundreds or a thousand years before the GPs were built, right? Perhaps you're actually looking for a Spiritual River? Maybe water was not heaped up on the Giza plateau, but miracales and blessings were found there. Osiris's Attention and Hand was strong there. But spiritualism does not life stone or water, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pipe would work fine. As long as there was a ditch system to collect the water.

Yes. The ditch would have to have as much capacity as the resevoir though.

I believe it is not unreasonable. Current populations in arid conditions in north Africa still use very little water. They find alternate methods to cooking and hygiene. You're probably right though that they would likely need more water, but multiple water sources were just a walk away.

I don't know. I do know that a man doing hard work even in cool weather can

perspire as much as about seven liters per day.

Don't know why we should throw out that idea. Near a Billion Hindus in India drink directly from the various rivers there, they also bath, water their animals and toss their dead into the same warm muddy water.

I had to look this one up. You're right that people are bathing etc in the

river. It's said that outsiders will get sick and even die if they do this.

I have to guess that the Nile was much worse. The water is warmer and mud-

dier. It spends much of it's course at lower elevations than the Ganges.

You're probably right that people were drinking from it though.

Be this as it may it still isn't likely that anyone ever referred to this

water as cool and effervescent or said it tossed on the Giza Plateau.

I think if there was water coming down from the plateau that there would be more evidence of water diverting constructions.

The water failed shortly after the completion of G2 apparently. It pro-

bably didn't fail suddenly and completely. Each year it just lost more and

more of its vigor and sprayed for a shorter and shorter time. They added

more and more natron to it to get less and less water to come up.

"His name lives on account of natron-offerings and he is divine."

If it existed in Greek or Roman times it would have been tapped with a aquaduct.

I doubt any water at all came up by about 2300BC because CO2 levels were far

too low.

If it existed in Old Kingdom, then you would think that there would have been a huge population center based there, to take advantage of clean, cool, fresh water that appeared in large quantities.

This water was used but mostly it was used to grow crops during the peak grow-

ing season.

Also I think we would see a cave, or fountain head that would be the source, but AFAIK, no fountainhead location has been scientifically or archeologically located.

In September of 2009 Hawass said there are no caves at Giza and he knows everything

there is to know about Giza. This is despite the numerous known caves and fissures

all through the plateau which was named "Mouth of Caves" by the pyramid builders.

You won't find something you aren't looking for. Even after being led into the cave

at the tomb of the birds he is still not excavating these caves. The source was 10'

north of G1 and 35' to the east. It's still there.

Giza was a necropolis for hundreds or a thousand years before the GPs were built, right?

No, not really.

The ancients stuck bodies almost everywhere in the deserts but the top of the plateau

was almost barren landscape except for anything that might be sitting under G1 or G2.

Perhaps you're actually looking for a Spiritual River? Maybe water was not heaped up on the Giza plateau, but miracales and blessings were found there. Osiris's Attention and Hand was strong there. But spiritualism does not life stone or water, no?

Yes, perhaps.

But we're still left with real physical evidence that there was water on the plateau

and it was used to lift stones. We're still left without answers to how it was built

and no one is looking for answers.

We're left with a status quo that just creates mysteries instead of answering questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. The ditch would have to have as much capacity as the resevoir though.

Should not have been a problem. given the near 1/4 km length of each side, and that the ditch was not directly against the side, it would only have to be inches deep to be effective. At least on the uphillside. On the downhill side, it would have had to have been a little larger.

I don't know. I do know that a man doing hard work even in cool weather can

perspire as much as about seven liters per day.

That is true, but we don't know that these people were using this for everyday use or for hard labor. If people only work in the cooler times and seasons, and relax most of the hottest hours, they can get by on 2 to 3 liters per day.

The water failed shortly after the completion of G2 apparently. It pro-

bably didn't fail suddenly and completely. Each year it just lost more and

more of its vigor and sprayed for a shorter and shorter time. They added

more and more natron to it to get less and less water to come up.

"His name lives on account of natron-offerings and he is divine."

Ahh... interesting.

In September of 2009 Hawass said there are no caves at Giza and he knows everything

there is to know about Giza. This is despite the numerous known caves and fissures

all through the plateau which was named "Mouth of Caves" by the pyramid builders.

You won't find something you aren't looking for. Even after being led into the cave

at the tomb of the birds he is still not excavating these caves. The source was 10'

north of G1 and 35' to the east. It's still there.

I'd like to see a video exploration of those caves, if they exist. Hawass isn't going to be doing anything anymore now is he. Did he leave the country? Or just government?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see a video exploration of those caves, if they exist. Hawass isn't going to be doing anything anymore now is he. Did he leave the country? Or just government?

He's back in charge.

Of course he wasn't doing much before either except looking for ramps. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's back in charge.

Of course he wasn't doing much before either except looking for ramps. ;)

Don't tell me you are still harping on those three cavelets claiming that there is a gigantic man made network under Giza, even your pal Colins keeps his mouth shut about that after been proven as wrong as wrong can be.. lately he suddenly acquired "other interests" .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't tell me you are still harping on those three cavelets claiming that there is a gigantic man made network under Giza, even your pal Colins keeps his mouth shut about that after been proven as wrong as wrong can be.. lately he suddenly acquired "other interests" .

I don't really know what's under Giza since Hawass won't go look. Oh sure, I

know there are the caves and the massive man made passages connected to at least

one of them but that's it. I don't know if they are all connected or if water

erosion shows up anywhere other than the Osiris Shaft.

I don't have any idea what Andrew Collins is up to since Hawass just sealed off

the cave leading to G2 without excavating it or ever even retracting the statement

that there are no caves at Giza (the Mouth of Caves), but he was never "proven

wrong". There is a cave exactly where Collins reported and it has been sealed

so we'll never know anything more about it. Hawass et al knows everything so why

go out and try to learn anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really know what's under Giza since Hawass won't go look. Oh sure, I

know there are the caves and the massive man made passages connected to at least

one of them but that's it. I don't know if they are all connected or if water

erosion shows up anywhere other than the Osiris Shaft.

I don't have any idea what Andrew Collins is up to since Hawass just sealed off

the cave leading to G2 without excavating it or ever even retracting the statement

that there are no caves at Giza (the Mouth of Caves), but he was never "proven

wrong". There is a cave exactly where Collins reported and it has been sealed

so we'll never know anything more about it. Hawass et al knows everything so why

go out and try to learn anything.

They don't search?

http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/secretchambers2.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you but the link only provided a site search function.

I really don't know how much searching has been done under here but keep

in mind that the cave at the tomb of the birds was wide open that anyone

could walk in for at least 75 years. Hawass actually is investigating a

cave in the Osiris Shaft which is rather surprising in light of his claim

that there are no caves at Giza.

Most people around this area are reportedly deathly afraid of caves.

To look for caves you have to seek eviodence that they exist. It's not

merely a matter of walking around looking for holes in the ground. The

Edgar Brothers have even published photos of caves just east of G1. I've

found dozens of caves using nothing but google on the plateau but Hawass

still said there are no caves.

Why should anyone be surprised that there are caves at a place whose old-

est name was "Mouth of Caves".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you but the link only provided a site search function.

I really don't know how much searching has been done under here but keep

in mind that the cave at the tomb of the birds was wide open that anyone

could walk in for at least 75 years. Hawass actually is investigating a

cave in the Osiris Shaft which is rather surprising in light of his claim

that there are no caves at Giza.

Most people around this area are reportedly deathly afraid of caves.

To look for caves you have to seek eviodence that they exist. It's not

merely a matter of walking around looking for holes in the ground. The

Edgar Brothers have even published photos of caves just east of G1. I've

found dozens of caves using nothing but google on the plateau but Hawass

still said there are no caves.

Why should anyone be surprised that there are caves at a place whose old-

est name was "Mouth of Caves".

AS usual throwing half truths around. There are a lot of caves and cavelets on Giza. In fact it would be very surprising if there were none in a limestone formation. But most of these are hardly big enough to serve as burial chamber and all of them have been charted, including the North Cliff one your pal Colins made his sensationalistic video in (that looked more like some hide and go seek with a green filter).

And as to the link, seems that the databank of Tour Egypt is down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as to the link, seems that the databank of Tour Egypt is down.

Thanks. I'll try it again later.

AS usual throwing half truths around. There are a lot of caves and cavelets on Giza. In fact it would be very surprising if there were none in a limestone formation. But most of these are hardly big enough to serve as burial chamber and all of them have been charted, including the North Cliff one your pal Colins made his sensationalistic video in (that looked more like some hide and go seek with a green filter).

I was swayed by the grainy films made by Collins simply because

I usually believe people who are reporting things if they have no

axe to grind and it's too easy to prove them wrong. Very few peo-

ple are actually liars though obviously we can all make all sorts

of errors. This simply wasn't the type of error to which people are

prone and he did provide the photographic evidence (poor as it was).

Since then Dr Hawass has literally been led by the hand into this

cave yet he has not rettracted the statement that there are no caves

at the Mouth of Caves. He appeared on international television (BBC,

I believe) inside this cave. This was in September of 2010.

The north cliff face where the counterweight operated was built on

fill since apparently it had the wrong shape. This is only yards

away from the NE corner of G1 and is evidenced not only by the yel-

low colored fill but also by the fact there is a canal leading to

it and it's exactly 300' in lenght which is the distance that the

stones moved toward the pyramid at a time.

The "ramp fragment" that people seem to think proves they used ramps

to lift stones on the pyramid is actually in a perfect N/ S line with

the second cliff face counterweight which also connects to Campbells

so called tomb.

In other words the ramp fragment a far distant from G1 actually is

suggestive that they used counterweights to lift the stone. Counter-

weights are consistent with the vertical lines in the pyramid and

the common sense method to lift stone on a steep slope. They are

also entirely consistent with the literal meaning of what the build-

ers actually said and the titles of the workers who built the pyra-

mids.

There's no question that counterweights were used and they employed

water for ballast. The real question is what process caused the water

to be on the plateau. For all I know aliens levitated the water.

Why not just excavate the cave and see where it leads. Even if one

must believe in debunked ramps it seems he'd be interested in where a

cave under the pyramids leads. If the builders called this place the

Mouth of Caves then logically they knew about the caves and might have

put something in them or alterred them in some way.

"Men bury themselves, the Gods fly up".

How is it possible that people don't care about facts and the builders

of the Great Pyramid?

This is much like a nightmare.

Edited by cladking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it possible that people don't care about facts and the builders

of the Great Pyramid?

Well, if we speak about facts you should ask yourself that question looking at a mirror. Maybe you get a better answer from yourself than I do get from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He's back in charge.

Of course he wasn't doing much before either except looking for ramps. ;)

I had not heard that. Thought maybe he had done a little pillaging and ran off to Europe.

I really don't know how much searching has been done under here but keep

in mind that the cave at the tomb of the birds was wide open that anyone

could walk in for at least 75 years. Hawass actually is investigating a

cave in the Osiris Shaft which is rather surprising in light of his claim

that there are no caves at Giza.

It is interesting that they gated off those tombs/caves. My first opinion was it was because those are historic tombs and homeless people appeared to be either camping there, or locals were using it for storing trash. Collin's video clearly showed the place full of trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is much like a nightmare.

a nightmare where the story hasn't changed from its inception, yes I have those, the way out is to revise your opinion in the light of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. maybe you could try it.

:tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Where to start, where to start.

I've just finished reading the Coffin Texts for the first time. I had mistakingly believed these were

not relevant and written in modern language. Many are modern language but even they sometimes

contain important elements to understanding the Pyramid Texts. There's huge confirmation of the

concept that there was water at Giza and it says so over and over though people have chosen to

interpret what it says to mean something entirely different.

The ancients simply didn't talk like we do. They couldn't say that osiris was a cool effervescent column

of water that sprayed from the earth on the Giza Plateau directly because their language 0placed the

meaning in context so a sentence like this would breal every rule of grammar and be unintelligible. But

still they said there was water at Giza in almost every way imaginable. My favorite due to its accuracy

is "spell" # 317 where they say the Nile god's shape is in the sky and he sweetens the caverns on the

horizon. Egyptologists have mistranslated this concept because the ancients mistakingly believed that

the water on the horizon (Giza) came from Elephantine Island. That the "Eye of Horus" is the opening

through which the water sprays is a little better expressed in the CT than the PT;

"Cold water. Oh, Osiris this cold water of yours Osiris which went forth to the Great One, which went forth

to Horus.". (this statement was made when the subject was the Eye of Horus)

"...who gave abundance to the lord of Flood on the desert plateau; who gave offerrings. Open a path for

the inert one to the abode of embalming, the pillared bark; may you open it for me, for I am Osiris; I have

come to Rosteau..."

"Abundance" is a mistranslation as previously shown and is the "verb" for "geyser". It is "3gb" which is "the

violent inundation that causes abundance". But it specifically states that the flood is Osiris on the desert

plateau known as "Rosteau" (Giza) and this inudation is named "Osiris" just as is said in the pT.

#314 "....concealing the mysteries of the deep place in Rosteau."

#571 "To build a mansion among the water"... ... " that their pools are dug and trees planted, while Seker

belongs to Rosteau...".

#665 "the northerners are for the great levy of Rosteau".

#1035 "I have passed over the paths of Rosteau, whether on water or on land..."

#1080 "This is the sealed thing which is in darkness, with fire about it, which contains the efflux of Osiris

and it is put in Rosteau; it has been hidden since it fell from him, and it is what came down from him onto

the desert of sand; it means that what belonged to him was put in Rosteau.

...And the last words of the Coffin Texts? "THE WAYS BY WATER WHICH BELONG TO ROSTEAU"

Rosteau gets little mention in the PT because the PT was used solely in Rosteau and everyone already

knew where they were. They were at the place of Atum in the Eye of Horus. But the Coffin Texts were used

all over Egypt so when they spoke of things that needed to be identified as to place they specifically said

"Rosteau".

The evidence boith physical and textual that there was water at Giza is simply overwhelming.

The Coffin Texts has explained many concepts in the PT that were opaque to me because they were used

only a few times. This makes the PT nearly an open book to me now. I'm expecting a great deal of new

material and new understanding in the near future. There's quite a bit about the fire-pan which isn't overly

surprising since this device gained great importance as time went by. I willbe updating the "tri-lobed disc"

thread as soon as I can get it all sorted out. I really need to get the thread started on how they built the

pyramid. I've actually done most of the drawings and can get them uploaded but now I'm hoping to get

Dr Bui's permission to use the gravimetric scan with the five step overlay before starting it. I believe the

evidence will start pouring in and swamp any resistance. It will be exciting to see all the data and ideas

that can spring from this once itr becomes accepted.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Things written in modern language tend to be lousy with errors. Most of the ancient

language translated into modern language is incomprehensible. Here is some very

interesting material from the book of the dead that appears to be very very well trans-

lated from ancient texts.

...and never failing gods give unto him [to eat] of the tree of life of which they themselves do eat that he likewise may live."[4] The bread which he eats never decays and his beer never grows stale.[5] He eats of the "bread of eternity" and drinks of the "beer of everlastingness" which the gods eat and drink;[6] and he nourishes himself upon that bread which the Eye of Horus has shed upon the branches of the olive tree.[7] He suffers neither hunger nor thirst like the gods Shu and Tefnut, for he is filled with the bread of wheat of which Horus himself has eaten; and the four children of Horus, Hapi, Tuamautef, Qebhsennuf and Amset, have appeased the hunger of his belly and the thirst of his lips.[8] He abhors the hunger which he cannot satisfy, and he loathes the thirst which he cannot slake;[9] but he is delivered from the power of those who would steal away his food.[10] He is washed clean, and his ka is washed clean, and they eat bread together for ever.[11] He is one of the four children of Horus who live on right and truth,[12] and they give him his portion of the food with which they have been so abundantly supplied by the god Seb that they have never yet known what it is to hunger. He goes round about heaven even as they do, and he partakes of their food of figs and wine.[13]

http://www.sacred-texts.com/egy/ebod/ebod05.htm

"Olive tree" is almost certainly a mistranslation of "sycamore fig". "Truth" normally means "balance".

Don't say I never gave you anything.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Very interesting .... thanks cladking

this bit...

#1080 "This is the sealed thing which is in darkness, with fire about it, which contains the efflux of Osiris

and it is put in Rosteau; it has been hidden since it fell from him, and it is what came down from him onto

the desert of sand; it means that what belonged to him was put in Rosteau.

I'm pondering.....Ark of the Covenant, in the '''sarcophagus''' of the Great Pyramid (it's a good fit)

Containing Ormus / MFKZT......(the efflux of Osiris)

Creating some kind of (superconducting?) (light) energy...

That could have been dispersed via underground water?...somehow... maybe?....to other locations.

By way of ley lines, ancient monuments, standing stones...

In a nut shell....Ancient Technology.....based on light and water.

just a thought.... :)

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about it, everything now becomes clear. There must have been a hot geyser at Giza because the water was needed to fill the sarcophagus bath in the King's chamber. So, one mystery solved, now to find the containers for seeds and stuff, the microwave transmitter and the death ray. I never knew pyramidology could be so exciting, but now I have seen the light, Weeeeeeeeeee!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pondering.....Ark of the Covenant, in the '''sarcophagus''' of the Great Pyramid (it's a good fit)

Containing Ormus / MFKZT......(the efflux of Osiris)

Creating some kind of (superconducting?) (light) energy...

That could have been dispersed via underground water?...somehow... maybe?....to other locations.

By way of ley lines, ancient monuments, standing stones...

In a nut shell....Ancient Technology.....based on light and water.

just a thought.... :)

I just don't know. Most people (including my detractors) would be quite surprised by how

shallow the depth of my knowledge is. I do get increasingly confident that almost everything

that was written in ancient times has some basis in fact and this would apply even to what's

in the Bible. That there was an arc is highly likely and it was quite likely at least tangentally

related to the pyramid. It's apparent that the great pyramids were very important in ancient

times.

The ancients had no modern science of which to speak and this is certain because modern

science and technology can not arise in a vacuum. If they had science then it was either brought

in by aliens or it was a different kind of science based on observation and logic instead of ob-

servation and experiment. I can only barely begin to redevelop an ancient science based only on

my own knowledge and the tidbits that can be deduced from the scraps and fragments that sur-

vive of their culture.

If they had a superconductor they might well have understood its nature. Electrical phenomena

are not that advanced and appear in nature. They are mentioned specifically in the PT so they

were not wholly ignorant. There is some speculation that fossilized gold (mfkzt) is a supercon-

ductor and they might have even known this if it stayed charged for hours or days after a lighting

strike. But I'm always asking myself how they could gain practical benefits of such knowledge

and what evidence exists that they were aware oif such benefits. We gain knowledge for the sake

of gaining knowledge but without the practical benefits like predictive capabilities we'd give it up

in short order. If fixed gold actually has an effect on beetles and people is it through a sort of

"super conductivity" or does it affect the destruction of aging less directly.

Sun and water were among the best understood by the ancient Egyptians, probably. They had

a good appreciation for light though I can't think of any means for them to accurately determine its

speed that isn't somewhat contrived. I believe they had a wildly inaccurate estimate of its speed

(~ 120,000 MPH).

Someday maybe we'll use 20th century science at Giza and discover the actual facts, no matter

what they might be. Don't hold your breath.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about it, everything now becomes clear. There must have been a hot geyser at Giza because the water was needed to fill the sarcophagus bath in the King's chamber. So, one mystery solved, now to find the containers for seeds and stuff, the microwave transmitter and the death ray. I never knew pyramidology could be so exciting, but now I have seen the light, Weeeeeeeeeee!

Red and blue pyramids were for hot and cold running geysers after all. :whistle:

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

. But I'm always asking myself how they could gain practical benefits of such knowledge

and what evidence exists that they were aware oif such benefits. We gain knowledge for the sake

of gaining knowledge but without the practical benefits like predictive capabilities we'd give it up

in short order.

Thanks for your thoughtful reply cladking....

I agree totally with what you have said above..

That's why I was pondering on the Great Pyramid being part of a kind of Ancient Power Grid...

like the power grids we have now...but using a different kind of energy....transmitted in a different way..

energy that could have been used for light and heating and for communication..?

(and on top of this, maybe also for more 'spiritual' applications...?)

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your thoughtful reply cladking....

I agree totally with what you have said above..

That's why I was pondering on the Great Pyramid being part of a kind of Ancient Power Grid...

like the power grids we have now...but using a different kind of energy....transmitted in a different way..

energy that could have been used for light and heating and for communication..?

(and on top of this, maybe also for more 'spiritual' applications...?)

.

I refer you to "The Giza Power Plant" by Christopher Dunn, published in 1998 and widely available. I quote from part of the synopsis on the back cover

In a brilliant piece of reverse engineering based on twenty years pf research, Dunn reveals that the Great Pyramid of Giza was actually a large acoustical device! By it's size and dimensions, this crystal device created a harmonic resonance with the Earth and converted Earth's vibrational energies to microwave radiation

And my own brief synopsis.

In the book it is explained, in great detail and at great lenght, that the Grand gallery of the Great Pyramid is packed with Helmholtz resonators, and that there is a hydrogen generator within the Great Pyramid, and that is the cause of the salt crystals being found in the Queen's chamber. He further explains that the shafts are actually the atenuation system for the microwave radiation generated within the pyramid, and this radiation is transmitted to a satellite in geosychronous orbit above Egypt that acts as a relay to beam the microwave energy back down to the receivers at various locations around Egypt, to power their electrical equipement. Though exactly what electrical equipment the Ancient Egyptians had is left rather vague, probably because over the millenia it has all corroded away to dust. Though he says that they did have van de graaff generators, as shown in images at Dendera. He says that the Eye of Horus is a representation of the satellite, as the satellite is not as our modern ones, but is optical and refracts the microwave energy to beam it back down to Earth, the shape of the wadjet eye mirroring the shape of the satellite.

Edited by Kaa-Tzik
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.