Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Seahorses' body shape explained


Still Waters

Recommended Posts

The strange and beautiful seahorse has fascinated people for centuries.

And scientists now say they understand why this unusual fish evolved its equine-like head and S-shape.

A study published in the journal Nature Communications has shown that, compared to straight-bodied pipefish from which they evolved, seahorses are able to strike at more distant prey.

The team concludes that the seahorses' delicate curves evolved to help it hunt and feed.

Both seahorse and pipefish feed on tiny marine creatures, striking at them and sucking them into their snouts.

arrow3.gifRead more...

:wub: lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • user107026

    18

  • Copasetic

    8

  • Still Waters

    4

  • aquatus1

    3

I like the yellow ones.....:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the yellow ones.....:)

Me too :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THERE IS NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT THE SEAHORSE EVOLVED FROM A PIPEFISH ONLY AN ATHIEST WHO'S TRYING TO KEEP HIS JOB FROM CRUMBLING BEFORE HIS EYES WOULD MAKE SUCH A LUDIGROUS AND ABSURD CLAIM THE SEAHORSE CAME INTO BEING A SEAHORSE PERFECT DESIGNS DONT HAPPEN BY ACCIDENT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa, keep it down ey. No need to go all capital-y, looks like an S shaped pipe fish to me. Just sayin'

Edited by draconis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

tell me what you imagine to be evidence?

Evidence is a objective way of testing of a theory or a hypothesis so that it can be reproduced by others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its stunning the way evolution has transformed a pipefish into the seahorse. The truths that science constantly uncover never cease to amaze me. I wish Charles Darwin was still alive.

Edited by Evilution13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its stunning the way evolution has transformed a pipefish into the seahorse. The truths that science constantly uncover never cease to amaze me. I wish Charles Darwin was still alive.

just like darwin evolution was dead years ago lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

worm porn helps shed light on evolution of sperm was today's science news these guys are fighting to maintain there jobs lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its stunning the way evolution has transformed a pipefish into the seahorse. The truths that science constantly uncover never cease to amaze me. I wish Charles Darwin was still alive.

how has dumbolution transformed a pipefish into the seahorse? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how has dumbolution transformed a pipefish into the seahorse? lol

I believe the answer is: a gradual adaptation to geographically isolated ecological niches. Kind of like the way the first christian church has EVOLVED into all of its varied modern manifestations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how has dumbolution transformed a pipefish into the seahorse? lol

The same way a virus mutates yearly to render one season's flu vaccine ineffective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

worm porn helps shed light on evolution of sperm was today's science news these guys are fighting to maintain there jobs lol

?? You do realize that evolutionary biology is an applied science as well right? Ergo, lots people in applied science fields use tenets of the modern synthesis everyday in their day jobs....

just like darwin evolution was dead years ago lol

I know User, you claim to be a doctor (as played on TV?), so you should probably realize "Darwinian evolution" just describes natural selection, which is a theory that explains how the biological fact of evolution occurs. There is of course, much more to modern evolutionary theory than just what Darwin surmised (in deed, he was wrong about some things) and that amassed amount of knowledge we call the modern synthesis. Likewise I'd expect that you know that the modern synthesis is anything but 'dead years ago' and is the foundation of modern biology. Certainly Dr. Dobzhansky wasn't pulling everyone's leg when he said; "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" as it really is a unifying theory.

Knowing you, as a doctor, surely already know all this, we'll forgive the tongue-and-cheek sarcasm ;)

how has dumbolution transformed a pipefish into the seahorse? lol

Mayhap you should venture to read the paper? Being a doctor and all, I am sure you are already familiar with how the scientific endeavor of journals work and I shan't have to explain this to one such as yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?? You do realize that evolutionary biology is an applied science as well right? Ergo, lots people in applied science fields use tenets of the modern synthesis everyday in their day jobs....

I know User, you claim to be a doctor (as played on TV?), so you should probably realize "Darwinian evolution" just describes natural selection, which is a theory that explains how the biological fact of evolution occurs. There is of course, much more to modern evolutionary theory than just what Darwin surmised (in deed, he was wrong about some things) and that amassed amount of knowledge we call the modern synthesis. Likewise I'd expect that you know that the modern synthesis is anything but 'dead years ago' and is the foundation of modern biology. Certainly Dr. Dobzhansky wasn't pulling everyone's leg when he said; "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" as it really is a unifying theory.

Knowing you, as a doctor, surely already know all this, we'll forgive the tongue-and-cheek sarcasm ;)

Mayhap you should venture to read the paper? Being a doctor and all, I am sure you are already familiar with how the scientific endeavor of journals work and I shan't have to explain this to one such as yourself.

it's amazing 100 years of this "theory" and they still have no clue to the origins of the eye,ear,nose,mouth,tongue,hair,neck,shoulders,arms,legs,fingers,feet,nails,claws,teeth,muscle,heart,lungs and all the other stuff i left out lol they cant ignore these things forever

Edited by user107026
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's amazing 100 years of this "theory" and they still have no clue to the origins of the eye,ear,nose,mouth,tongue,hair,neck,shoulders,arms,legs,fingers,feet,nails,claws,teeth,muscle,heart,lungs and all the other stuff i left out lol they cant ignore these things forever

You really have absolutely no idea what you are talking about do you?

Being a doctor you are familiar with how to search scientific literature correct? The answers you seek lay within.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just the way natures constantly evolving and changing including all the living things, yes its facinating. Makes me think that its God himself whos behind all these processes of nature. Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's no Dr. That's a hack. No actual doctor could disbelieve evolution at all. Or biology. I smell a phony.

Animals couldn't be related at all outside of evolution. . . relation is GENETIC. Genetics are the driving force behind evolution.

My guess, the Seahorse was a pipefish that got caught in a famine and adapted to use less energy to hunt. Ergo, ambush predator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's no Dr. That's a hack. No actual doctor could disbelieve evolution at all. Or biology. I smell a phony.

Animals couldn't be related at all outside of evolution. . . relation is GENETIC. Genetics are the driving force behind evolution.

My guess, the Seahorse was a pipefish that got caught in a famine and adapted to use less energy to hunt. Ergo, ambush predator

if we were living in alice in wonderland we'd find a pipefish changing into a seahorse lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we were living in alice in wonderland we'd find a pipefish changing into a seahorse lol

You should meet Dunning and Kruger;

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled people make poor decisions and reach erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to appreciate their mistakes.[1] The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their ability as above average, much higher than it actually is, while the highly skilled underrate their own abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority. This leads to the situation in which less competent people rate their own ability higher than more competent people. It also explains why actual competence may weaken self-confidence. Competent individuals falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding. "Thus, the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others."[2]

Are you going to add anything to the discussion or support any of your claims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.