Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Syrian people Support Their President


Knight Of Shadows
 Share

Recommended Posts

no no i didn't say i don't support the opposition

in matter of fact i Did said that i no longer support the goverment

acts on civilians and violence will never work

but i merely state i refuse any form of western interfernce

" Especially from USA "

what i said is the me among many other syrians are having fears

that when and if a new goverment formed from the oppositions

they'll become puppets for the western influence

which would put us syrians to shame forever

which i explained reasons for such fears that usa financed " some "

of those oppositions groups

and what you said about lebanon example would be actually " logically "

if it wasn't the usa we're talking about

but looking back at the usa history on the matter the history

does not favor the usa side given their delightful history

usa has always been a country that lives off leeching off other countries

so based on logic conclusion and history this is the results

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  • Replies 410
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Corp

    43

  • Knight Of Shadows

    146

  • MichaelW

    45

  • dekker87

    35

Acutally before the Second World War the US didn't have much influence in world politics. It wasn't until the turn of the twentith century that they tried to actively build an empire. Really the history of the US is no different than any other empire or major nation in world history.

Have the opposition groups given you any indication that they plan to massively change Syrian foreign policy? Other than taking much needed money from the one group that was offering it? Because it kind of sounds like scare tactics. Don't support the opposition groups, they'll turn you into western puppets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it not different ?

does it make sense the the country fighting iran on every step for not having nuclear

is the only country who ever used such country ? little common sense ? :lol:

it's very much different and certinaly more colorful with red colors

the oppositions which is still blank no main leader for them

no one to speak on their behalf or such

still it's unknown clearly what they exactly know

although i feel they want their lost dignitiy and honor

they lost through security forces treat to them as animals

and for long being slaves to the goverment or goverment againts bully them

you see for example a person's father going back home

during a protests that father swept along arrested or tortured or shot

the sons of that father are next to rise .. one of the sons ..

the whole family rise to protests the family falls their friends rise

on and on and violence will only make protests more and more

that's been proved

that's the main demands of their requests no more fear

now they do not show hate for such ethnic group or religion etc etc

they also don't show any desire for different foreign policy

as matter of fact those foreign policies are the main reason

many people are not protesting

there was however on tv of some arabic new channels

some hints and claim during calls calling for the usa to step in

to help the people and stuff like that

also there has been two " saudis " channels broadcasting

syrian protests news for most of the day in weird way

what i mean by weird is like encouraging way to make it look like

it's ok to kill security forces or syrian army

you know all about motivating materials also it's mixed with

a strict islamic comments .. or even fatwas to premit the killing

of army or security forces or even going on to jihad by doing so

all in all i believe i posted the two sides of the story

without being sided with anyone " hopefully "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you didn't even read the post do make that judgement did you ?

then i better not reply to your stupidity if you fail to finish a post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you didn't even read the post do make that judgement did you ?

then i better not reply to your stupidity if you fail to finish a post

I gave up at "you see, Americans don't know except what they want them to know". It's not stupidity. I just can't be arsed telling you how wrong you are when it comes to that particular fact.

Most Americans don't know anything. Period. What gives you the impression that media clowns such as Fox News would be the agent of government propoganda? They have their own agenda. Half of them haven't heard of Syria and I doubt very many of them could actually point it out on a map.

I'll give you an example. A Fox News report on protests in Egypt placed that country where Iraq is. And this is supposedly "brainwashing" the Americans. If that's the case, you haven't got anything to complain about. At least I know where Syria is. And it's capital. And it's President. And it's currency (I'm assuming you still use the Syrian Pound).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

had you actually went on further in the post

you'd see i clearly support those protests

and i think what they're doing is noble in refusing to submit

to being treated in such savage way

and i also dislike the brutal way those protests were met

however am offering two sides of things not one

and the possiablity of outside interfernce of " parts " of those

protests to turn them in it's own advantages

and you may know few things about syria but i doubt you'd know

the same as i know about it

and yes most of people now calling bashar terrorist or bad man

they never have heard of syria before the actions

but suddenly they were given bad person to throw flames at

and as stupid they are they just do it just coz it was presented

to them that way .. well am not like that

i analyize things before showing certain result

and let me tell you the stupidity of people calling president bashar things

i tell you know the president is powerless to what's happening

the president did not give the orders to shoot people in daraa

it's kind of internal affairs which outsiders couldn't possiably know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it not different ?

does it make sense the the country fighting iran on every step for not having nuclear

is the only country who ever used such country ? little common sense ? :lol:

it's very much different and certinaly more colorful with red colors

So a country wants to limit the power and influence of a rival. There's nothing special about that. In fact it's standard practice in international politics and has been going on for thousands of years.

that's the main demands of their requests no more fear

now they do not show hate for such ethnic group or religion etc etc

they also don't show any desire for different foreign policy

as matter of fact those foreign policies are the main reason

many people are not protesting

So does that mean people are putting foreign policy above internal policy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's something like that for many people including people i know

but personally i started to disagree with that

if you wanna make good policy on the outside at least first

treat your people with more respect and answer their demands

i think the best thing is balance between foreign policy and internal

policy that's the best thing there is

we can have the same foreign policy with better internal policy

that hold more respect for people and that people can actually

talk without having this much of violence in return

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that outlook. While foreign policy is important (one didn't vote for a party because they policy amounted to giving people hugs) I think how a government treats its own people is far more important. Once you have a system in place the benefits the citizens of a nation and keeps them safe and happy, they you should look at forming relationships with other nations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

despite the previous mistakes of banning the news resources and media

from entering syria .. the latest the army as many have heard had

interveine in " Geser Al Sogor " a town belong to Edleeb in syria

due to the claiming there's terrorists in the area

however i have to give it up for syrian army about this one

they taken along with them many of the news channels reporter

both arabic and western news channel reporters and cameras

to let the world see the truth ..

now what's interesting is that the arabic news channels that has

criticized syria for not letting independent news channels to go in

" did not agree to go with the army "

for stupid reasons not worth of mentioning

however the mission carried on without them but still include many

western - arabic - syrian news reporters and camera to give facts

well the report says when the military entered the area

there was attempt to blow the press reporters bus by denmaites

which was failed by the army

afterward the armed gang opend fire " on the press bus " to be exact

but they were surpressed by the army

few were caught from the gangs and others were killed

however the armed gangs escaped to a closeby area

the army in presuade .. so i'll update when more news come

.. personally i think it's good step that syrian army

took news reporters and cameras from both arabic and non-arabic

news sources to make the world see it ? don't you agree ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.