Dino drawing or mud stain: proof of creation?

[surfed]

those bible basher folks are getting desperate to back up their believes.

[ShadowSot]

Uhh..that looks very suspicous - like photoshopped.

Doubt it's shopped, but look at the other drawings around it. They have tinting on them, which leads me to believe that's caused by age. The dinosaur is in sharp contrast to those images, and appears to be made over them. It also looks like none of the marks continue through it.

It looks like someone used bleach or something similar to make the image.

[Mattshark]

Humans are so narrow minded, viewing things, cultures, events, unexplained phenomenon through the veil of their current understanding of reality.

If it IS a dinosaur, couldn't it just as easily mean that we came into being earlier than science accepts currently?

Here's another one: we were always here.

How about the Ancient Aliens theory? Our ancestors came here from another planet and got stranded here?

Or POOF creationism.

Maybe we're all holograms, as the quantum physicists now theorize and time is an illusion.

I think we don't know EVERYTHING, although scientists verbalize like their theories are the truth instead of what they actually are: a good guess, based on what they think they know.

The end. :-)

Wow, that is so much wrong there is unreal

Firstly, humans are extremely suggestible as a species and believe a lot of highly unlikely stuff and some downright factually incorrect stuff.

Secondly, it is no "as science currently suggests" it is as evidence suggests. But the fact is that there is no evidence to contradict that and lets face it, 64million years is a very, very, very, very long time.

Why are is there no evidence of us being here beyond around 200000 years ago?

Alien astronaut is not a theory, it is speculation and it certainly doesn't fit any evidence.

Creationism too contradicts evidence.

Quantum physics doesn't theorise a thing, that is a pseudo-scientific misuse of science.

Right, a theory is not a good guess, that is simply you not understanding science in the slightest. A theory is an empirically evidenced explanation to an observable fact. Secondly, if scientists knew everything they would have no job any more. You should probably read up on science before commenting on it .

[Mattshark]

those bible basher folks are getting desperate to back up their believes.

I don't understand why they think that showing dinosaurs and humans lived together would either 1) falsify evolution or 2) evidence creationism. It would do neither.

[Doctor_Strangelove]

Why is it people fail to follow the general rule that the most likely explanation is the most likely to be true. What we have is a bit of mud on a wall that resembles an animal thought to be long dead. Going by general consensus here, people find it more likely that a single smear of mud on the wall disproves common knowledge that man and dinosaur have never walked beside one another.

And that, my friends, is why we can't have nice things.

[Horus Christos]

those bible basher folks are getting desperate to back up their believes.

The only one's who are desperate are those that have to fake evidence to win an argument.

Why don't you try to think for yourself for once and look at the real drawing and form an opinion based on your own intelligence, and not just parrot what religious nuts tell you to believe?

While we know almost nothing about the true nature of reality (and it might not even be real, as someone noted before there are indications on the quantum level that the universe is pixelated - just like if we were holograms), one thing we do know for a FACT is that Humans and Dinosaurs did not co-exist.

DINO was not your great-great-grandpappy's dog. Hate to break it to you so bluntly but you have to be able to face reality at some point in time. Now why do I feel like I've just told a bunch of preschoolers that there is no Santa.........

[ChewiesArmy]

I think it's a water slide.

[Spezza]

There are lots of ancient depictions of dinosaurs the most famous is probably the Ica stones, look it up. By the way what do you think a dragon is supposed to be?

[ShadowSot]

There are lots of ancient depictions of dinosaurs the most famous is probably the Ica stones, look it up. By the way what do you think a dragon is supposed to be?

Inca Stones have been long proven to be a hoax, look it up.

[Doctor_Strangelove]

I think it's a water slide.

I second the notion that this drawing is evidence of ancient summer fun as opposed to creation theory.

[Horus Christos]

I second the notion that this drawing is evidence of ancient summer fun as opposed to creation theory.

Wait a minute...are you postulating waterslides in pre-history? Well that sounds like irrefutable evidences of ancient astronauts visiting the earth to me. After all, cavemen wouldn't have had the technology to build waterslides now would they?

[FurthurBB]

Wait a minute...are you postulating waterslides in pre-history? Well that sounds like irrefutable evidences of ancient astronauts visiting the earth to me. After all, cavemen wouldn't have had the technology to build waterslides now would they?

I saw water slides on the Flintstones. Proof that cavemen lived with dinosaurs and had water slides.

[danielost]

I saw water slides on the Flintstones. Proof that cavemen lived with dinosaurs and had water slides.

water slides are log flumes

[surfed]

I don't understand why they think that showing dinosaurs and humans lived together would either 1) falsify evolution or 2) evidence creationism. It would do neither.

It would help their claim that earth is 6000 years old or so

[Mattshark]

It would help their claim that earth is 6000 years old or so

Nope, it would have no effect on that at all.

water slides are log flumes

No, they are 2 different things.

[Doctor_Strangelove]

Wait a minute...are you postulating waterslides in pre-history? Well that sounds like irrefutable evidences of ancient astronauts visiting the earth to me. After all, cavemen wouldn't have had the technology to build waterslides now would they?

I'm not sure if you are serious or not...

Either way a wet surface at a downward slope isn't really alien technology.

[jesspy]

those bible basher folks are getting desperate to back up their believes.

Doubt it's shopped, but look at the other drawings around it. They have tinting on them, which leads me to believe that's caused by age. The dinosaur is in sharp contrast to those images, and appears to be made over them. It also looks like none of the marks continue through it.

It looks like someone used bleach or something similar to make the image.

That pic looked like a stencil and somone painted it.

But what i think we are all missing here people is the fact that maybe a dinosaur painted the picture... We can deny co existence with dinosaurs but we cant deny the possibility dionosaurs were intelligent and had art and culture and nice things.

[booNyzarC]

I think this is the pic:

I dunno... stylistically it seems much different than the pic of the man, and the preservation in comparison to the other images leaves me suspicious.

Pretty obvious what happened here. Clearly the dino made the cave painting in the first place and then some stupid human came along and drew himself next to it millions of years later, probably to impress a girl.

Don't believe it? What about those painting elephants in Thailand?

Oh alright, I'm kidding about the first part and was just looking for an excuse to post the video of those cool painting elephants.

I agree, this cave painting is highly suspicious.

[willowdreams]

heh, we have cheetoes that look like jesus, cloud formations that look like exotic and not so exotic creatures... and child like drawings that are innocent but like naughty

so i reckon you can have mud that looks like a dino.

the image to the right, if i take in the background part of the piccy lools like a mountain in background, image of some kind of hole/tunnel in mountain and to the left or end of the 'tail' or whatever looks like smoke or water

we each can make out many things.

I dunno, seems like if dinos and pple lived together, even in tar pits youd find skeletons of both.. together

[Ashtarel]

I can't see the dinosaur. To me, this creates a nice controversy about the supposition that North America didn't have horses until the ships from Europe came. The shapes all look like horsies. In the article itself, that picture looks like a cartoony ink drawing on clean white paper. It's useless and without meaning. Almost like a DELIBERATE silly claim, so people will be SURE and discount creationism as crazy and dumb and a great lie.

[Ashtarel]

heh, we have cheetoes that look like jesus, cloud formations that look like exotic and not so exotic creatures... and child like drawings that are innocent but like naughty

so i reckon you can have mud that looks like a dino.

the image to the right, if i take in the background part of the piccy lools like a mountain in background, image of some kind of hole/tunnel in mountain and to the left or end of the 'tail' or whatever looks like smoke or water

we each can make out many things.

I dunno, seems like if dinos and pple lived together, even in tar pits youd find skeletons of both.. together

Just want to compliment that little crawling bug of yours! I went after it to swat it off my screen! NEEEAT.

[booNyzarC]

I can't see the dinosaur. To me, this creates a nice controversy about the supposition that North America didn't have horses until the ships from Europe came. The shapes all look like horsies. In the article itself, that picture looks like a cartoony ink drawing on clean white paper. It's useless and without meaning. Almost like a DELIBERATE silly claim, so people will be SURE and discount creationism as crazy and dumb and a great lie.

There's a conspiracy around every corner...

(Edit to quote who I was responding to...)

Edited March 29, 2011 by booNyzarC

[danielost]

Nope, it would have no effect on that at all.

No, they are 2 different things.

no they are not. the first water slides were log flumes used as such by the loggers who were using the flumes to move logs to a river.

Edited March 29, 2011 by danielost

[Mattshark]

no they are not. the first water slides were log flumes used as such by the loggers who were using the flumes to move logs to a river.

But they are still log flumes, a specific thing, not a water slide, a recreational thing.. And that picture is clearly a water slide from the worlds first theme park.

Edited March 29, 2011 by Mattshark

[+DieChecker]

But what i think we are all missing here people is the fact that maybe a dinosaur painted the picture... We can deny co existence with dinosaurs but we cant deny the possibility dionosaurs were intelligent and had art and culture and nice things.

The Snake People!! Just like Lovecraft said!!

Cthulhu fhtagn!