Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Persia

U.S. May Consider Military Action in Syria

Recommended Posts

 
ohio state buckeyes

SOUTHERN SHUNEH, Jordan – U.S. Senator John McCain said Sunday that military action to protect civilians in Syria might be considered now that NATO's air campaign in Libya is ending.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/23/sen-mccain-says-us-may-consider-military-action-in-syria/#ixzz1bcdSLQOH

John is confused again someone should remind he is a senator not the President.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Farmer77

Whatever it takes to keep the military-industrial complex churning along huh Johnny?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Space Commander Travis

is he acting on anyone's authority to say this, or is this just his own preferred solution? (Which seems to be the automatic first response to any international situation of anyone with (R.) after their name.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark

Makes sense, there will be available troops drawn from Iraq and Libya soon :devil:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
conspiracybeliever

Ya we don't need any more on the unemployment line. As it is we're going to have to start building more jails and creating more criminals to hide the real numbers. :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
preacherman76

yea, great idea. :mellow:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lightly

next . . . . . post-86645-0-37480800-1319399242_thumb.g

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Corp

Given that McCain has zero role in creating American or NATO foreign policy this is just him voicing an opinion on something that I don't see happening. If NATO was to get involved in Syria it would be by Turkey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
preacherman76

is he acting on anyone's authority to say this, or is this just his own preferred solution? (Which seems to be the automatic first response to any international situation of anyone with (R.) after their name.)

This is really confusing. Are you seriously blaming all warmongering souly on republicans?? Where have you been the last 2 years?? Key is to look past what democrats say, and take a closer look at what they do. Since 0bama started he not only continued wars with Iraq and Afgan, but has bombed places in Yeman, Pakistan, and led the charge in lybia. Not only this, but has sent out endless propaganda regarding Iran and Syria. Foriegn police never changes from one administration to the next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Space Commander Travis

This is really confusing. Are you seriously blaming all warmongering souly on republicans?? Where have you been the last 2 years?? Key is to look past what democrats say, and take a closer look at what they do. Since 0bama started he not only continued wars with Iraq and Afgan, but has bombed places in Yeman, Pakistan, and led the charge in lybia. Not only this, but has sent out endless propaganda regarding Iran and Syria. Foriegn police never changes from one administration to the next.

Suppose that he had decided the moment he came into office, to pull the plug on Iraq and Afghan; now wouldn't he have been nailed up to a tree by all and sundry for leaving them in the :unsure2: and cutting and running? I rarely feel sorry for politicians of any shade, but Presidents and Prime Ministers really can never do right by everyone. Same with Libya; people say that he doesn't get enough credit, and other people say that he "led the charge". And if he hadn't done anything, i bet you anything you like the same people would be attacking him for abandoning the people of Libya and letting genocide happen. They really are damned if they do, damned if they don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Space Commander Travis

This is really confusing. Are you seriously blaming all warmongering souly on republicans?? Where have you been the last 2 years?? Key is to look past what democrats say, and take a closer look at what they do. Since 0bama started he not only continued wars with Iraq and Afgan, but has bombed places in Yeman, Pakistan, and led the charge in lybia. Not only this, but has sent out endless propaganda regarding Iran and Syria. Foriegn police never changes from one administration to the next.

Suppose that he had decided the moment he came into office, to pull the plug on Iraq and Afghan; now wouldn't he have been nailed up to a tree by all and sundry for leaving them in the :unsure2: and cutting and running? I rarely feel sorry for politicians of any shade, but Presidents and Prime Ministers really can never do right by everyone. Same with Libya; people say that he doesn't get enough credit, and other people say that he "led the charge". And if he hadn't done anything, i bet you anything you like the same people would be attacking him for abandoning the people of Libya and letting genocide happen. They really are damned if they do, damned if they don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Corp

Very true. They want "something to be done" and then condemn any action that's taken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.