Agishe Posted January 21, 2018 #76 Share Posted January 21, 2018 Don't be so fast. Where to find Patty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted January 21, 2018 #77 Share Posted January 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Agishe said: Don't be so fast. Where to find Patty Oh crap, now I'm going to have this garbage all over my Youtube page....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DieChecker Posted January 21, 2018 #78 Share Posted January 21, 2018 (edited) I think the video quality was bad enough. There was no need to do any edits. If it was a suit, and I think it probably was, then the poor quality alone would have done the best job of covering it up. I mean look at the stills in previous posts (Post 74). Can you tell anything at all in those? People who see muscles moving... really, at this quality of video? Edited January 21, 2018 by DieChecker 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrLzs Posted January 21, 2018 #79 Share Posted January 21, 2018 When transcribing a video to digital, and then resaving it for youtube, etc... there are innumerable issues that can cause distortions, artefacts, even frame/partial frame sequencing errors. If anyone here has done a proper, real analysis - one that shows the methodology used, any assumptions, etc - then please post some details. I ain't bothering to look at a video based on a one line claim about 'proof'. A proper analysis would normally require access to the original footage. If not, it would need to have full details of all the processing steps and settings for each transcription or resave... Without that, any guesses about why the frame content jumps around are just that - guesses. I'm not for a moment defending the god-awful footage (which for a number of other reasons I believe is completely fake..), but you don't get to debunk stuff by using handwaved claims of 'analysis'. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agishe Posted January 21, 2018 #80 Share Posted January 21, 2018 (edited) However, even with this video quality, the stop, and especially the unnatural first step after it, can only be interpreted as part of the pre-agreed shooting process, and not as an accidentally caught moment. P.S. Thanks to Leroy Blevins Sr, thru whose attentiveness I find out about these inconspicuous shots. Edited January 21, 2018 by Agishe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DieChecker Posted January 24, 2018 #81 Share Posted January 24, 2018 (edited) Am I remembering right that the PG Film (The actual original film reel) is still missing? Only copies from copies remain. Most videos on the internet are probably a copy five or six times over. Edited January 24, 2018 by DieChecker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldrover Posted January 24, 2018 #82 Share Posted January 24, 2018 49 minutes ago, DieChecker said: Am I remembering right that the PG Film (The actual original film reel) is still missing? Only copies from copies remain. Most videos on the internet are probably a copy five or six times over. Something like that yes. Although the entire reel is now available. Which adds very much to its authenticity. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now