Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Look Mama, no diamond saw


questionmark

Recommended Posts

hello kmt_sesh , i know Brien Forrester personally ,as i have traveled around Peru and Bolivia with him and no i do not agree with all his theories .

i would like to share some images that i took from the sites in South America ,are we limited to a certain number of images per post on this site ?

questionmark thankyou for this thread , it is the reason i joined UM .

It's all right as long as there your own photos. It might be enjoyable to view them. Just don't go overboard—be very selective about what you want to show us. Bandwidth, you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hello kmt_sesh , i know Brien Forrester personally ,as i have traveled around Peru and Bolivia with him and no i do not agree with all his theories .

i would like to share some images that i took from the sites in South America ,are we limited to a certain number of images per post on this site ?

questionmark thankyou for this thread , it is the reason i joined UM .

Sounds like a good idea. And Welcome to UM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

and here we have an example of how to forge bloom iron with stones:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and here we have an example of how to forge bloom iron with stones:

[media=]

[/media]

I see people using steel hammerheads and steel pliers.

Must be my old eyes,lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see people using steel hammerheads and steel pliers.

Must be my old eyes,lol.

Then you missed the beginning,they were using rocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here is a couple of vids from Brien ,those core drill holes in rose granite are extraordinary.

[media=]

and no mumbo-jumbo needed, the explanation is here (not).

Really ancient technology that works quite well. If I am not mistaken we have a few videos demonstrating stone saws, cord saws and tube drills on this thread.

Edited by questionmark
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and no mumbo-jumbo needed, the explanation is here (not).

Really ancient technology that works quite well. If I am not mistaken we have a few videos demonstrating stone saws, cord saws and tube drills on this thread.

Funny thing is that the guy who is explaining the "Ancient Machining" techniques is none other Chris Dunn of the idiotic Giza Power Plant infamy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny thing is that the guy who is explaining the "Ancient Machining" techniques is none other Chris Dunn of the idiotic Giza Power Plant infamy.

Well, I guess he thinks that they did not use a bow drill but a power drill.... :innocent:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really ancient technology that works quite well. If I am not mistaken we have a few videos demonstrating stone saws, cord saws and tube drills on this thread.

Do the video's of your hand worked cores etc show the same comparable tooling marks/ striations etc ?

Edited by Banksy Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do the video's of your hand worked cores etc show the same comparable tooling marks/ striations etc ?

mostly yes. There is little difference on the work object if the marks were done by quartzite (also known as sand) or diamond dust. The only difference is the effectiveness of the two media, you will need much more quartzite than diamond to drill, cut, file, the same area on the same stone or metal. Yet it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really ?

So the feed rate shown by striations within a bore of a hand worked piece and a machined piece are the same then ?

Have you got any clips to back that up that we can compare with ?

Is Chris Dunn etc making up those claims then that they are different ?

Edited by Banksy Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really ?

So the feed rate shown by striations within a bore of a hand worked piece and a machined piece are the same then ?

Have you got any clips to back that up that we can compare with ?

Is Chris Dunn etc making up those claims then that they are different ?

Chris Dunn is famous for making up things... like the Giza power plant.

And from the marks you cannot tell the boring speed (to the contrary of his claims) but only the coarseness of the grain used.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really ?

So the feed rate shown by striations within a bore of a hand worked piece and a machined piece are the same then ?

Have you got any clips to back that up that we can compare with ?

Is Chris Dunn etc making up those claims then that they are different ?

No, not really.

The entire "they did it with string and bow saws" theory is both unevidenced and logically unsound. There IS a reason why its proponents spend all their time arguing about it rather than proving it with completed, verifiable replicas of originals. They can't, so they drone on about how obviously simple it was to do. What's funny is how these claimed adherents of "science" have sudden amnesia about how true scientific conclusions are achieved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not really.

The entire "they did it with string and bow saws" theory is both unevidenced and logically unsound.

Straw man. Nobody makes this claim but it is convenient for you to claim they do because you can't dispute what they actually say.

Bow saws are used to saw wood. To drill stone one must use a tube saw. No strings attached.

Harte

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not really.

The entire "they did it with string and bow saws" theory is both unevidenced and logically unsound. There IS a reason why its proponents spend all their time arguing about it rather than proving it with completed, verifiable replicas of originals. They can't, so they drone on about how obviously simple it was to do. What's funny is how these claimed adherents of "science" have sudden amnesia about how true scientific conclusions are achieved.

ehm...right:

http://snagplayer.video.dp.discovery.com/478854/snag-it-player.htm?auto=no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Straw man. Nobody makes this claim but it is convenient for you to claim they do because you can't dispute what they actually say.

Bow saws are used to saw wood. To drill stone one must use a tube saw. No strings attached.

Harte

Double straw man. It has been claimed here that straight cuts in granite found in Egypt and Peru were made using string and silica. Further, it has been claimed here (and "proven" with cartoon sketches) that holes were drilled in granite using chert-flake drill bits and/or tube saws powered by string-bows.

Which returns us inevitably to the bottom line...nobody has credibly demonstrated ANY of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. The video begins with a scene showing red granite and cuts to a demonstration of drilling limestone/sandstone.

Sleight of hand? Or just an honest mistake...

Either way, it's not science.

Because there is no worse blind than he who does not want to see...

We know, we know.

And no, That scene is in the National Museum of Cairo where they always use sandstone, that way the visitors can see a whole hole drilled in a few minutes instead of just a little ring. It works the same in any stone, just much slower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because there is no worse blind than he who does not want to see...

We know, we know.

I can't argue with any of this! Of course, this chert-flake of wisdom has a double-edge...

Edited by lilthor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no, That scene is in the National Museum of Cairo where they always use sandstone, that way the visitors can see a whole hole drilled in a few minutes instead of just a little ring. It works the same in any stone, just much slower.

Right. So slow, in fact, that there exist no known replicas (in granite) completed in the last 2,500 years? So slow, that the visitors might themselves be mummified by the time the demonstration was finished?

Face it...that video is highly misleading and hardly useful in proving anything substantive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. So slow, in fact, that there exist no known replicas (in granite) completed in the last 2,500 years? So slow, that the visitors might themselves be mummified by the time the demonstration was finished?

Face it...that video is highly misleading and hardly useful in proving anything substantive.

Yes, sure, making holes in hard stone is so impossible that even the native Americans were capable of doing it. Without metal:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double straw man. It has been claimed here that straight cuts in granite found in Egypt and Peru were made using string and silica. Further, it has been claimed here (and "proven" with cartoon sketches) that holes were drilled in granite using chert-flake drill bits and/or tube saws powered by string-bows.

Which returns us inevitably to the bottom line...nobody has credibly demonstrated ANY of it.

IIRC (and this thread is fairly old,) it was suggested that string could have been used to saw stone. IMO, a silly suggestion in light of the evidence we actually have.

What has been demonstrated, on the other hand, is that bronze or copper saws can be used, along with sand, to saw through stone (slabbing saws.)

Egyptian reliefs show this being done, BTW.

Coring drills used by Egyptians (again, shown in actual reliefs from the AE's) can be powered with bows or by hand, depending on how much weight (again, shown in artwork) is placed on the top.

Harte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. The video begins with a scene showing red granite and cuts to a demonstration of drilling limestone/sandstone.

Sleight of hand? Or just an honest mistake...

Either way, it's not science.

I believe Chris Dunn did a proper demo using a copper tube drill and a piece of granite and using the sand etc that is said to have been used. Unfortunately the marks left behind where totally different, i forget the name of the program though that it was shown in.

Shame those that like to take snide pops at Mr Dunn don't have the gumption to try it themselves. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.