Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

The RB-47 UFO Incident


Recommended Posts

Assuming your point is valid PFP, that is only part of the phenomenon. There were visuals too. How do you

'debunk' those?

Those "visuals" disappeared entirely. That indicates natural phenomena.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But ? But ? what about the Facts ? THe people that saw them-thar Aliens flying those disc,saucers,ect Cigars all thru the 50`s and 60`s and On ,And On ! Do they not account for at least a "Waz-up ?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those "visuals" disappeared entirely. That indicates natural phenomena.

Unless you invoke the ever popular 'do-anything exotic alien technology'. Nothing like using an unverified, unsupported ambiguous hypothesis to explain an unknown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those "visuals" disappeared entirely. That indicates natural phenomena.

In fact, the "light" seemed to blink on and off several times over two hours, as it followed them and they followed it.

"As the RB47E approached Jackson, Mississippi for the 2nd part of its planned exercise to perform ECM runs against known ground radar units (about 150 miles from Gulfport), the command pilot spotted what he first thinks are landing lights of another jet coming in very fast. The pilot tells the crew; "Looks as though we may have to take evasive maneuvers." Before he can do anything else, the light is upon them, changes direction and flashes directly across their flight path. Both pilots see this occur. Then, taking them totally by surprise, the light simply blinks out.

In an interview with James McDonald, the pilot stated it didn't take off. It just disappeared in front of them. Just before it blinked off, the object had jumped from an 11 o'clock position to a 2 o'clock position in the blink of an eye, as witnessed by both pilots. Neither the movement or the blinking out is technologically possible for our planes, even today. (I believe scientists may have recently moved sub-atomic particles similar to this but not whole planes, and remember, this is back in 1957, more than fifty years ago.)

Pilot and co-pilot immediately begin talking about what had just happened. One of the ELINT operators remembered he got a signal at 2,995-3000 mhz, and set his #2 monitor to scan at 3,000 mhz. On his first scan, the operator got a strong 3,000 mhz signal from their two o'clock position; the bearing on which the luminous object had blinked out moments earlier. The operator of monitor #1 then tuned his equipment to the same frequency and got the same return. He saw it too."

I admit that I don't have a clue how the UFO was doing all this, or why. I can only guess about that, but it did act like it was playing tag--or perhaps demonstrating its superiority.

Whatever the signal really was, it was definitely coming from the air, not the ground, and from the same locations where they saw the UFO.

Edited by TheMcGuffin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But ? But ? what about the Facts ? THe people that saw them-thar Aliens flying those disc,saucers,ect Cigars all thru the 50`s and 60`s and On ,And On ! Do they not account for at least a "Waz-up ?"

It definitely gets a wazzup, but not a conclusion :D

wazzup.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, the "light" seemed to blink on and off several times over two hours, as it followed them and they followed it.

Indeed, as I said, it disappeared regularly, which indicates natural phenomena, so does "cat n mouse" when we consider electrical charges.

It is just too old and convoluted. James McDonald had his "final say" in the 60's, Klass did not bother with it until the 70's so little challenge was there. I just figure to had little to work with more than what is essentially a ghost story. Even if this was a genuine Alien space craft playing games with a plane, I do not feel enough information exists to determine such. It's just an anomaly in antiquity. And it only remains an anomaly because so little is known other than some pilots saw an intermittent light. Quite a few bombers reported anomalies didn't they? Maybe it was an equipment characteristic. Phil Klass did show that the plane had a faulty relay connected to the polarity switch as PFP stated. Nicap confirm this in their evaluation - here.

In addition to the previous, we also have a faulty system on the plane, and a meteor shower in this vicinity. I feel the more compelling cases are ones where one does not have to create a case to fit the events. Particularly so when prosaic explanations can also fit the bill.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you invoke the ever popular 'do-anything exotic alien technology'. Nothing like using an unverified, unsupported ambiguous hypothesis to explain an unknown.

It just goes downhill from there IMHO. A sensible debate is valuable, but white washing nonsense is just feeding imaginations. I do not understand how some can be satisfied with such, and then go on to say how anyone who listens to a scientist is a sheep. These are people obviously not well versed in logic, which is just another evil and have no concept of empirical evidence.

Ahh well, they do say it takes all types, and by gum so it does indeed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, as I said, it disappeared regularly, which indicates natural phenomena, so does "cat n mouse" when we consider electrical charges.

It is just too old and convoluted. James McDonald had his "final say" in the 60's, Klass did not bother with it until the 70's so little challenge was there. I just figure to had little to work with more than what is essentially a ghost story. Even if this was a genuine Alien space craft playing games with a plane, I do not feel enough information exists to determine such. It's just an anomaly in antiquity. And it only remains an anomaly because so little is known other than some pilots saw an intermittent light. Quite a few bombers reported anomalies didn't they? Maybe it was an equipment characteristic. Phil Klass did show that the plane had a faulty relay connected to the polarity switch as PFP stated. Nicap confirm this in their evaluation - here.

In addition to the previous, we also have a faulty system on the plane, and a meteor shower in this vicinity. I feel the more compelling cases are ones where one does not have to create a case to fit the events. Particularly so when prosaic explanations can also fit the bill.

I put this one in the unknown category since no one at Blue Book, ATIC, Air Defense Command or anywhere else was able to identify it as a known aircraft. They certainly trued to identify it as something because the indications are that the investigation went on for months behind the scenes, but with no results except unknown and unexplained.

I think we can safely rule out a meteorire or any other natural phenomenon behaving this way for two hours, and the UFO was detected from at least two radar stations on the ground, as well as visually and by radar in the air.

As far as the thing attempting to mimic our radar signals, I have no explanation for that either, but since it did not respond to IFF (Idenification Friend or Foe) we know that it wasn't one of us, while trying to imagine that it was something from the Soviets flying that far south in 1957 seems highly unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put this one in the unknown category since no one at Blue Book, ATIC, Air Defense Command or anywhere else was able to identify it as a known aircraft. They certainly trued to identify it as something because the indications are that the investigation went on for months behind the scenes, but with no results except unknown and unexplained.

I think we can safely rule out a meteorire or any other natural phenomenon behaving this way for two hours, and the UFO was detected from at least two radar stations on the ground, as well as visually and by radar in the air.

As far as the thing attempting to mimic our radar signals, I have no explanation for that either, but since it did not respond to IFF (Idenification Friend or Foe) we know that it wasn't one of us, while trying to imagine that it was something from the Soviets flying that far south in 1957 seems highly unlikely.

I cannot disagree with this evaluation, it is a mystery, and will likely remain unexplained. It is just too long since anyone can access the information directly. The meteor I find might still be a factor as a shower was happening making the sighting of such probably quite regular during the discussed time frame but would not account for the instances of cat n mouse. I am for the moment putting the strangeness of the signal down to the experimental types being tested at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot disagree with this evaluation, it is a mystery, and will likely remain unexplained. It is just too long since anyone can access the information directly. The meteor I find might still be a factor as a shower was happening making the sighting of such probably quite regular during the discussed time frame but would not account for the instances of cat n mouse. I am for the moment putting the strangeness of the signal down to the experimental types being tested at the time.

An intelligent meteor that follows aircraft? :cry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An intelligent meteor that follows aircraft? :cry:

I think that's one of the things that had them so perplexed back then, since meteorites or other natural phenomena don't act this way. They don't emit signals and don't follow planes around for two hours, but they couldn't identify it as any known aircraft. They certainly gave it the old college try, though, but in the end they just admitted that they didn't know what it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An intelligent meteor that follows aircraft? :cry:

It was a meteor shower. That means a meteor possibly every few seconds down to minutes at time during the shower. Some meteors do fall in a horizontal fashion - consider approaching earth on an oblique angle at high speed, gravity is not strong enough to sway the path significantly being a weak force in nature. The inertia will overcome, so you could be seeing things in all directions, which conceivably could be perceived as "following."

It pays to consider that they are hitting the atmosphere at high speed as well, can the temps induce induction plasmas? I do not know, but I bet that question is worth asking. I said it did not explain the "cat n mouse" in my post if you re-read it, but I would put that down to plasmas, which I would like to pursue the possibility of connecting plasmas with meteors. In any case, the faulty relay could account for the "cat n mouse" readings.

Edited by psyche101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's one of the things that had them so perplexed back then, since meteorites or other natural phenomena don't act this way. They don't emit signals and don't follow planes around for two hours, but they couldn't identify it as any known aircraft. They certainly gave it the old college try, though, but in the end they just admitted that they didn't know what it was.

I do not think the meteorites are a complete conclusion, but surely a meteor shower happening at the time must add to some confusion? We know the craft had faulty on board electronics to - that pesky relay. I know you prefer the ET option, and going out on my speculation limb, which as you know I rarely do, if ET was coming here, and had nefarious purposes so therefore wanted to remain covert, a meteor shower might just provide the right "cover"?

Also, the plane was not followed for two hours was it? As far as I recall the sighting was intermittent, as such, Tim Printy broke the sighting into 4 different phases to help with the process of elimination. If there was a 2 hour pursuit, fighters would have gone up wouldn't they? That would be a definite perceived threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...which I would like to pursue the possibility of connecting plasmas with meteors.

OK, you have my interest piqued. An intriguing notion and one that I haven't heard before. Have you found any correlation or is this a fairly new pursuit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, you have my interest piqued. An intriguing notion and one that I haven't heard before. Have you found any correlation or is this a fairly new pursuit?

Very new idea, probably more my mind rambling, but I think that the temperature ranges of meteor re-entry should be sufficient to induce plasma. I was thinking if heating gasses can reduce the number of electrons (or increase them) to make a plasma, and meteors come from all places with many compositions, why would a meteor at sufficient speed, with sufficient size to manage re-entry not be able to burn of elements into a gas, which could then in turn be heated further to create an atmospheric plasma? Could the meteor itself turn into a gas at high temps - mini comets if you will? (I am asking myself this in case I am getting confusing) In the Universe, plasma is the most common state for ordinary matter so we see many natural occurrences although on a far grander scale than I am looking at I admit, but it seems to me reasonable that a scaled down version seems rather possible when one can create a pasma in an ordinary lightbulb. Alternatively, could a superheated meteor gather a small amount of plasma, and "build up" in earths natural reserves with it's magnetic properties? I might be way off track, but it seems a reasonable pursuit to consider? It would be a regular source that creates such anomalies, and perhaps might explain a portion of claims. I have a few paths to wander yet in any case :D

Earth's Natural Plasma Fountain courtesy wikipedia

Plasma_fountain.gif

Artist's rendition of the Earth's

, showing oxygen, helium, and hydrogen ions that gush into space from regions near the Earth's poles. The faint yellow area shown above the north pole represents gas lost from Earth into space; the green area is the

, where plasma energy pours back into the atmosphere.

Edited by psyche101
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very new idea, probably more my mind rambling, but I think that the temperature ranges of meteor re-entry should be sufficient to induce plasma. I was thinking if heating gasses can reduce the number of electrons (or increase them) to make a plasma, and meteors come from all places with many compositions, why would a meteor at sufficient speed, with sufficient size to manage re-entry not be able to burn of elements into a gas, which could then in turn be heated further to create an atmospheric plasma? Could the meteor itself turn into a gas at high temps - mini comets if you will? (I am asking myself this in case I am getting confusing) In the Universe, plasma is the most common state for ordinary matter so we see many natural occurrences although on a far grander scale than I am looking at I admit, but it seems to me reasonable that a scaled down version seems rather possible when one can create a pasma in an ordinary lightbulb. Alternatively, could a superheated meteor gather a small amount of plasma, and "build up" in earths natural reserves with it's magnetic properties? I might be way off track, but it seems a reasonable pursuit to consider? It would be a regular source that creates such anomalies, and perhaps might explain a portion of claims. I have a few paths to wander yet in any case :D

Earth's Natural Plasma Fountain courtesy wikipedia

Plasma_fountain.gif

Artist's rendition of the Earth's

, showing oxygen, helium, and hydrogen ions that gush into space from regions near the Earth's poles. The faint yellow area shown above the north pole represents gas lost from Earth into space; the green area is the

, where plasma energy pours back into the atmosphere.

I readily admit that my knowledge of plasmas is limited but I don't see any reason why your hypothesis isn't at least plausible. I'd have to look into methods of plasma formation a little deeper to comment further though. This is the kind of stuff I like to see on these boards though, I like the way your brain works. I think you may have inadvertently caused me to have to do some reading though. :D:tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody brilliant! The thought never occurred to me but I must say that I can see your line of thinking and agree that it is entirely possible. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think the meteorites are a complete conclusion, but surely a meteor shower happening at the time must add to some confusion? We know the craft had faulty on board electronics to - that pesky relay. I know you prefer the ET option, and going out on my speculation limb, which as you know I rarely do, if ET was coming here, and had nefarious purposes so therefore wanted to remain covert, a meteor shower might just provide the right "cover"?

Also, the plane was not followed for two hours was it? As far as I recall the sighting was intermittent, as such, Tim Printy broke the sighting into 4 different phases to help with the process of elimination. If there was a 2 hour pursuit, fighters would have gone up wouldn't they? That would be a definite perceived threat.

Even the 1947 UFO wave took place during a meteor shower, and there has long been an association between these and increased UFO reports, especially the short duration, lights in the night sky type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody brilliant! The thought never occurred to me but I must say that I can see your line of thinking and agree that it is entirely possible. :tu:

After a cursory search I have found that meteors can attain temperatures of over 1600 C, though I am not sure if that is the upper limit because of physics or if that's just the highest we've recorded. Also, I'm not sure yet what kind of temps we are looking at for plasma formation. One thing of note though is the ionization trail that a meteor generates which would be essential for plasma formation. Interesting stuff. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After a cursory search I have found that meteors can attain temperatures of over 1600 C, though I am not sure if that is the upper limit because of physics or if that's just the highest we've recorded. Also, I'm not sure yet what kind of temps we are looking at for plasma formation. One thing of note though is the ionization trail that a meteor generates which would be essential for plasma formation. Interesting stuff. :tu:

Extremely interesting stuff indeed and I find the idea to be feasible in the very least. I hope that Badeskov and Lost_Shaman pop in to offer their thoughts on the idea. They've both done some extensive study into plasma and I'd bet they would add some thought provoking insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot disagree with this evaluation, it is a mystery, and will likely remain unexplained. It is just too long since anyone can access the information directly. The meteor I find might still be a factor as a shower was happening making the sighting of such probably quite regular during the discussed time frame but would not account for the instances of cat n mouse. I am for the moment putting the strangeness of the signal down to the experimental types being tested at the time.

Phil Klass did get several things wrong in his analysis of this case, such as the civilian airliners that were actually nowhere near the RB-47 at this time, and the fact that they checked the onboard equipment immediately after the plane landed and found none of the damage that he suggested.

The type of radar that he thought would account for the signal was not even operating at that time, even on the ground, and the UFO signal was different in any case. Whatever was giving off that signal was following them in the air for two hours, and was relatively close to the RB-47, even circling around it at one point.

When the light blined out, it disappeared from radar, then reappeared when it turned back on.

I don't think that a meteor would be able to move below the aircraft at one point, while at other times being above it, or at the same altitude, and once even coming at the plane head on. This would be an extremely peculiar meteor, and one that lasted for an impossibly long duration. I don't know how it could hover in place and then move up and down.

Edited by TheMcGuffin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody brilliant! The thought never occurred to me but I must say that I can see your line of thinking and agree that it is entirely possible. :tu:

I readily admit that my knowledge of plasmas is limited but I don't see any reason why your hypothesis isn't at least plausible. I'd have to look into methods of plasma formation a little deeper to comment further though. This is the kind of stuff I like to see on these boards though, I like the way your brain works. I think you may have inadvertently caused me to have to do some reading though. :D:tu:

Thanks guys! It is still a work in progress, and I am with you Boon I would appreciate any help I can get.

With regards to temperatures, I think that the point is dependant on atmospheric pressure, the lower the pressure, the easier to get the plasma going. I am not 100% certain, but I think the lower threshold is a mere few hundred degrees dependant on conditions. A portion of the ionosphere is essentially a plasma. (from 50 miles up to about 600 miles)

There are also "dusty" plasmas which contain particles within them. This could have a unique visual effect.

Then again, a Plasma ball is basically a capacitor driven by an RF power source. Still looking at that possible, after all, RF is pretty common with AF vehicles :D

Have a look at this, maybe you can see something I have missed :DLink - The Evolution of Power Delivery in Plasma Processing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil Klass did get several things wrong in his analysis of this case, such as the civilian airliners that were actually nowhere near the RB-47 at this time, and the fact that they checked the onboard equipment immediately after the plane landed and found none of the damage that he suggested.

The type of radar that he thought would account for the signal was not even operating at that time, even on the ground, and the UFO signal was different in any case. Whatever was giving off that signal was following them in the air for two hours, and was relatively close to the RB-47, even circling around it at one point.

When the light blined out, it disappeared from radar, then reappeared when it turned back on.

Yes, the relay was not found to be faulty, however, he was third in line with that hypothesis, McClure himself also suggested that was a likely cause. An intermittent fault seems possible, but as you say does not account for the visual claims. I would be suggesting a series of events rather than any single one to attempt to explain the anomalies.

I don't think that a meteor would be able to move below the aircraft at one point, while at other times being above it, or at the same altitude, and once even coming at the plane head on. This would be an extremely peculiar meteor, and one that lasted for an impossibly long duration. I don't know how it could hover in place and then move up and down.

Indeed, but a meteor can look stationary when head on, and they can move in a horizontal path. My sighting sounds quite a bit like this one with regards to speed and colour, excepting duration. I agree, no one meteor could achieve such an illusion, but I feel it is conceivable a great many might cause part of the confusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were a Great aircraft ! My money is on what the pilots saw !

post-68971-0-87211800-1339562867_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may well be worth a read

http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/153110704773600258

ABSTRACT from above link.

The speed and mass dependence of meteor air plasma temperatures is perhaps the most important data needed to understand how small meteoroids chemically change the ambient atmosphere in their path and enrich the ablated meteoric organic matter with oxygen. Such chemistry can play an important role in creating prebiotic compounds. The excitation conditions in various air plasma emissions were measured from high-resolution optical spectra of Leonid storm meteors during NASA's Leonid Multi-Instrument Aircraft Campaign. This was the first time a sufficient number and range of temperature measurements were obtained to search for meteoroid mass and speed dependencies. We found slight increases in temperature with decreasing altitude, but otherwise nearly constant values for meteoroids with speeds between 35 and 72 km/s and masses between 10-5 g and 1 g. We conclude that faster and more massive meteoroids produce a larger emission volume, but not a higher air plasma temperature. We speculate that the meteoric plasma may be in multiphase equilibrium with the ambient atmosphere, which could mean lower plasma temperatures in a CO2-rich early Earth atmosphere.

The last two sentences are quite interesting, although I have yet to look into the PDF contained in link.

They were a Great aircraft ! My money is on what the pilots saw !

My money is with you D....what odds did we get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.