ali smack Posted October 14, 2012 #1 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Why does Richard Dawkins dislike religion so much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendy Demon Posted October 14, 2012 #2 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Mostly because people use religion as a shield to hide their ignorance behind. Religion had its superficial uses when people were largely ignorant and felt that monsters, demons and gods caused all of the worlds problems but now that we have various tools at our disposal and we understand our world without resorting to fantasy to explain that which we don't understand. But therein lies the problem, thinking can be hard work so it is easier for many to just say "god did it" and then go about their day watching Wheel of Fortune and football. Quite frankly many people like to feel that there is some sky monster in control of everything that is ready to kill you for the mere act of thinking for yourself and asking questions that challenge the religious status quo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varelse Posted October 14, 2012 #3 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Religion is mind control. Mind control is evil. Its used by the highest powers that be to get their way. They are so intoxicated with power, power 1000 X's more addicting than the most pure heroin, that they believe they are the only real gods. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 14, 2012 #4 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Dawkins sees more bad in religion then good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golly Buster Posted October 14, 2012 #5 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Why does Richard Dawkins dislike religion so much? He's figured out that it sells books. It's sorta become his 'thing' now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted October 14, 2012 #6 Share Posted October 14, 2012 (edited) He's figured out that it sells books. It's sorta become his 'thing' now. This is at least partly the reason he bangs on about it. There is a substantial sector of the population that resents being pushed into religious settings, they are typically young, and not unreasonably, are more interested in life before death, than life after death ! People will come to religion when they are good and ready, like an animal will drink when it is thirsty, not because someone tells them to "hydrate" because it is good for them. These people are attracted to anti-religionist propaganda, but only if they still feel "pressure" from others to participate in organized religion. Otherwise they couldn't care less what some "authority" like Dawkins has to say about religious belief. Edited October 14, 2012 by Habitat 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 14, 2012 #7 Share Posted October 14, 2012 (edited) Please, religion is by no means something someone comes to when they're 'good and ready', they come to it when they feel like they're missing something. Not a bad thing, but it's not something everyone needs or even wants. Edited October 14, 2012 by Hasina 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted October 14, 2012 #8 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Please, religion is by no means something someone comes to when they're 'good and ready', they come to it when they feel like they're missing something. Not a bad thing, but it's not something everyone needs or even wants. Feeling the need for, or the lack of religion is being "good and ready" for it in my lexicon, if not yours. (From "The Free Dictionary" when one is good and ready "when one is completely ready. I'll be there when I'm good and ready. Ann will finish the job when she's good and ready and not a minute sooner." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 14, 2012 #9 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Semantic argument is semantic argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted October 14, 2012 #10 Share Posted October 14, 2012 Hasina says: "they (Wildebeest) only come to it ( the waterhole) when they feel like they're missing something( a nice long drink of water) ! " I say: " Wildebeest will come to the waterhole when they are good and ready, and like any animal, will only drink when it is thirsty" Seems to me you are just agreeing with me ! If you want a silly argument, I am not playing ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 14, 2012 #11 Share Posted October 14, 2012 You're comparing a bodily need to a 'need' that is only existent in some people. Everyone dies if they don't drink water, everyone lives if they have religion or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted October 15, 2012 #12 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Religion is inextricably bound up with the need for meaning in life. Everyone needs a "why", there are no exceptions to that rule, just the same as we all need water, it becomes a matter of how with more experience in life people find it more difficult to see meaning in trivialities and ephemeralities, and reach for the eternal. This is a natural progression that is not inevitable, some people fuss over petty concerns all their lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 15, 2012 #13 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Once again, you die if you don't drink water, you don't die if you don't have a meaning to life. I personally don't need a 'why' in life, I'm alive and that's good enough for me, I find enjoyment in everything. And your own comparison of needing water and needing religion falls flat in your own post when you said 'This is a natural progression that is not inevitable', you have to drink water, you by no means need a meaning in life, or a purpose, or anything in life but to live. Enjoyment, pain, etc are all concepts humans have, the majority of animals just live, pass on their genes, then die. Humans are animals, we just have complex emotions because of our social tendencies and our intelligence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Buzzkill Posted October 15, 2012 #14 Share Posted October 15, 2012 (edited) I find the Dawkin's book that i am currently reading (the god delusion) very interesting, being a firm Deist myself. However, most of his (very sound) arguments are directed towards a "religious" god, not a Deist god. The main argument against using god as an answer to any question is that the answer is more complicated than the question, which i agree with entirely. However, when he gets to the key points where god may be hiding (i.e, the origin of life and the start of the universe) he has no answers. In this case i believe that a deist god is a much more satisfactory answer then the non-answers he provides (i.e that complex proteins "evolved" without being alive, or an infinitely regressing universe). I recommend the book to anyone who is religious as a "test of faith" as it comprehensively shows a religious/personal god to be a superstition. Edited October 15, 2012 by Professor Buzzkill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted October 15, 2012 #15 Share Posted October 15, 2012 you don't die if you don't have a meaning to life. I personally don't need a 'why' in life, So you may think, erroneously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odin11 Posted October 15, 2012 #16 Share Posted October 15, 2012 So you may think, erroneously. You're quite full of yourself, aren't you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Buzzkill Posted October 15, 2012 #17 Share Posted October 15, 2012 So you may think, erroneously. My "why" in life is my family, whom i work hard for, love and protect and want to see them do the best in life. Would you ever test your faith by reading Dawkins, The God Delusion? If not, why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odin11 Posted October 15, 2012 #18 Share Posted October 15, 2012 He's figured out that it sells books. It's sorta become his 'thing' now. I find it somewhat funny and also a little sad that when people talk about Richard Dawkins they talk as if he only has one book, The God Delusion. The Selfish Gene The Extended Phenotype The Blind Watchmaker River Out of Eden Climbing Mount Improbable Unweaving the Rainbow A Devil's Chaplain The Ancestor's Tale The God Delusion The Greatest Show on Earth The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True Out of 11 books, only 1 is about religion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Buzzkill Posted October 15, 2012 #19 Share Posted October 15, 2012 (edited) I find it somewhat funny and also a little sad that when people talk about Richard Dawkins they talk as if he only has one book, The God Delusion. The Selfish Gene The Extended Phenotype The Blind Watchmaker River Out of Eden Climbing Mount Improbable Unweaving the Rainbow A Devil's Chaplain The Ancestor's Tale The God Delusion The Greatest Show on Earth The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True Out of 11 books, only 1 is about religion. The blind watchmaker and climbing mount improbable are both referenced in the god delusion to make points against creationist arguments. I bet there are other books which he will reference in the last 100 pages that i haven't read yet. Edit to add that some of those titles have biblical references in the titles as well Edited October 15, 2012 by Professor Buzzkill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 15, 2012 #20 Share Posted October 15, 2012 So you may think, erroneously. So you assume, and you know what they say about assume, don't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted October 15, 2012 #21 Share Posted October 15, 2012 It is a perfectly healthy situation to not give a damn about religiosity in youth, it is really a matter that should only be attended to at later stages of life. Needless to say, the arrogance of youth insists they will know exactly what their attitude will be at any given age, no matter how many decades ahead that may be, and can forecast reliably that they won't be thinking any different than they do now ! But such conceits are forgiveable in the young, it is merely a reflection of how the human psyche has evolved over millions of years, to only move on to deeper matters when the more pressing concerns of becoming established in the world have been attended to. This truth is manifested in the commonplace 'resistance' among the young to the notion that there could be a kernel of deep truth in the religious traditions, a tendency that an old fraud like Dawkins is only too happy to cash in on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 15, 2012 #22 Share Posted October 15, 2012 It is a perfectly healthy situation to not give a damn about religiosity in youth, it is really a matter that should only be attended to at later stages of life. Needless to say, the arrogance of youth insists they will know exactly what their attitude will be at any given age, no matter how many decades ahead that may be, and can forecast reliably that they won't be thinking any different than they do now ! But such conceits are forgiveable in the young, it is merely a reflection of how the human psyche has evolved over millions of years, to only move on to deeper matters when the more pressing concerns of becoming established in the world have been attended to. This truth is manifested in the commonplace 'resistance' among the young to the notion that there could be a kernel of deep truth in the religious traditions, a tendency that an old fraud like Dawkins is only too happy to cash in on. So you may think, erroneously. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odin11 Posted October 15, 2012 #23 Share Posted October 15, 2012 The blind watchmaker and climbing mount improbable are both referenced in the god delusion to make points against creationist arguments. I bet there are other books which he will reference in the last 100 pages that i haven't read yet. Edit to add that some of those titles have biblical references in the titles as well Those books are about evolution not religion, he may briefly mention it but its not the purpose of the books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted October 15, 2012 #24 Share Posted October 15, 2012 So you may think, erroneously. ;D It is amazing that millenia of wisdom literature of a distinctly religious flavour is superceded by the "wisdom" of twenty-somethings. So it has always been. The old joke about the young guy who noticed his parents getting smarter as he progressed through his twenties is apposite. Wise heads on young shoulders are a rare commodity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted October 15, 2012 #25 Share Posted October 15, 2012 (edited) It is amazing that millenia of wisdom literature of a distinctly religious flavour is superceded by the "wisdom" of twenty-somethings. So it has always been. The old joke about the young guy who noticed his parents getting smarter as he progressed through his twenties is apposite. Wise heads on young shoulders are a rare commodity. I never said that the texts didn't have some wisdom in them. The 'treat your neighbor like yourself' is a great example, but holding to the belief that a god made himself into a man to die on the cross for the sins that his creations did when he gave them free will seems a bit over the top and silly to me. There's a modicum of wisdom in those books, it's much like a fairy tale, they have a moral lesson in them, but when you believe there's a evil witch living in a gingerbread house in the woods, you're taking it too seriously. Edited October 15, 2012 by Hasina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now