Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Environmental satellites are rapidly failing


Saru

Recommended Posts

The failure of older instruments and the lack of replacements could lead to future 'climate blindness'.

Our eyes around Earth are seeing less. US environmental satellites that helped forecasters predict superstorm Sandy are failing. By 2020, the fleet could have just a quarter of the sensors it has today.

arrow3.gifRead more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

i think it happens because of the activity of the sun

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it happens because of the activity of the sun

I doubt the sun would only pick one type of satellite to affect.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It happens because there is no money to replace the older ones, all satellites have a limited life.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, priorities are priorities. We don't need to support our infrastructure, we have many illegitimate and unnecessary wars to wage. Military satellites are OK. We don't need no stinkin' environmental satellites! :cry:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it happens because of the activity of the sun

The sun has been startlingly inactive recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sun has been startlingly inactive recently.

Wonder if its getting ready for a big one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly enough, the claims of cooling in the troposphere from a few years ago that Little Fish was so excited about, were due to a failure to compensate for orbital decay of the satellites. This was discovered and corrected, but Little Fish's sources still haven't update their propaganda.

Climate satellites are actaully quite cheap compared to others. It isn't the cost that's the problem: it's the efforts of scientific illiterates, like Oklahoma's Inhofe, and their support by BIG OIL (among others) that is preventing deployment (Most of the instrumentation alrwady exists.).

Doug

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you don't have to worry. A rebutal to this paper will soon be out as this is totally nonsense.

I know for a fact that EOS are lanuching 19 new satelites in the near future.

NOAA got a 7% increase in the budget for new satelites. And I know they are sending 2 up within the next 3-4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you don't have to worry. A rebutal to this paper will soon be out as this is totally nonsense.

I know for a fact that EOS are lanuching 19 new satelites in the near future.

NOAA got a 7% increase in the budget for new satelites. And I know they are sending 2 up within the next 3-4 years.

There's also the problem that NASA for some strange reason, prefers big, expensive satellites to small cheaper ones. Don't understand that. Maybe it's got something to do with keeping their technicians employed.

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

i think it happens because of the activity of the sun

Quite probably true..

While most are sheilded against X-rays and EM radiation, this year we've had I think about 3 X-class solar flares which bombard them with damaging electro-magnetic radiation.. This damages sensitive electronics..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.