Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


Alphamale06

Recommended Posts

Maybe you need some engineering background or architectural knowledge to really appreciate how intricate and difficult this is to achieve:

Until you see this seeder, it's like trying to argue that an Austin 7 is more refined than a BMW.

zoser44-1_zps10a39734.jpg

As a mechanical engineer, formerly a registered PE, I say that Greek construction/architecture is light years ahead of anything anyone ever did in Peru.

Maybe you need your head examined, if you ever pull it out of there.

Harte

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible I missed it but is there any chemical indication that vitrification happened?

The most detailed analysis on the vitrification done so far.

Indicates strongly use of heat.

http://www.ancient-m...ges_of_peru.pdf

More heresy to the skeptics here.

They tried to burn it.

Edited by zoser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a mechanical engineer, formerly a registered PE, I say that Greek construction/architecture is light years ahead of anything anyone ever did in Peru.

Maybe you need your head examined, if you ever pull it out of there.

Harte

Never going to trust you to build a bridge.

Yet you could never convincingly explain in a hundred years how they achieved that one example of craftsmanship.

Edited by zoser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I wonder if sanding can create enough heat to create the same indications of vitrification.

Try it. Only one way. Let me know when your arm has lost a third of it's skin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try it. Only one way. Let me know when your arm has lost a third of it's skin.

I glanced at a Wiki page about vitrified forts, Clarke tried to reproduce the same affect by piling stones in a bonefire, it wasn't perfect but he didn't have all the time in the world to perfect it.

Could a combination of heating stones and sanding and time create these stone markings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just rhetoric Q mixed with a little frustration.

If this is not moulding then what is it?

I leave the rhetoric to you. I don't post when I'm frustrated because it makes it difficult for me to get my point across.

Nice attempt to try to turn things around. If I can't come up with what it was then you'll claim it must be molding. A tactic worthy of Nopeda. However, that's not how it works. You have made the claim of molding so it is your responsibility to provide any evidence that supports that claim, whether it be a whole or partial mold, or reference to molding in any of the texts available.

You of course aren't obligated nor can you be forced to do so but lack of something to back it up will keep the claim as unevidenced/unsupported belief.

Edited by Quaentum
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I glanced at a Wiki page about vitrified forts, Clarke tried to reproduce the same affect by piling stones in a bonefire, it wasn't perfect but he didn't have all the time in the world to perfect it.

Could a combination of heating stones and sanding and time create these stone markings?

No

Here's the killer to that theory:

Surreal_Ancient_Technology_In_Cuzco_Peru.jpg

Unless someone can find a way of building a fire inside a small diameter hole:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardly going to compete with the Cuzco wall Mr O! Austin 7 versus BMW.

You am right, it am all uglee and mishapun!

bizarro_world.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway off now. See you all tomorrow.

:tu:

got homework to do then? dont worry...just one more day at school before you can have all weekend to reply!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I leave the rhetoric to you. I don't post when I'm frustrated because it makes it difficult for me to get my point across.

Nice attempt to try to turn things around. If I can't come up with what it was then you'll claim it must be molding. A tactic worthy of Nopeda. However, that's not how it works. You have made the claim of molding so it is your responsibility to provide any evidence that supports that claim, whether it be a whole or partial mold, or reference to molding in any of the texts available.

You of course aren't obligated nor can you be forced to do so but lack of something to back it up will keep the claim as unevidenced/unsupported belief.

Fire in the hole!

See above post old boy.

Edited by zoser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No

Here's the killer to that theory:

Surreal_Ancient_Technology_In_Cuzco_Peru.jpg

Unless someone can find a way of building a fire inside a small diameter hole:

Good point. I'll ponder on this one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did they cause all this:

http://www.unexplain...85#entry4615539

I sincerely doubt it.

Stop dreaming Abe.

But you have no answer for the dents I asked you about.

YOU stop dreaming, and YOU try to think of how we now could do the job.

And when you have no idea, ask, but don't assume it must have been aliens.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't get away.

Must be enjoying myself too much.

Any more for any more?

its never hard to bring a hungry pig to a slop bucket is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure; and weathering in caves?

zoser11-1_zpsba09719e.jpg

:whistle:

You tried to argue that with abe before. Do you see a door on that cave? No? Then it's open to the elements, isn't it? And how far in does the shine go? How long was it occupied? Remember, they had to close both Lascaux and the GP because of damage from the mere presence of tourists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear Abe

Now you see it:

zoser43-1_zps84fb99c5.jpg

Now you don't

12Puma_Punku_slabs.JPG

Same artifact; different angle and lighting.

You didn't answer my question.

The stones you showed had many tiny dents. What or who made them? And how?

Vitrification?

No way.

Hammering with cobbles or chisels is the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't answer my question.

The stones you showed had many tiny dents. What or who made them? And how?

Vitrification?

No way.

Hammering with cobbles or chisels is the answer.

And sanding!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do they need to be that smooth? It's rock, not glass.

This shows the vitrification well and refutes any silly sand theories.

zoser59_zps9d8c0d93.jpg

Smooth as silk.

No extreme heat needed.

It was either caused by natural causes (lichens, microbes, and so on), or by applying some chemicals extracted from plants.

I'd really like you to show some proof of aliens or some advanced civilization.

You never did, ever,, all you did was say "Na na na" when we post something to explain how they did it.

Now it's YOUR TURN.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zoser, you think you can go on like this by just ignoring what people posted.

You are just being stubborn.

But let me tell you something: so am I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zoser, I have a question for you.

Why are there one or two protuberances on the bottom edge of many large blocks of stone in the walls you and I posted images of?

Decoration?

Or were they functional?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see zoser has been trolling again. You know he just makes this stuff up or copy/pastes somebody else's ideas just to get a rise out of people right? He has nothing yet likes to claim victory over the skeptics, classic troll.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.