Keel M. Posted January 3, 2013 #26 Share Posted January 3, 2013 You have posted a string of facts and then tied them together in your own way. That's called making assumptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pallidin Posted January 3, 2013 #27 Share Posted January 3, 2013 I wonder if the Forbes "Richest People in the World" would even think of having their money controlled by other's, much less a defunct illuminati. I'll make it easy: Uh... No, No, No No and NO!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted January 3, 2013 #28 Share Posted January 3, 2013 Why would I deny the world is run by a group of elitist pigs. Its based more in fact then fiction from what Ive experienced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted January 3, 2013 #29 Share Posted January 3, 2013 (edited) Rothschild own all the banks you just stated by the way. They certainly own HSBC and Barclays. They just don't "run" them. Evidence? Proof? Or are we expected to just believe you? http://en.wikipedia....or_shareholders - Bank of America http://investors.mor...ajor.html?t=HBC - HSBC http://investors.mor...major.html?t=DB - Deutsche Bank http://investors.mor...ajor.html?t=BCS - Barclays Not seeing a Rothy on any of these lists or on the Boards of any of the investment companies or the banks themselves. If you can find one, feel free to point it out. You do realize that, by law, they have to reveal all of this information, right? Let me guess, though, this is exactly what they want us to believe, right? But yes, technically, you are probably correct. I'm sure there is a Rothy somewhere in the world that owns stock in some of these big banks and, technically, they do own it (a small piece of it). But, you know what? Then so do I as I have some stock from all of the above listed banks in my portfolio. Guess I'm "controlling the world" too, huh? Feel free to bow before me and PM me for an address to send all tributes. Edited January 3, 2013 by Rafterman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keel M. Posted January 3, 2013 #30 Share Posted January 3, 2013 *bows low before Rafterman* Ah ha! Found my contact lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted January 4, 2013 #31 Share Posted January 4, 2013 *bows low before Rafterman* Ah ha! Found my contact lens. Watch below... To see how I am right: Evidence? Proof? Or are we expected to just believe you? http://en.wikipedia....or_shareholders - Bank of America http://investors.mor...ajor.html?t=HBC - HSBC http://investors.mor...major.html?t=DB - Deutsche Bank http://investors.mor...ajor.html?t=BCS - Barclays Not seeing a Rothy on any of these lists or on the Boards of any of the investment companies or the banks themselves. If you can find one, feel free to point it out. You do realize that, by law, they have to reveal all of this information, right? Let me guess, though, this is exactly what they want us to believe, right? But yes, technically, you are probably correct. I'm sure there is a Rothy somewhere in the world that owns stock in some of these big banks and, technically, they do own it (a small piece of it). But, you know what? Then so do I as I have some stock from all of the above listed banks in my portfolio. Guess I'm "controlling the world" too, huh? Feel free to bow before me and PM me for an address to send all tributes. Watch this: I'm going to do it with just your first link and the first share holder to prove my point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_America#Major_shareholders First/highest shareholder: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Street_Corporation The company was started by a group of directors and officers from the Third National Bank https://www.thirdnationalbank.com/ Read right under their logo/name on their website.... Anyway other banks have nothing to do with this, because the fact is it's the link between the government and the central bank of the country, Banks like HSBC and Barcleys etc have nothing to do with central banks and putting our government in debt.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvKGPllhxo Please enlighten me though, as to why Al Qaeda was supported financially and with air support from the UK and US to take out Gaddafi/Libya and why was a central bank implemented the moment they had taken over? Same with Afghanistan and Iraq.... These are facts that we implemented central banks the moment we had control either ourselves or through "terrorists". The central banks in those 3 examples are owned by the Rothschild's... So please explain to me why that happened and why Al Qaeda allowed it when they run Libya now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keel M. Posted January 7, 2013 #32 Share Posted January 7, 2013 (edited) You know, I considered asking what any of this has to do with some no-name rapper being a member of a non-existent group, but I doubt I'd get an answer. And I don't relish another week of talking to a wall. Edited January 7, 2013 by Lady Kasey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellapenella Posted January 7, 2013 #33 Share Posted January 7, 2013 Me? I don't believe int he Illuminati So nice little insult there. I also don't believe in any of the BS you just posted so well done on completely avoiding my simple question and having a rant that has nothing to do with me what so ever. Please answer my question this time though; Do you deny and elite group of people running the world? (The people who run the national banking system) At this stage in the game when anyone mentions the word Illuminati I think people should actually now by now what someone means in utilizing that particular word, like even children know what someone is referring to these days when they hear that word . Sorry but I find it very arrogant for anyone to pretend that there are absolutely no elitest controlling the currency and the world by means of it.Personally i learned it's best to ignore and stay clear of people that want to fight with anyone that has a greater understanding of whats going on.There's evil people that don't care a thing about the rest of us and yeah they control societies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ali smack Posted January 20, 2013 #34 Share Posted January 20, 2013 I don't think he was killed by the illuminati. I don't think illuminati exist, nor do i think jay z is part of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ant cee Posted December 6, 2013 #35 Share Posted December 6, 2013 i believe that steez was a mastermind nd if the illuminati killed him then i know he'll be safe in heaven ... if he killed himself it was for a reason only he knew. wich the day he killed himself was 12/23/12 add that together nd it equalls what he predicted ... the world to end in 2047 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emma_Acid Posted December 6, 2013 #36 Share Posted December 6, 2013 i believe that steez was a mastermind nd if the illuminati killed him then i know he'll be safe in heaven ... if he killed himself it was for a reason only he knew. wich the day he killed himself was 12/23/12 add that together nd it equalls what he predicted ... the world to end in 2047 Hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reptile Afterbirth Posted December 6, 2013 #37 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Gotta keep an eye out, even on so called 'independant' rap like Macklemore and Immortal Technique, always wanna keep an eye out for calls to revolution, and links to Access Industries. Not even saying these artists are necesarily aware of what they're doing or who their actions serve. http://youtu.be/2w_R8Zhxcwk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erowin Posted December 10, 2013 #38 Share Posted December 10, 2013 99% of all money is owned by a select few, but they are not some mustache twirling society. They are rich b******* who want to keep getting richer and screw over the rest of the population in order to do that. There are plenty of anti-capitalist rappers and counter culture stuff thats targeted at the 1%. However, Illuminati? Nah. Sad thing is, he actually killed himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erowin Posted December 10, 2013 #39 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Ok, I honestly can't figure out if the 'reptile' people are making fun of conspiracy theorists and pretend to believe in reptile people for the sake of trolling, or actually do. And its really hard to believe they actually do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skep B Posted December 10, 2013 #40 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Just wait, eventually it'll turn out it was bird people all along. We'll all have egg on our face literally, probably Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orcseeker Posted December 17, 2013 #41 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Absolutely untrue. The largest Rothschild affiliated entity is Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG, based in Switzerland, with a few billion in assets and primarily focused on mergers and acquisitions. The last Rothschild retired from its board in 2011. And even with its sizable holdings, it's a very small fish in the pond when compared to outfits like Deutsche Bank, Barclays, Bank of America, HSBC, etc. An historically wealthy and powerful family for sure, but the puppetmasters behind the entire world banking system - laughable. This is particularly true given that almost all of the family's historical wealth was confiscated by the Nazis - perhaps giving rise to the oft heard notion that the Rothschilds funded the Holocaust. Here are a few facts about the Rothschilds for those interested. http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4311 Last I read was that the Rothschilds have a lot of their wealth secured in trusts and therefore harder to track. One thing is for sure though. The worlds richest list isn't the worlds richest list. The richest and most powerful people in the world are the ones you see and hear little of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted December 17, 2013 #42 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Watch below... To see how I am right: Watch this: I'm going to do it with just your first link and the first share holder to prove my point: http://en.wikipedia....or_shareholders First/highest shareholder: http://en.wikipedia....eet_Corporation https://www.thirdnationalbank.com/ Read right under their logo/name on their website.... Anyway other banks have nothing to do with this, because the fact is it's the link between the government and the central bank of the country, Banks like HSBC and Barcleys etc have nothing to do with central banks and putting our government in debt.. [media=]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvKGPllhxo[/media] Please enlighten me though, as to why Al Qaeda was supported financially and with air support from the UK and US to take out Gaddafi/Libya and why was a central bank implemented the moment they had taken over? Same with Afghanistan and Iraq.... These are facts that we implemented central banks the moment we had control either ourselves or through "terrorists". The central banks in those 3 examples are owned by the Rothschild's... So please explain to me why that happened and why Al Qaeda allowed it when they run Libya now? Damn Coffey, I didn't even realize you had posted this last year. It looks like you're not even around anymore, but anyway, here's my response. What on Earth are you trying to say here and what, if anything, does this have to do with the Rothschilds? So Bank of America's largest share holder is State Street and State Street was started in the 1700s by officers from Third National Bank - which by the way isn't the Third National Bank you posted in your link. The Third National Bank you linked to is in Missouri (not even a state in the 1700s if my memory serves) and is small community bank owned by Central Bancompany (not a "central bank" as you're defining it) a small-ish bank holding company in Missouri. Again, what does this have to do with Rothschilds and the Illuminati? Their power hinges on the ownership of community banks in Missouri? Perhaps this is a cautionary tale about mindlessly linking to a bunch of wikipedia articles that one really didn't read to try and prove a point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted December 17, 2013 #43 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Last I read was that the Rothschilds have a lot of their wealth secured in trusts and therefore harder to track. One thing is for sure though. The worlds richest list isn't the worlds richest list. The richest and most powerful people in the world are the ones you see and hear little of. I don't think anyone ever claimed that they are not a wealthy family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now