flyingswan Posted June 21, 2014 #3676 Share Posted June 21, 2014 I was not the one that brought up verticle loads... I only pointed out how they are important. What did I overlook? Swan should have spoken up well before now if he wanted to save face. Why should I speak up to save your face? I'm afraid you still have this problem with not making the effort to read and understand other people's posts. Sky mentioned the dynamic vertical loads that occurred in the collapse, but you ignored the word "dynamic" and made all sorts of claims based on that mistake. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendigger0 Posted June 21, 2014 #3677 Share Posted June 21, 2014 (edited) I have also blamed Rice, our intelligence agencies and even the FAA for dropping the ball... Dropping the ball is not unique to the United States... Hitler dropped so many balls... FBI chief, J. Edgar Hoover, dropped the ball... The Soviet Union dropped the ball... Johnson dropped the ball... Nixon dropped the ball. Dropping the ball is nothing new and unfortunately... dropping the ball will continue... SKY >>> you are HILARIOUS ! I haven't seen so many "dropped balls" since the NY METS inaugural season. Is "damage control" a euphemism for "lie"? Now if only Bush, Rice, and Rumsfeld would "I'm sorry..." Everything would be alright... Edited June 21, 2014 by bendigger0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 21, 2014 #3678 Share Posted June 21, 2014 What else do you want to call it... an accident? .I don't think I've ever seen any kind of conformation of this claim, but please post it. I'm interested. That's Newton. Not us. Argue with a dead man. It was a collapse. As far as the dust goes you are simply repeating truther nonsense without knowing anything about the issue. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/results.html The results of analyses completed so far show a consistent picture: the samples are largely composed of gypsum, cellulose, and miscellaneous materials common in a building, with minor asbestiform minerals. Here is an analysis of the dust. http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_dust_composition.html http://archive.org/stream/WorldTradeCenterStacMeetingPresentation-Cancer/WardWTCSTAC_JDedit_djvu.txt What materials were present in the initial dust/smoke? Gypsum (major component of drywallConcrete dust (cement dust, crystalline silica) Glass fragments and man-made vitreous fibers Asbestos Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's) Metals (hexavalent chromium, nickel, arsenic) Volatile organic compounds (benzene) http://www.mvainc.com/2010/03/16/%E2%80%9Cmicroscopical-studies-of-world-trade-center-disaster-dust-particles%E2%80%9D/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/multimedia/wtc/wtc-dust.html# http://wtcreflections.rjlg.com/science/ http://speclab.cr.usgs.gov/wtc/sem1/ As far as Newton goes you're wrong. The notion of least resistance is a truther nonsense. New ton states nothing of the sort. You need to go back and learn what Newtons laws are and what they mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 21, 2014 #3679 Share Posted June 21, 2014 I was not the one that brought up verticle loads... I only pointed out how they are important. What did I overlook? Swan should have spoken up well before now if he wanted to save face. Maybe Flying Swan was stepping by your childish comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 21, 2014 #3680 Share Posted June 21, 2014 And according to Einstein... he is to. But... they "are the natural laws" that work with reality. Once again... argue with a dead man Yes. Toilet paper offers no resistance to a brick. Again your comments are inane and show that you know nothing whatsoever about Newton's laws. There is no physics law about taking the path of least resistance. It's all about least energy. PS you are wrong about the toilet paper and the brick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 21, 2014 #3681 Share Posted June 21, 2014 "Do bullets follow the path of least resistance?" There's you're question. Any body want to step up and say no? The simple answer is NO. You simply have no idea what you are talking about, which is obvious from all of your posts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaptorBites Posted June 21, 2014 #3682 Share Posted June 21, 2014 PS you are wrong about the toilet paper and the brick. Noticed how he dodged such a simple question requiring only a simple answer. It is clear he showed less than a menial understanding of basic physics and reason why he continues to be wrong on such matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 21, 2014 #3683 Share Posted June 21, 2014 SKY >>> you are HILARIOUS ! I haven't seen so many "dropped balls" since the NY METS inaugural season. Is "damage control" a euphemism for "lie"? Now if only Bush, Rice, and Rumsfeld would "I'm sorry..." Everything would be alright... Do you have anything other than innuendos to post? You've posted nothing of interest so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Posted June 21, 2014 #3684 Share Posted June 21, 2014 As this thread seems to have degenerated in to almost nothing but derogatory personal remarks and given that the topic's size is creating slowdowns and is taking way too much time to load up I think it's time for a refresh on this particular subject. Feel free to begin a new thread - this one has run its course. Closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts