Asadora Posted February 16, 2013 #51 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Well, if this is true, then let us hope we do not find any evidence of this DNA in our frozen food departments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keninsc Posted February 16, 2013 #52 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Picky....picky.....picky. Shoot, we been eating horse meat for God knows how long, what's a little Bigfoot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapow53 Posted February 16, 2013 #53 Share Posted February 16, 2013 I could find one w infra red in one pm shift if they were real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCMountains Posted February 17, 2013 #54 Share Posted February 17, 2013 kapow53: That is what I am telling everyone! FLIR, nothing can hide anymore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy hair candy Posted February 17, 2013 #55 Share Posted February 17, 2013 50,000 of them? Kind of hard to sweep that under the rug... How do you hide 50,000 eight foot humanoids? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tantalusw Posted February 17, 2013 #56 Share Posted February 17, 2013 I've asked it before and I'll ask it again why does no one every set up a search line with a bunch of dogs with a group a couple miles down wind those dogs would run everything out of the woods right into the other search line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-C Posted February 17, 2013 #57 Share Posted February 17, 2013 (edited) I've asked it before and I'll ask it again why does no one every set up a search line with a bunch of dogs with a group a couple miles down wind those dogs would run everything out of the woods right into the other search line A couple problems with that: 1. Dogs are terrified of bigfoot and run the opposite direction 2. Bigfoot live underground and so would simply escape, thusly 3.4.5. Bigfoot climb trees, teleport, use infrasound to confuse pursuers 6. Where to set this up? You would have to have the dozens of dogs/people on hand, immediately following a sighting. Otherwise, smart bigfoot would get the jump on you and be long gone or migrated on or at least out be of "flushing" range Anyway, I'm sure there are plenty more excuses that can be thought up...no offense to your idea. It is just how the game is played. Edited February 17, 2013 by QuiteContrary 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkcool Posted March 11, 2013 #58 Share Posted March 11, 2013 50,000 individuals roaming the wilderness of North America.OK, and no one has ever seen one??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keninsc Posted March 11, 2013 #59 Share Posted March 11, 2013 50,000 individuals roaming the wilderness of North America.OK, and no one has ever seen one??? Plenty of people have seen them, just no one can prove they're there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RebelInsanity Posted March 26, 2013 #60 Share Posted March 26, 2013 Dave Paulides is an incredible investigator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Walker Posted March 26, 2013 #61 Share Posted March 26, 2013 (edited) Dave Paulides is an incredible investigator. Personally, I find the idea of suggesting to the families of people who have disappeared that Bigfoot took them to be repugnant... David Paulides is an opportunistic ********!!!! Edited March 26, 2013 by Night Walker 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrLzs Posted March 26, 2013 #62 Share Posted March 26, 2013 {inevitable youtube link deleted with prejudice} Dave Paulides is an incredible investigator. Would you mind outlining your reasoning on that? Your reasoning, not some youtube video.. Feel free to nominate your favorite evidence, with cites and provenance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrLzs Posted March 26, 2013 #63 Share Posted March 26, 2013 And if we're just going to post links, how about this one for a little light reading.. Any questions? If that sort of crowd has anyone in it that is an 'incredible investigator', then .. well... I guess we all have different definitions of 'incredible' and 'investigator'. Me, I prefer the dictionary ones. Seriously, if anyone reading this is sucked in by these sort of money-grabbing scammers: 1. You are exactly the sort of person who they are targeting 2. You should probably consider picking a different hobby 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustygh Posted March 26, 2013 #64 Share Posted March 26, 2013 Personally, I find the idea of suggesting to the families of people who have disappeared that Bigfoot took them to be repugnant... David Paulides is an opportunistic ********!!!! I agree, but that's what people want I guess. Look at all the paranormal crap on TV sucking millions of dollars from thousands of people. Then there is religions and billions of people that just believe. Most humans don't seem to want real fact or to actually think. Just make a big show and say its so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustygh Posted March 26, 2013 #65 Share Posted March 26, 2013 [media=] [/media]Dave Paulides is an incredible investigator. The guys a quack! His background is in police work and security. While dealing with these people he realized how many gullible people are out there and decided his platform would be Bigfoot. Its a joke. As many as 50,000 please lets be serious for just one moment. Sheesh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted March 26, 2013 #66 Share Posted March 26, 2013 (edited) I tuned in to Coast to Coast, America a week ago last sunday and listened to Paulides. Paulides has written a book called "Missing 411 (volume 3)" and what he said that night fascinated me. It is all about missing people and how very distinct areas in NA have big spikes in the number of missing peoples going back into the 1800's. THe biggest spike was in Yosemite. Anyway, Paulides originally thought BF was tied into it because of the terrain of the spiked areas but has since back tracked because he has found European countries with missing people where the data also spikes in certain areas, but of course, there are no BF'/Sasquatches in western europe. People have written to Paulides and told him it is not BigFoot that is responsible, it is aliens - particularly, "reptilians" - which Paulides claims he has no knowledge of. (nor do I) “This isn’t an animal. This is a subspecies of a human, and we believe they travel in groups,” Paulides said. The North American Indians have been saying "BF is human-like, not animal" for eons and eons. I suppose, though, that it has to be said by some Great White Christian folk in order to be taken even somewhat seriously by members of society "at large".. Edited March 26, 2013 by Earl.Of.Trumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovsasn Posted March 26, 2013 #67 Share Posted March 26, 2013 Dave Paulides is a great researcher/author, just read his work. For starters "The Hoopa Project" Hancock House Publishers.Cost maybe twenty dollars and some change. It's a great read. All of his books are great reads. His hard approach to his research shines in his work (books) nabigfootsearch.com his website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustygh Posted March 27, 2013 #68 Share Posted March 27, 2013 (edited) Earl.Of.Trumps. "People have written to Paulides and told him it is not BigFoot that is responsible, it is aliens - particularly, "reptilians" - which Paulides claims he has no knowledge of. (nor do I)" Is this what we toss in to now validate BF? You toss this in as if these alien people are crazy so that's why we BF people are not and are correct. From what facts you posted in this he has proven his theory wrong with other missing person stats from Europe. The end. Come back with new facts Edited March 27, 2013 by rustygh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everdred Posted March 27, 2013 #69 Share Posted March 27, 2013 I tuned in to Coast to Coast, America a week ago last sunday and listened to Paulides. Paulides has written a book called "Missing 411 (volume 3)" and what he said that night fascinated me. It is all about missing people and how very distinct areas in NA have big spikes in the number of missing peoples going back into the 1800's. THe biggest spike was in Yosemite. Anyway, Paulides originally thought BF was tied into it because of the terrain of the spiked areas but has since back tracked because he has found European countries with missing people where the data also spikes in certain areas, but of course, there are no BF'/Sasquatches in western europe. People have written to Paulides and told him it is not BigFoot that is responsible, it is aliens - particularly, "reptilians" - which Paulides claims he has no knowledge of. (nor do I) “This isn’t an animal. This is a subspecies of a human, and we believe they travel in groups,” Paulides said. The North American Indians have been saying "BF is human-like, not animal" for eons and eons. I suppose, though, that it has to be said by some Great White Christian folk in order to be taken even somewhat seriously by members of society "at large".. Reptilians! I do believe that's Icke territory. I wonder if the reptilians have taken over bigfoot society just like they did with our own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evancj Posted March 27, 2013 #70 Share Posted March 27, 2013 [media=] [/media]Dave Paulides is an incredible investigator. This explains what happened to Jimmy Hoffa, mystery solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xYlvax Posted March 27, 2013 #71 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Sounds like a load of nonsense to me. Great, now the load of the country that remains gullible is going to proclaim bigfoot exists, off of this. 50,000? Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lava_Lady Posted March 27, 2013 #72 Share Posted March 27, 2013 This announcement is a bit premature... they should have clear and definitive evidence to back it up before making any statements otherwise they lose a lot of creditability. Very frustrating to say the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-C Posted March 27, 2013 #73 Share Posted March 27, 2013 [media=] [/media]Dave Paulides is an incredible investigator. I'm wondering why he seems to take credit for collecting the bigfoot samples? It's all so corn-fusing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Posted March 27, 2013 #74 Share Posted March 27, 2013 This announcement is a bit premature... they should have clear and definitive evidence to back it up before making any statements otherwise they lose a lot of creditability. Very frustrating to say the least. The sad thing is that no matter how much credibility these people lose, there are always others gullible enough and ready to gobble up the crap they are spouting. It's a vicious cycle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scowl Posted March 27, 2013 #75 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Odd that there are no reports of attempted kidnappings by Bigfoot. I guess it's real easy for a nine foot 800 pound creature to sneak up on people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now