Hasina Posted February 27, 2013 #1 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Will the Voting Rights Act survive the Supreme Court? For nearly 50 years, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 has served as one of the government's most effective tools for rooting out discrimination against minority voters. Today, the Supreme Court will consider whether the law's methods are still constitutional. The court today will hear arguments in the case of Shelby County v. Holder, which calls into question one of the law's key provisions: Section 5. That section of the Voting Rights Act requires states with a history of racial discrimination to have any changes to their voting laws pre-approved by the Justice Department's civil rights division or the D.C. federal court. There's no question voting rights have improved dramatically since the law was passed -- gone are the days of literacy tests and poll taxes, designed to keep minority voters from the polls. Given the significant improvements, Alabama's Shelby County argues that the Section 5 "pre-clearance" requirement "exacts a heavy, unprecedented" cost on the rights that states and local jurisdictions have to craft their own laws. Nine states are required to get pre-clearance under Section 5, as are certain jurisdictions in seven other states. Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57571493/will-the-voting-rights-act-survive-the-supreme-court/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Commander Travis Posted February 27, 2013 #2 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I do can't help thinking sometimes that literacy tests, for all voters, or tests to ascertain that a person has at least some knowledge of the way that Government works, would be a very good idea before anyone could be eligible for a Vote. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted February 27, 2013 Author #3 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I do can't help thinking sometimes that literacy tests, for all voters, or tests to ascertain that a person has at least some knowledge of the way that Government works, would be a very good idea before anyone could be eligible for a Vote. People would still call it racist. Why? The majority of illiterate people happen to be minorities. http://nces.ed.gov/ssbr/pages/adultliteracy.asp?IndID=32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan'O Posted February 27, 2013 #4 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Well they just let a bunch of admin voters out. http://news.yahoo.com/dhs-releasing-illegal-immigrants-sequester-135405822.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted February 27, 2013 #5 Share Posted February 27, 2013 (edited) I always thought it was kind of weird that states had different voting laws for elections. One would think that there would be a universal system. Edited February 27, 2013 by Gromdor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted February 27, 2013 #6 Share Posted February 27, 2013 The ironic thing is that EVERY state has a history of racial discrimination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preacherman76 Posted February 27, 2013 #7 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Voting rights?????? LOL, THATS the joke. No one has voting rights. You have a choice between bank rule, or bank rule. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now