AsteroidX Posted March 10, 2013 #1 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Did she just make a mispeak or did she disclose some /classified/ info...oops. Either way this ones already viral. Check about the 24 second mark and listen well my UM friends. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA-xkPXbFa8&feature=player_detailpage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Serenity Posted March 10, 2013 #2 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Idiot. Killing is against the law or did she skip that lesson? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellar Posted March 10, 2013 #3 Share Posted March 10, 2013 I dont think this is a Freudian slip revealing any classified info... I think she was just trying to use an analogy that just didn't come out the way she thought it would. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted March 10, 2013 Author #4 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Politicians are held to a higher standard when speaking. She knows shes on a touchey subject. But yes Stellar. I think your close to right. But **** if the Constitution had a "freudian" slip in it wed be a different world as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted March 10, 2013 #5 Share Posted March 10, 2013 I dont think this is a Freudian slip revealing any classified info... I think she was just trying to use an analogy that just didn't come out the way she thought it would. No, she knows what she said. She's playing to a particular crowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickian Posted March 11, 2013 #6 Share Posted March 11, 2013 She didn't say murder is legal. She said that anyone who owns a large magazine clip is someone who likes to hunt humans. Big difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted March 11, 2013 #7 Share Posted March 11, 2013 She didn't say murder is legal. She said that anyone who owns a large magazine clip is someone who likes to hunt humans. Big difference. She said this. And yet it’s legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted March 11, 2013 Author #8 Share Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) ----------- Edited March 11, 2013 by AsteroidX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickian Posted March 11, 2013 #9 Share Posted March 11, 2013 She said this. And yet it’s legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines She said this right before it; ... there are state laws that prohibit hunting ducks with more than 3 rounds, and yet it's legal to hunt humans with 15 round, 30 round, even 150 round magazines. In the context she used, she likened the ownership of large round magazines to serial killers who prefer to hunt humans rather than wild animals and goes on to claim that civilians have no right to large magazines since they'd have to take time to reload when in a shootout with the police and other brave individuals(I'm assuming military) giving the police/others an advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted March 11, 2013 #10 Share Posted March 11, 2013 She said this right before it; In the context she used, she likened the ownership of large round magazines to serial killers who prefer to hunt humans rather than wild animals and goes on to claim that civilians have no right to large magazines since they'd have to take time to reload when in a shootout with the police and other brave individuals(I'm assuming military) giving the police/others an advantage. Oh c'mon. In context she said one thing true and one thing false. Your likening it to your own opinion. She wanted you to do that. You know it's a lie and it's a blatant deception. She shouldn't speak in metaphors when debating a serious bill proposal. She wanted people to defend her lie. Face it, you're doing just that? Likening a duck hunting law to a nonexistent law and you justify it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted March 11, 2013 Author #11 Share Posted March 11, 2013 In the context she used Wickian SaidDiane Feinstein actually said And yet it’s legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines Make whatever conjecture you want but we will then throw out every politicians every word as we cant be sure of the context. Shooting humans with whatever capacity magazine is illegal unless it falls under some specific laws by specific States. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickian Posted March 11, 2013 #12 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Just for the record I agree she's an idiot and I don't agree with her, but I think it's jumping to conclusions to say she claimed hunting humans is legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted March 11, 2013 Author #13 Share Posted March 11, 2013 We need to hold politicians accountable for what they say. It can be turned into something more. The Jews didnt believe what Hitler was doing either. It couldnt be possible. But it was. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lightly Posted March 11, 2013 #14 Share Posted March 11, 2013 It was a stupid Mis statement. I'm sure she meant that the large clips are legal. I think she knows that hunting humans .. isn't? .. pop another pharmaceutical Diane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preacherman76 Posted March 11, 2013 #15 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Everyone knows its illegal to hunt humans, unless you are the US government, then its OK. Forget you feinstein 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted March 11, 2013 #16 Share Posted March 11, 2013 I don't agree that she didn't mean to say what she said. She knows her statement was false but she said it for a reason. It's an emotional statement meant to evoke emotion as opposed to reason. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNvRG Posted March 11, 2013 #17 Share Posted March 11, 2013 She's an all around idiot. It's illegal to kill anyone whether you have 1 round or a 250 round belt. She should retire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rashore Posted March 11, 2013 #18 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Did she just make a mispeak or did she disclose some /classified/ info...oops. Either way this ones already viral. Check about the 24 second mark and listen well my UM friends. [media=]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA-xkPXbFa8&feature=player_detailpage[/media] Where/when is this from? I was trying to find a fuller clip of the speech, but it looks like all on Youtube is just this bit.. And I can't find anything except this clip being repeated... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted March 11, 2013 #19 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Where/when is this from? I was trying to find a fuller clip of the speech, but it looks like all on Youtube is just this bit.. And I can't find anything except this clip being repeated... About 3 or 4 days ago. I found it as a new headline on theblaze.com a few days back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bama13 Posted March 12, 2013 #20 Share Posted March 12, 2013 (edited) Maybe if their approval rating slips below 30% we should be able to legally hunt Congresspersons. Edited March 12, 2013 by Bama13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamato Posted March 13, 2013 #21 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Hunting humans with 30+ round magazines? She's referring to Obama's foreign policy. Totally legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinxdom Posted March 13, 2013 #22 Share Posted March 13, 2013 looks at bounty hunting license..... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted March 13, 2013 Author #23 Share Posted March 13, 2013 (edited) Its part of the ongoing Senate Judiciary Committee on Gun Control (Judiciary Committee SH-216) Every moment of it should be recorded somewhere but only highlights get attention. The excerpt in this blog is from January 30th. So your guess is as good as mine as to when she made that statement. Google wasnt very friendly on the topic of this committee. . Committee is very different form a Senate floor vote. http://www.weapon-bl...mmittee-sh-216/ Edited March 13, 2013 by AsteroidX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted March 13, 2013 #24 Share Posted March 13, 2013 What's the difference on when she said it anyways. At no point in modern history has it been legal to hunt humans. Besides, the context is quite clear that this is about today's debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted March 14, 2013 #25 Share Posted March 14, 2013 (edited) The witch likens gun ownership to child pornography. Just like with the op topic she has a reason for saying what she says and intentionally at that. The point is suggestive association. Suggesting guns with something sickening and people will associate the two. It's hypnotism 101. This isn't the first time I've heard the left associate guns with child molesting. Also she condemns Ted Cruz for "treating her like a sixth grader" when in fact he didn't and that's how she wants to treat responsible adults across the nation. Scum bag. His questions are reasonable and worthy of a thoughtful reply. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/14/ted-cruz-battles-dianne-feinstein-in-heated-senate-showdown-over-guns-im-not-a-6th-grader/ Edited March 14, 2013 by -Mr_Fess- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now