questionmark Posted March 15, 2013 #1 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Democrats support it, Republicans don't. Sen. Dianne Feinstein makes a passionate appeal for her legislation, but it's not likely to pass the full Senate. WASHINGTON — Despite its long odds in the full Senate, a federal ban on assault weapons cleared a Democratic-run committee Thursday on a party-line vote. "I've looked at bodies that have been shot with these weapons," the bill's chief sponsor, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, told Senate Judiciary Committee colleagues. "How many times does this have to happen?" Read more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A rather obscure Bassoon Posted March 15, 2013 #2 Share Posted March 15, 2013 I think Obama has more chance of becoming the next pope,than this bill has being passed as law. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohio traveler Posted March 15, 2013 #3 Share Posted March 15, 2013 I think Obama has more chance of becoming the next pope,than this bill has being passed as law. True. It has little chance in the Senate. And no chance in the House. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted March 15, 2013 #4 Share Posted March 15, 2013 I'm really mad it passed the Senate. I'd like to call Fein-stein (FIRE BAD!) something bad... I doubt this bill will pass the House, as they don't have the required votes to get it to pass even among the Democrats. I doubt they will get an "Assualt" (It's big and scary looking!) Weapons Ban. I wouldn't mind tougher laws on gun trafficking and obtaining a weapon illegally. But, I'm against more gun regristration. The laws on gun registration that we have on the books are good enough, and alot tougher then what most people think. Even if it DOES pass (which I doubt) it will not be enforcable. MOLON LABE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted March 15, 2013 #5 Share Posted March 15, 2013 It has little chance of passing correct. But it will likely make it out of the Senate which will further polarize and raise fears in the USA. So it would be best if it does die in the Senate for the good of the People. Fear mongering by Govmnt has reached a fever level. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lightly Posted March 16, 2013 #6 Share Posted March 16, 2013 (edited) i'll go out on a limb.. and say that somehow, a ban on assault type weapons and clips.. will pass. .. and that decision has already been made. *watch and learn Edited March 16, 2013 by lightly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohio traveler Posted March 16, 2013 #7 Share Posted March 16, 2013 It has little chance of passing correct. But it will likely make it out of the Senate which will further polarize and raise fears in the USA. So it would be best if it does die in the Senate for the good of the People. Fear mongering by Govmnt has reached a fever level. I'm not sure Harry Reid will let it come to a vote. For some strange odd reason that liberal kook has a very good record for voting pro-gun. He used to even have an A rating from the NRA. I could never figure that one out. They must line his pockets pretty heavily is all I can figure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted April 8, 2013 #8 Share Posted April 8, 2013 Update: Its on the Senate floor today http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=qJxhDAMOlKk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praetorian-legio XIII Posted April 8, 2013 #9 Share Posted April 8, 2013 i'll go out on a limb.. and say that somehow, a ban on assault type weapons and clips.. will pass. .. and that decision has already been made. *watch and learn Well you have my attention, so, Who do you figure has already made that decision? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michelle Posted April 8, 2013 #10 Share Posted April 8, 2013 I'm not sure Harry Reid will let it come to a vote. For some strange odd reason that liberal kook has a very good record for voting pro-gun. He used to even have an A rating from the NRA. I could never figure that one out. They must line his pockets pretty heavily is all I can figure. Most of the Democrats I know own guns. They aren't all anti gun by any means. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted April 8, 2013 #11 Share Posted April 8, 2013 I'm not sure Harry Reid will let it come to a vote. For some strange odd reason that liberal kook has a very good record for voting pro-gun. He used to even have an A rating from the NRA. I could never figure that one out. They must line his pockets pretty heavily is all I can figure. Surprised me as well. But the cash has to be a big part of it. Or maybe the majority of Nevadans would run him out of town on a rail if he did otherwise 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 9, 2013 #12 Share Posted April 9, 2013 The politicians that support "gun control" have ARMED body guards.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjadude Posted April 10, 2013 #13 Share Posted April 10, 2013 The politicians that support "gun control" have ARMED body guards.... so? what's your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 10, 2013 #14 Share Posted April 10, 2013 so? what's your point? My point? How about they give up their armed bodyguards, then we will talk about "gun control".... Unlike them, I don't have millions of dollars to hire people to protect me....so I'll keep my guns. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonshadow60 Posted April 10, 2013 #15 Share Posted April 10, 2013 You can laugh at this old lady if you will, but if it doesn't pass this time, it will soon. Socialism and "the collective" are marching across my shadow and I feel them coming. Soon we will be as in the EU, with no freedom at all. Doesn't matter which of the two major parties are in power. They are all the same, no matter what promises they make. This is no longer a representatifve government, unless you are big business and can pay for what you want. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 10, 2013 #16 Share Posted April 10, 2013 You can laugh at this old lady if you will, but if it doesn't pass this time, it will soon. Socialism and "the collective" are marching across my shadow and I feel them coming. Soon we will be as in the EU, with no freedom at all. Doesn't matter which of the two major parties are in power. They are all the same, no matter what promises they make. This is no longer a representatifve government, unless you are big business and can pay for what you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drayno Posted April 10, 2013 #17 Share Posted April 10, 2013 You can laugh at this old lady if you will, but if it doesn't pass this time, it will soon. Socialism and "the collective" are marching across my shadow and I feel them coming. Soon we will be as in the EU, with no freedom at all. Doesn't matter which of the two major parties are in power. They are all the same, no matter what promises they make. This is no longer a representatifve government, unless you are big business and can pay for what you want. The Socialist leaders and so-called 'Progressives' of this country are destroying the powers that limit our Government. They are labeling believers in popular sovereignty as terrorists. Any one who believes in American principles is the enemy to them. A total gun ban is the agenda of the Democratic party; they're preparing for economic collapse to implement their next stage of plans. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted April 11, 2013 #18 Share Posted April 11, 2013 watched news yesterday, congress reached desision on background checks. all transactions with ffl will be subject to background checks. private transactions will be exempt from background checks. lmao, that is how the things are now, and have been for decades. these shmucks did absolutely nothing. but claim a huge victory, lmao. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 11, 2013 #19 Share Posted April 11, 2013 (edited) I'm such a political news junkie... Newtown families: Senators who filibuster gun background check bill should be ‘ashamed’ Dozens of relatives of victims in the Dec. 14 shooting spree in Newtown, Conn., released a statement Thursday shaming senators who attempted to block, or filibuster, a vote on legislation that would expand criminal background checks for gun purchases. Senators voted Thursday morning on whether to block the legislation crafted by West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin and Pennsylvania Republican Pat Toomey from coming to a vote. While 31 senators, including two Democrats, did vote to block the bill, a bipartisan group of 68 senators from both parties voted to allow a debate and vote on the bill to proceed. "The Senators who have vowed to filibuster this bill should be ashamed of their attempt to silence efforts to prevent the next American tragedy," reads the statement, signed by more than 33 relatives of the 20 children and 6 educators killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School. "We thank Senators Manchin and Toomey for coming together to honor the memory of the victims of Sandy Hook, and we urge their colleagues in Congress to join them." Check out: http://news.yahoo.co...--election.html Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Mike Lee of Utah are among those who voted against debating the bill on Thursday. Cruz defended the tactic to radio host Laura Ingraham on Wednesday, saying there should be a 60-vote threshold before a debate on curbing gun rights. Democrats hold 55 seats in the Senate, but 60 senators must vote before a bill can be debated. According to the Dallas Morning News, Cruz spoke by phone with Erica Lafferty, Hochsprung's daughter, this week, to hear her concerns. “He certainly feels for her loss,” Cruz's spokeswoman told the paper. “But the legislation being considered right now wouldn’t have prevented that tragedy.” The National Rifle Association has also said that tighter background checks would not have prevented Newtown shooter Adam Lanza from accessing weapons, since they were reportedly purchased by his mother, who had no criminal record. Go Senators! Edited April 11, 2013 by Kowalski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavenHawk Posted April 11, 2013 #20 Share Posted April 11, 2013 watched news yesterday, congress reached desision on background checks. all transactions with ffl will be subject to background checks. private transactions will be exempt from background checks. lmao, that is how the things are now, and have been for decades. these shmucks did absolutely nothing. but claim a huge victory, lmao. What a crock! This is a setup plain and clear. Now when this *law* fails (as everyone knows it will), there'll be more ammo for removing our Rights to our weapons. This agenda to dismantle the Constitution and the Bill of Rights needs to end, NOW! Leave MY money, MY kids, and MY guns alone!!!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted April 11, 2013 #21 Share Posted April 11, 2013 it didn't take too long Oops! New York State Police Admit to Major Mistake in Gun Confiscation Case In a surprising turnaround, New York State Police have admitted that they made a mistake when they confiscated the guns and suspended the permit of an Erie County resident on the grounds of mental health. ....... "When you write a piece of legislation in a vacuum, without having hearings, without talking to people about how it's going to implemented in the real world -- without jeopardizing people's rights, and putting an individual like this through a nightmarish experience, and infringe on their rights, you have to go back to the drawing board," he said. "And I encourage the legislative leadership here and mostly our governor to take a step back and say 'we didn't get it right' and let's change this." http://news.yahoo.com/oops-york-state-police-admit-big-mistake-gun-142418295.html what makes me lmao, is that they want legislative leadership to admit their mistake, lol, that wont happen, they will blame everyone else around, but wont admit their mistake. happens all the time. also if they have to fix this legestlation, there are thousands more in need of fixing, if they admit those are wrong too, ppl will ask very legit question, wtf are they doing??? oh wait, we already ask that question. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 11, 2013 #22 Share Posted April 11, 2013 (edited) Senator Says Universal Background Checks Could Lead to National Registry Nothing short of a rejection of any gun bill should be acceptable to the American people if they wish to retain a modicum of liberty Senator Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, expressed his concern on the Senate floor about a universal firearm background check system now under consideration in Congress. “Some of the proposals, like for example – universal background checks – would allow the federal government to surveil law-abiding citizens who exercise their Constitutional rights,” Lee said. “One of the provisions we expect to see in the bill based on what we saw in the Judiciary Committee – on which I sit – would allow the Attorney General of the United States (Eric Holder) to promulgate regulations that could lead to a national registry system for guns. Something my constituents in Utah are very concerned about, and understandably so.” Senator Lee said the government has no authority to monitor the legal exercise of constitutional rights. From: http://www.infowars....ional-registry/ Everytime you give an inch to the government, they take a mile.... Edited April 11, 2013 by Kowalski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MstrMsn Posted April 12, 2013 #23 Share Posted April 12, 2013 (edited) watched news yesterday, congress reached desision on background checks. all transactions with ffl will be subject to background checks. private transactions will be exempt from background checks. lmao, that is how the things are now, and have been for decades. these shmucks did absolutely nothing. but claim a huge victory, lmao. That's how it is in my state now (as it is in many states). Still doesn't stop the criminals from getting guns (cuz, you know, criminals really do walk into a gun store and actually pay full price plus sales tax - if applicable ). Edited April 12, 2013 by MstrMsn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now