Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Why the US Shouldn't Get Involved

and-then

By and-then
in Israel, Palestine and the Middle-East

 Share

Recommended Posts

Black Red Devil Enlightened

Black Red Devil

Posted
   #1 
Posted

These are my personal feelings - not the policy of my government - they don't ask my advice. When innocents suffer we ALL are degraded - no matter who is doing the killing. But to say there is NEVER a just reason to wage war is to accept slavery eventually - no thanks.

You made a comment on a forum, I responded by agreeing but only if your Govt was consistent in it's approach. Who suggested anything about the Govt seeking your advice? So when is there a just reason? Why boots on the ground in Iraq, equipment in Libya and nothing in Syria?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 
  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • and-then

    8

  • Just Dave

    5

  • Frank Merton

    5

  • Black Red Devil

    4

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Frank Merton
Frank Merton

Isolationism by any country doesn't work. Thinking one should just walk away and let them kill each other will not cause them to leave you alone, but in fact tends to do the opposite. Everyone every

and-then
and-then

It makes no difference to me who supplied Sarin to the "rebels" if they in fact used it. And I completely agree it might have been them and not Assad. I have said all along that no matter WHO "wins"

Frank Merton
Frank Merton

Probably it should not be the US, but I think anyone who is able to has a moral obligation to put a stop to this carnage. To me this means the Arabs and the Turks.

and-then Eternal

+and-then

Posted
  • Author
   #2 
Posted

You made a comment on a forum, I responded by agreeing but only if your Govt was consistent in it's approach. Who suggested anything about the Govt seeking your advice? So when is there a just reason? Why boots on the ground in Iraq, equipment in Libya and nothing in Syria?

You began your comment by saying you doubted me. I reiterated that it was my personal feeling. Syria is Russia's client. Syria is a civil war that has no solution that can have a good outcome for the west. Syria is a blood sponge and if it does not cool down naturally it may spark a regional or even global war. THAT makes it quite different from the others you mentioned. For my part I have said that Iraq was a mistake and Libya was just wrong. But I believe the US went into a support of the Libyan action as support for Britain and France - who need/want the oil there. We are allies after all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Black Red Devil Enlightened

Black Red Devil

Posted
   #3 
Posted

You began your comment by saying you doubted me. I reiterated that it was my personal feeling. Syria is Russia's client. Syria is a civil war that has no solution that can have a good outcome for the west. Syria is a blood sponge and if it does not cool down naturally it may spark a regional or even global war. THAT makes it quite different from the others you mentioned. For my part I have said that Iraq was a mistake and Libya was just wrong. But I believe the US went into a support of the Libyan action as support for Britain and France - who need/want the oil there. We are allies after all.

Bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.