Junior Chubb Posted June 26, 2013 #1 Share Posted June 26, 2013 I have been reading some of the stories circulating about Lee Rigby's death being a 'False flag Operation' etc etc. From the sources I have researched most of the arguments are quite weak but a few leave me with questions, one area I have had trouble with are references to the police car the two assailants approached before being shot. Apparently the markings on the roof of this car are not correct, or parts are missing. I am not familiar with what should be on the roof of a Police car and just assumed the roof markings are different due to it being an armed response unit as opposed to a highway traffic vehicle. Here is an image of the vehicle... Sorry about the poor quality, I was hoping somebody who has already come across this could help out rather than having to use this low quality image for reference or maybe someone with forces experience could point me in the right direction. What is missing, or wrong with the marking on the roof of this car? Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted June 26, 2013 #2 Share Posted June 26, 2013 I think 'ordinary' police cars just have a large number on the top. Are we sure that photo hasn't been altered? I have to admit that this is one situation when it never occurred to me that it could be a 'conspiracy'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted June 26, 2013 #3 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Nothing seems to be missing, there is a better qualify image of that car with the aerial shot. Here the BMW, as you can see the markings are on the side and not at the top And this one, markings on the side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted June 26, 2013 #4 Share Posted June 26, 2013 My mistake, the writing is blue at the top, same code but blue, the letters are on the left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted June 26, 2013 #5 Share Posted June 26, 2013 My mistake, the writing is blue at the top, same code but blue, the letters are on the left This is not the same vehicle as the one in the OP. It's in the wrong position for a start. The one the perpetrators approached was positioned just out of sight, bottom right of the above photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted June 26, 2013 #6 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Yes it is, here better photo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted June 26, 2013 #7 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Okay, my memory was playing tricks on me! By the markings on the road it most likely is the same car ...... it's just that the boot is open in the top pic. In that case it would seem that the top of the car looks 'wrong' simply because it is so out of focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted June 26, 2013 #8 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Nothing seems to be missing, there is a better qualify image of that car with the aerial shot. Here the BMW, as you can see the markings are on the side and not at the top And this one, markings on the side It's difficult to tell from this angle, but these cars don't appear to have large numbers/letters on the roof ....... I thought they all had them(ambulances too), so that they could be identified from the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junior Chubb Posted June 26, 2013 Author #9 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Thanks for the better quality images RN So on the roof we have a 02 near the front and H?Z nearer the middle. I wonder what was meant by the markings being wrong? Hi Ouija everything has a 'conspiracy' angle these days. The pics are the same car, the scenery is confusing from different angles especially as most of what we saw at first is what was happening 20 yards up the road where the body was, from a different view. I have just found some clearer pics to post... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junior Chubb Posted June 26, 2013 Author #10 Share Posted June 26, 2013 (edited) Here are some better images of the vehicle in question... Letters on roof and left nearside rear are HMZ, even the number plate is crystal clear. So is there anything wrong with these markings? They look just like the ones below from another vehicle, but are missing the darker outline maybe. Edited June 26, 2013 by Junior Chubb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSS Posted June 26, 2013 #11 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Here are some better images of the vehicle in question... Letters on roof and left nearside rear are HMZ, even the number plate is crystal clear. So is there anything wrong with these markings? They look just like the ones below from another vehicle, but are missing the darker outline maybe. The colour of the lettering, whether it has outlines or not (or paint layout of the vehicle in general actually) changes from force to force. The only consistencies across all forces are the lettering, and the coloured shapes - square, circle, triangle etc...one shape for dogs, traffic cop, firemens etc, they all have a different coloured shape on the roof. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junior Chubb Posted June 27, 2013 Author #12 Share Posted June 27, 2013 The colour of the lettering, whether it has outlines or not (or paint layout of the vehicle in general actually) changes from force to force. The only consistencies across all forces are the lettering, and the coloured shapes - square, circle, triangle etc...one shape for dogs, traffic cop, firemens etc, they all have a different coloured shape on the roof. Thanks SS, so nothing seems wrong with the markings on this vehicle then. Looks like its another point to strike of my list... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted June 27, 2013 #13 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Damn, cops drive Beemers in the UK. Big pimpin for sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted June 27, 2013 #14 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Damn, cops drive Beemers in the UK. Big pimpin for sure. Er ........ shouldn't that be " fo' sho' "? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junior Chubb Posted June 27, 2013 Author #15 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Er ........ shouldn't that be " fo' sho' "? I Didn't have you down as a grammar Nazi. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now