hunray Posted July 24, 2013 #1 Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) Object size indicated by the reflected image: http://hunray.xp3.biz/WC.htm google map search FIGU Edited July 24, 2013 by hunray 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunray Posted July 24, 2013 Author #2 Share Posted July 24, 2013 "Space-time Jump" Theory to Practice: http://hunray.xp3.biz/SJ-.htm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthseeker007 Posted July 24, 2013 #3 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Interesting!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted July 24, 2013 #4 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Guess they look more believable than his other fake photos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunray Posted July 25, 2013 Author #5 Share Posted July 25, 2013 http://www.zamandayolculuk.com/cetinbal/htmldosya1/vriltechnology.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunray Posted July 25, 2013 Author #6 Share Posted July 25, 2013 Forget Star Trek "Warp Drive & force fields (shields)". [speed of light in hyperspace is 10^7000 times the speed of light in material world.] http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_119 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetpumper Posted July 25, 2013 #7 Share Posted July 25, 2013 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted July 25, 2013 #8 Share Posted July 25, 2013 You Gotta Love the Mylar Top Hes wearing ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLingo Posted July 26, 2013 #9 Share Posted July 26, 2013 I still find it amusing at the gullibility of people still believing it today.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaentum Posted July 26, 2013 #10 Share Posted July 26, 2013 (edited) Object size indicated by the reflected image: http://hunray.xp3.biz/WC.htm google map search FIGU You forgot to take into account distance from camera. The closer the camera to the object the larger the reflected images will look. Billy Meier has been shown to be a hoaxer numerous times on the internet, even here. Here is a site that evaluates the supposed UFO and shows it to be a concoction by Meier. http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/the-billy-meier-affair-wedding-cake-edition/ Edited July 26, 2013 by Quaentum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaentum Posted July 26, 2013 #11 Share Posted July 26, 2013 "Space-time Jump" Theory to Practice: http://hunray.xp3.biz/SJ-.htm Interesting photoshop jobs. I say photoshop because in several pictures, objects within the picture that should be lit by the intense light from the supposed UFO's aren't. One example is the second row, second picture. The trees and other objects have dark areas that wouldn't exist if it was a real illuminated object. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaentum Posted July 26, 2013 #12 Share Posted July 26, 2013 http://www.zamandayo...ltechnology.htm A quick check of the site you linked to showed a reference to operation high jump, the expedition to Antarctica by Admiral Byrd with of course the reference to it being an attack on a Nazi base there that failed with the loss of several aircraft. The Nazi's did not have enough transport ships to move the materials, equipment and people necessary for the construction of a base in Antarctica. One plane was lost from operation high jump due to weather conditions but there were survivors. The ships of operation high jump were split into three groups. Two were a mixture of fighting ships and the third was composed of the support ships. The support ships were sent to the far side of the continent, too far to be of any use if there was a battle. None of the groups were located anywhere near where supporters claim the Nazi base was. In essence, sites like that are taking a small amount of truth (the operation high jump was an expedition to Antarctica) to try to make the massive amounts of fiction they add seem plausible. If you take the time to research and look into the claims the vanish much like a magicians illusion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunray Posted July 26, 2013 Author #13 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Interesting photoshop jobs. I say photoshop because in several pictures, objects within the picture that should be lit by the intense light from the supposed UFO's aren't. One example is the second row, second picture. The trees and other objects have dark areas that wouldn't exist if it was a real illuminated object. 1.There is only one intersection - if you had read the text. 2.You just proved that Billy come to the future, used Photoshop, then back to 1975~1980. 3.Secrets of the Nazi-Bell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Octopus Posted July 26, 2013 #14 Share Posted July 26, 2013 This has been debunked ad nauseum. Your ridiculous statements about coming to the future and using photoshop are not helping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted July 26, 2013 #15 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Billy Meier, again, really!!?? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaentum Posted July 26, 2013 #16 Share Posted July 26, 2013 1.There is only one intersection - if you had read the text. 2.You just proved that Billy come to the future, used Photoshop, then back to 1975~1980. 3.Secrets of the Nazi-Bell [media=] [/media] 1. You missed the point that a smaller object at a closer distance will give the same results as a larger object at a farther distance and I guess you didn't go to the page I linked to showing that his wedding cake ufo was man made. 2. Since the writing on one picture says they were taken by Guido Moosbrugger it wouldn't be Billy doing anything. You also wrongly assume that the term photoshop job implicitly indicates the use of photoshop. The term these days mealy means the image has been altered. Any method whether on the computer or in the darkroom can be used and yes before computers they were creating hoax pictures. It still doesn't alter the fact that the bright light should be illuminating objects in the photos but doesn't which is a big give away to it being an altered picture. 3. Which has nothing to do with the post I made but never the less it doesn't refute the facts that despite the desire for there to be, the evidence shows there was never a Nazi base in Antarctica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunray Posted July 26, 2013 Author #17 Share Posted July 26, 2013 The reflected image(Carriage house) on metal balls had determined its size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaentum Posted July 26, 2013 #18 Share Posted July 26, 2013 The reflected image(Carriage house) on metal balls had determined its size. You can continue to ignore the evidence that shows that the supposed UFO was a human construct and you can post in huge letters but that doesn't change the facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tau Ceti Xeta Posted July 26, 2013 #19 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Object size indicated by the reflected image: http://hunray.xp3.biz/WC.htm google map search FIGU It looks like Billy Meier is a celebrity. He made it to Wikipedia! Many more photos there. Are they all fake? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Meier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Octopus Posted July 26, 2013 #20 Share Posted July 26, 2013 (edited) Of course all his pictures are fake. How desperate do you have to be to try and sell the folks at UM Billy Meier? C'mon guys, try a little harder. Edited July 26, 2013 by phantasia 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunray Posted July 28, 2013 Author #21 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowSot Posted July 28, 2013 #22 Share Posted July 28, 2013 (edited) Interesting photoshop jobs. I say photoshop because in several pictures, objects within the picture that should be lit by the intense light from the supposed UFO's aren't. One example is the second row, second picture. The trees and other objects have dark areas that wouldn't exist if it was a real illuminated object. Nah, it's simply long exposure. The other ones are fireworks. Edited July 28, 2013 by ShadowSot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted July 29, 2013 #23 Share Posted July 29, 2013 (edited) Some kook in the Spirituality vs Skepticism forum claimed when Billy Meier went to get the genuine UFO photos developed they were replaced with fake ones and Billy Meier didn't notice it.. http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=242685&st=15#entry4688314 Edited July 29, 2013 by Rlyeh 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S2F Posted July 29, 2013 #24 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Some kook in the Spirituality vs Skepticism forum claimed when Billy Meier went to get the genuine UFO photos developed they were replaced with fake ones and Billy Meier didn't notice it.. http://www.unexplain...15#entry4688314 It's never worth it to delude one's self (or worse, others) just to cling to a belief. I thought I had seen some pretty crazy theories but the ETH crowd still manages to surprise me on occasion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman Posted July 29, 2013 #25 Share Posted July 29, 2013 I remember seeing one of Meier's shills on a KTVU Channel 2 morning show back in the 80s. I forget the guy's name but it was obvious that Meier was a fake even then. It's kinda sad that people want to believe so badly, they believe Meier is really in contact with aliens when it's such obvious BS. Hitman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now