david icke is right Posted September 1, 2013 #1 Share Posted September 1, 2013 http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/britain-sold-nerve-gas-chemicals-2242520 Revealed: Britain sold nerve gas chemicals to Syria 10 months after war began 1 Sep 2013 07:21 FURIOUS politicians have demanded Prime Minister David Cameron explain why chemical export licences were granted to firms last January – 10 months after the Syrian uprising began. BRITAIN allowed firms to sell chemicals to Syria capable of being used to make nerve gas, the Sunday Mail can reveal today. Export licences for potassium fluoride and sodium fluoride were granted months after the bloody civil war in the Middle East began. The chemical is capable of being used to make weapons such as sarin, thought to be the nerve gas used in the attack on a rebel-held Damascus suburb which killed nearly 1500 people, including 426 children, 10 days ago. The hypocrisy. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A rather obscure Bassoon Posted September 1, 2013 #2 Share Posted September 1, 2013 No surprises there then. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight Of Shadows Posted September 1, 2013 #3 Share Posted September 1, 2013 good thing this posted in " Conspircies " Forums people are willing to go to that extend just so they won't admit that there is a governemet used chemcial on their civilians who been in Revolution against this government for 3 years nearly and have brought this governement to it's knees while they are on the road to freedom ? Minister of Foreign Affairs of Syrian Government : what we did in Gouta was anticipation strike because the terrorists " rebels " were going to do full-scale attack to take over damascus .. and strangely enough after the attack the government attacked those areas with all sort of missiles the Government tried to invade the areas that chemical was used on ..with failure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted September 1, 2013 #4 Share Posted September 1, 2013 If the truth could be known, I would not be a bit surprised if it turns out that the US & UK supported 'rebels' were the ones who launched the gas attacks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted September 1, 2013 #5 Share Posted September 1, 2013 There are also many more mundane uses for the two chemicals - making toothpaste and etching glass come to mind. Perhaps they also needed to fluoridate their water supply? Considering that one can make chemical weapons following a stroll down the aisle at Home Depot, I don't really see the big deal here. I think we can all agree that the article is a bit sensationalized and makes it seem like these chemicals were sent to Syria for the sole purpose of making chemical weapons. The chemicals weren't even banned at the time they were sold. So other than providing fodder for opposition politicians, what's the purpose? And just so I can note it accurately, the "mainstream media" is being considered a good source in this case? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrooma Posted September 1, 2013 #6 Share Posted September 1, 2013 There are also many more mundane uses for the two chemicals - making toothpaste and etching glass come to mind. Perhaps they also needed to fluoridate their water supply? Considering that one can make chemical weapons following a stroll down the aisle at Home Depot, I don't really see the big deal here. . was going to point out the same thing RM. but don't be too hard on DIiR- he DID get an F in science..... . I think we can all agree that the article is a bit sensationalized and makes it seem like these chemicals were sent to Syria for the sole purpose of making chemical weapons. The chemicals weren't even banned at the time they were sold. . this is nothing BUT sensationalism. and the CTs will be shouting ''b**tards!!'' from the rooftops at this 'evidence', instead of understanding that shop-bought chemicals aren't proof of one Govt.s complicity in another Govt. murdering its citizens..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted September 2, 2013 #7 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Wow, chemical export license needed for toothpaste! What were those Brits thinking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted September 2, 2013 #8 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Wow, chemical export license needed for toothpaste! What were those Brits thinking? A chemical is just that, a chemical. It has no ill intent. It can be used for a multitude of different things. If you know what you're doing, you can make a pretty nasty chemical weapon with items from under someone's kitchen sink. And, note, the export licenses were granted. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now