Still Waters Posted October 13, 2013 #1 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Wherever there are fossils, whether in books or our national parks or displayed in museums, we are constantly reminded of the geologic timescales required to preserve them. Methods such as carbon dating and stratigraphic layers also seem to bear witness to the slow and steady processes and deep time involved. Yet, despite all of the assurances by the experts that fossilization is a sedate, molecule-by-molecule transformation of dead flora and fauna over eons of time, interested bystanders, amateurs, hobbyists, children, and other more intuitive observers cannot help but notice the examples of living creatures caught in stone as they hatched, gave birth, devoured other creatures, or twisted and contorted in a moment of back-arching agony. http://www.thunderbo...d-thundercrabs/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted October 13, 2013 #2 Share Posted October 13, 2013 could stalactite growing be a rapid process? Right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted October 13, 2013 #3 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Well that'll give the Young Earth Cretinists more ammunition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacecowboy342 Posted October 14, 2013 #4 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Wherever there are fossils, whether in books or our national parks or displayed in museums, we are constantly reminded of the geologic timescales required to preserve them. Methods such as carbon dating and stratigraphic layers also seem to bear witness to the slow and steady processes and deep time involved. Yet, despite all of the assurances by the experts that fossilization is a sedate, molecule-by-molecule transformation of dead flora and fauna over eons of time, interested bystanders, amateurs, hobbyists, children, and other more intuitive observers cannot help but notice the examples of living creatures caught in stone as they hatched, gave birth, devoured other creatures, or twisted and contorted in a moment of back-arching agony. http://www.thunderbo...d-thundercrabs/ That link seems to postulate that carbon could somehow change to silicon from electrical discharge. I'm not a physicist but I can't imagine how this could be possible. Carbon-12, the most common form has 6 protons 6 neutrons and 6 electrons. Silicon has 14 protons 14 neutrons and 14 electrons so the only way to change carbon into silicon would require some form of nuclear fusion. I read something about accomplishing this using lasers. Electrical discharge is just about the flow of electrons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted October 14, 2013 #5 Share Posted October 14, 2013 That link seems to postulate that carbon could somehow change to silicon from electrical discharge. I'm not a physicist but I can't imagine how this could be possible. Carbon-12, the most common form has 6 protons 6 neutrons and 6 electrons. Silicon has 14 protons 14 neutrons and 14 electrons so the only way to change carbon into silicon would require some form of nuclear fusion. I read something about accomplishing this using lasers. Electrical discharge is just about the flow of electrons. On the home page the site is promoting the electric universe hypothesis. Apparently a lot of crazy stuff is possible in the electric universe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now