toast Posted January 24, 2014 #126 Share Posted January 24, 2014 You are missing the point: the rover has not moved in weeks now. The composition of the rock is unlike any other. So once again. The rover has not moved.... Not moved, it was in a stationary position. Has not moved......not moved.... Not moved... Can we stop now saying that it was one of the wheels? The rover has not moved in weeks...not move...everyone please repeat; not move...ok? "The rover, which landed on Mars in 2004, hasn't moved in over a month as it waits for better weather on the red planet.Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz2rI99NkWa " Again, the DM published BS. Check post #80. And, mantras should be kept secret ("not moved", yours?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted January 24, 2014 #127 Share Posted January 24, 2014 nice, this is the first thread in weeks that gave me the actual feeling of getting properly informed about stuff, not drowned in speculative bickering! thx I`m quite sure that the "stone-softening-theory" will join the discussion later on to explain that the object separation was resulted by this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted January 24, 2014 #128 Share Posted January 24, 2014 I`m quite sure that the "stone-softening-theory" will join the discussion later on to explain that the object separation was resulted by this. what the stone-softening fudge is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted January 24, 2014 #129 Share Posted January 24, 2014 what the stone-softening fudge is that? PP thread. Zoser claimed that the PP stones were taken into the accurate shapes by a softening process. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted January 24, 2014 #130 Share Posted January 24, 2014 i see..... i made a big bow about the AA-threads so far, stuff like that being the main reason but who knows....where would the german proverb "Weinen zum Steinerweichen" ("crying so bad that the stones soften up") come from? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted January 24, 2014 #131 Share Posted January 24, 2014 PP thread. Zoser claimed that the PP stones were taken into the accurate shapes by a softening process. when youve watched every episode of the AA, everything by Chris Dunn on nuclear powered pyramids..then every vid by Brien Foerester on PP - (600 odd he says he watched!)... you then experience the brain softening process that comes about by BS overload. So much so that it becomes totally rational (for some) to indeed believe rocks can be melted And its true, because its found on many vids on youtube 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted January 24, 2014 #132 Share Posted January 24, 2014 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted January 24, 2014 #133 Share Posted January 24, 2014 when youve watched every episode of the AA, everything by Chris Dunn on nuclear powered pyramids..then every vid by Brien Foerester on PP - (600 odd he says he watched!)... you then experience the brain softening process that comes about by BS overload. So much so that it becomes totally rational (for some) to indeed believe rocks can be melted And its true, because its found on many vids on youtube of course, rock can be melted! but i doubt the result of that makes a nice temple 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountain_softball Posted January 25, 2014 #134 Share Posted January 25, 2014 underneath the ground had something to do with it, the weather or when heavy material rides over it could brought it out from the ground as the rover was near by. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted January 26, 2014 #135 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Sounds like the RH front wheel is locked up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sakari Posted January 26, 2014 #136 Share Posted January 26, 2014 He did it........... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrLzs Posted January 26, 2014 #137 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Wait a minute - look at the shadow angles!! That's fake - probably taken in a studio on earth. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted January 28, 2014 #138 Share Posted January 28, 2014 You know the more NASA Looks at it and the more everyone Looks at it ! THe Better the Odds of a Better reason to Send Men& Women to Mars ! We would Really Get into the Digging part of the Exploration ! I Love that we get little hints like this ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibeliever Posted January 28, 2014 #139 Share Posted January 28, 2014 You know the more NASA Looks at it and the more everyone Looks at it ! THe Better the Odds of a Better reason to Send Men& Women to Mars ! We would Really Get into the Digging part of the Exploration ! I Love that we get little hints like this ! I'd certainly like to see at least more sophisticated rovers continue to explore there. It cracked me up a little that when we flipped over a rock everyone was all excited because we were seeeing something we normally wouldn't get to see! Maybe next time we send up something that can turn over a rock now and then lol. I'm not putting down the rover or it's designers at all. An amazing feat to do what they've done, but we are growing leaps and bounds right now with robotics. Let's get something up there that can cover some distance and has a little more flexibility. For me I can't see humans on Mars any time soon. We lack the will right now to take on something that grand. There's no profit in it. If we were able to shorten the travel time to a couple of weeks that might change rapidly, but for now I can't see humans investing in it. Which makes me a little sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted January 28, 2014 #140 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Purty sure we have the ability to Flip over rocks ! Afterall Its NASA ! They can land a Ton on Mars ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibeliever Posted January 28, 2014 #141 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Purty sure we have the ability to Flip over rocks ! Afterall Its NASA ! They can land a Ton on Mars ! No doubt lol. Back in the 90's we used to have a running joke: NASA. Successfully crashing into Mars for decades now For what we have up there now it's remarkable. Pathfinder was designed in the 80's and flown in the 90's. Design for Spirit and Opportunity began back in the late 80's. Just thinking how far we've come in the last decade it's exciting to think of what we'll be able to fly in the next 10 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now