Chris_com28 Posted October 30, 2004 #1 Share Posted October 30, 2004 http://www.guardian.co.uk/netnotes/article...,794425,00.html Apparently Kerry and Bush are also cousins and related to Count Dracula. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffybunny Posted October 30, 2004 #2 Share Posted October 30, 2004 Apparently Kerry and Bush are also cousins and related to Count Dracula. 331968[/snapback] I would be willing to believe that, seeing as how they both suck... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtemperate Posted October 31, 2004 #3 Share Posted October 31, 2004 Fluffy thats unfair.... I would have said that is impossible as one is a figment of an imagination, whilst the other two we wish were.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_com28 Posted October 31, 2004 Author #4 Share Posted October 31, 2004 Well I read it on a site that investigates genetics and family trees. I'm pretty sure they ment someone like Vlad The Impailer and not someone that actually drinks blood to stay alive and can turn into a bat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Independent1 Posted October 31, 2004 #5 Share Posted October 31, 2004 Well I read it on a site that investigates genetics and family trees. I'm pretty sure they ment someone like Vlad The Impailer and not someone that actually drinks blood to stay alive and can turn into a bat. 332195[/snapback] I couldn't pull up the link However, we are all related, if you go back far enough. In fact, I might be your 34th cousin, 9 times removed. BTW, what the heck does the removed thing mean anyway? I understant thay my cousin and I share one set of grandparents, my 2nd cousin and I share one set of great grandparents, etc..., but what does the removed thing mean? Does anyone know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunarmdscissor Posted October 31, 2004 #6 Share Posted October 31, 2004 Independnt its an american thing, we dont use that expression. only really use the "2nd cousin thing", thats about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_com28 Posted October 31, 2004 Author #7 Share Posted October 31, 2004 However, we are all related, if you go back far enough. In fact, I might be your 34th cousin, 9 times removed. Maybe. I read that you could predict who becomes elected next by how "royal" their blood is. The one who has the most genetic connections will apparently be elected President. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Independent1 Posted November 1, 2004 #8 Share Posted November 1, 2004 However, we are all related, if you go back far enough. In fact, I might be your 34th cousin, 9 times removed. Maybe. I read that you could predict who becomes elected next by how "royal" their blood is. The one who has the most genetic connections will apparently be elected President. 332989[/snapback] I read on these forums that it is the one with the shotest name. I also read that names that end in a sound like "un" win 80% of the time (ie.. Jefferson, Washington, Madison, Clinton, Reagan, Lincoln, Nixon, Johnson, etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talon Posted November 14, 2004 #9 Share Posted November 14, 2004 Prince William ... just so everyone knows, the monarchy sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talon Posted November 14, 2004 #10 Share Posted November 14, 2004 Doe this mean the Royals can all get lost over to the White House and just... not come back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now