Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Bizarre rotating object pictured over London

seeder

By seeder
in Extraterrestrial Life and The UFO Phenomenon

 Share

Recommended Posts

seeder Celestial

seeder

Posted
  • Author
   #26 
Posted

Erm the Portugal object is not transparent,...........

quote from me on the other thread this was discussed:

"Funny how the people thought it was a balloon isnt it? But then decided to go with the ufo story for the one minute of fame".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • zoser

    37

  • scowl

    17

  • seeder

    17

  • JesseCuster

    13

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Merc14
Merc14

I think zoser should be barred from putting "DYOR" in his posts from here on out since he obviously does none himself.

DieChecker
DieChecker

Zoser, You don't see any similarity between.... and.... Here is what I see....

JesseCuster
JesseCuster

Oh, that's going in the old mental database for future reference. Any sources consisting of text are troublesome because anyone can write text. You couldn't make this **** up.

Posted Images

scowl Illuminated

scowl

Posted
   #27 
Posted

If you can make the comparison stick then have a go.

Just did. Where were you?

You have not succeeded as yet. One image is see though the other not.

Did you not read the definition of a silhouette?

Over to you. The Portugal object was never described as as transparent by the way,

Nor was the NASA balloon. Can you see through it in the photo seeder supplied?

Object in front of lighter backgrounds makes things look dark? Did you not understand that?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zoser Sagacious

zoser

Posted
   #28 
Posted

quote from me on the other thread this was discussed:

"Funny how the people thought it was a balloon isnt it? But then decided to go with the ufo story for the one minute of fame".

Weather balloon idea examined my meteorologist. Hypothesis rejected.

See 9:45

Sorry but another fail.

Please DYOR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zoser Sagacious

zoser

Posted
   #29 
Posted

Just did. Where were you?

Did you not read the definition of a silhouette?

Nor was the NASA balloon. Can you see through it in the photo seeder supplied?

Object in front of lighter backgrounds makes things look dark? Did you not understand that?

Fail Scowl.

See above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JesseCuster Illuminated

JesseCuster

Posted
   #30 
Posted

If you can make the comparison stick then have a go.

You have not succeeded as yet. One image is see though the other not.

Over to you. The Portugal object was never described as as transparent by the way,

The single example of a scientific research balloon shown to you that was of a very similar shape and form was made of a transparent material therefore the Portuguese UFO couldn't have been the same thing? All balloons are made of the same material?

Are you seriously making this argument?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
seeder Celestial

seeder

Posted
  • Author
   #31 
Posted

Please DYOR.

When will you stop relying on the BS ufo vids as your only sources? Who simply embellish ufo stories with re-enactments to make it more exciting fodder for the sheeple who watch stuff like that? Come back with a text based source from a credible author(s) and you may get taken (a little) more seriously

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zoser Sagacious

zoser

Posted
   #32 
Posted

The single example of a scientific research balloon shown to you that was of a very similar shape and form was made of a transparent material therefore the Portuguese UFO couldn't have been the same thing? All balloons are made of the same material?

Are you seriously making this argument?

See video. Hypothesis rejected. See for yourself.

When will you stop relying on the BS ufo vids as your only sources? Who simply embellish ufo stories with re-enactments to make it more exciting fodder for the sheeple who watch stuff like that? Come back with a text based source from a credible author(s) and you may get taken (a little) more seriously

Another banal BS explanation hits the rocks.

A bit like the fallen lighthouse.

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ExoPaul Novice

ExoPaul

Posted
   #33 
Posted

It looks to me a little bit like an expensive remote control helicopter or maybe a drone helicopter that the military and law enforcement agencies are testing. The reason you can't see the rotor on top or the tail rotor is probably due to the motion blur from the camera. If you ignore the rotor blades (top and tail) then you're left with a typical remote control helicopter shape.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
scowl Illuminated

scowl

Posted
   #34 
Posted

Fail Scowl.

See above.

Fail Zoser. You don't write anything because you looked at the photo of the NASA balloon and realized it was translucent and would create a silhouette exactly as shown in the other photo, therefore your silly argument that it should be invisible was crushed.

But you won't learn. You'll do the same thing next week.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zoser Sagacious

zoser

Posted
   #35 
Posted

Fail Zoser. You don't write anything because you looked at the photo of the NASA balloon and realized it was translucent and would create a silhouette exactly as shown in the other photo, therefore your silly argument that it should be invisible was crushed.

But you won't learn. You'll do the same thing next week.

Proof of NASA balloon? The meterologist disagrees by the way.

Go ahead............

Link to comment
Share on other sites
paperdyer Illuminated

paperdyer

Posted
   #36 
Posted

Well, to chime in here, the weather balloons have their points at the bottom. This object has its point at the top. Yes the photo can bbe inverted, then you'd have the "legs" sticking staight up. The new object does appear similar to the to the Portugal one in concept, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seeder Celestial

seeder

Posted
  • Author
   #37 
Posted

Proof of NASA balloon? The meterologist disagrees by the way.

Go ahead............

as said already

When will you stop relying on the BS ufo vids as your only sources? Who simply embellish ufo stories with re-enactments to make it more exciting fodder for the sheeple who watch stuff like that?

Come back with a text based source from a credible author(s) and you may get taken (a little) more seriously :tu:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mikenator Novice

Mikenator

Posted
   #38 
Posted

photos don't mean nothing I edit photos and add objects to the pictures all the time on my android phone to trick my little brother he thinks gnomes are real so my other brother and me play jokes on him alot by adding fake gnomes from online that we find to the pictures we take of our yard anybody can do it with an Android phone

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zoser Sagacious

zoser

Posted
   #39 
Posted

as said already

When will you stop relying on the BS ufo vids as your only sources? Who simply embellish ufo stories with re-enactments to make it more exciting fodder for the sheeple who watch stuff like that?

Come back with a text based source from a credible author(s) and you may get taken (a little) more seriously

Please refrain from posting expert opinions and witness testimony when it contradicts our hurriedly put together half baked explanations

Well we need to get to the truth do we not. The answer to your dilemma is to listen more to what the experts say and avoid being fixed in your preconceived sense of denial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zoser Sagacious

zoser

Posted
   #41 
Posted

Zoser loses, then switches the subject...

Stick to the point. If you can prove it's a balloon please do so.

Any explanation has to match the witness testimony. You have the video. Give it a go..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seeder Celestial

seeder

Posted
  • Author
   #42 
Posted

Stick to the point. If you can prove it's a balloon please do so.

Any explanation has to match the witness testimony. You have the video. Give it a go..........

wrong again, youre making the claim. so no-one has to prove anything except you. If one image, as presented, bears a remarkable similarity, then it must be the most obvious answer. You know, If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck....then it must be a?

I have asked for you for text based reports from credible authors and have received none. So erm, YOU FAILED! But then again thats not even surprising anymore. All you ever do is post vids and tell people to watch them. WHY? Do you think this place is full of people who lap those vids up? I think your incapable of text based discussions due to your inability to concentrate on actually reading stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zoser Sagacious

zoser

Posted
   #43 
Posted

wrong again, youre making the claim. so no-one has to prove anything except you. If one image, as presented, bears a remarkable similarity, then it must be the most obvious answer. You know, If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck....then it must be a?

You posted an image of a balloon, making an implicit statement that the Portugal object was a balloon. Can you prove that? Does is square with either the witness testimony or the meteorologist's opinion?

You have the clip; report back.

I have asked for you for text based reports from credible authors and have received none. So erm, YOU FAILED! But then again thats not even surprising anymore. All you ever do is post vids and tell people to watch them. WHY? Do you think this place is full of people who lap those vids up? I think your incapable of text based discussions due to your inability to concentrate on actually reading stuff

Better to hear it from people direct I would have thought. if you want text try google for it. Trouble with text is it can be written by any old wag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sweetpumper Erudite

Sweetpumper

Posted
   #44 
Posted

photos don't mean nothing I edit photos and add objects to the pictures all the time on my android phone to trick my little brother he thinks gnomes are real so my other brother and me play jokes on him alot by adding fake gnomes from online that we find to the pictures we take of our yard anybody can do it with an Android phone

You're doing a disservice to those serious about Gnomology.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S2F Enlightened

S2F

Posted
   #45 
Posted (edited)

Bizarre 'rotating' object pictured over London

This bizarre object was spotted over London today - prompting some to speculate it could be a UFO.

The strange sighting was seen at around 1.30pm in north London. It was pictured by a member of the public who posted it on Facebook under the name Mixtris UFO-images.

Writing on the social networking site, the user wrote: "I captured this object a couple of streets away from where I live. "The object appeared black in colour and was rotating as it moved along.

"I captured nearly 5 minutes of video before I lost sight of it floating in the direction of Highbury & Islington. I'm not sure what this object is. I thought it was a balloon, but there appears to be a light on it."

More images

http://www.mirror.co...4#ixzz30NtvfBv9

alternative link

http://www.news.com....v-1226899564819

563455-ef56692c-cf29-11e3-ae84-eacdfc097015.jpg

Scruffy looking UFO imo...do click the Mirror link for more images. So what is it? RC toy with stuff attached? Trash blown up?

It's a baby Imperial Scout Drone...

Arakyd_Viper.jpg

We should get a rather unpleasant visit from the Empire shortly. Anybody know where I can get a lightsaber on the cheap?

:P

Edited by Slave2Fate
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DieChecker Celestial

+DieChecker

Posted
   #46 
Posted

I think it does have many points of similarity to the shark balloons that people are talking about online with reference to this UFO.

airswimmer-shark-jonathan-ross.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Junior Chubb Enlightened

Junior Chubb

Posted
   #49 
Posted (edited)

It's a baby Imperial Scout Drone...

*image*

We should get a rather unpleasant visit from the Empire shortly. Anybody know where I can get a lightsaber on the cheap?

:P

Good call, I was thinking more 'Batteries Not Included'. ;)

02_zpsd420f6cf.jpg

Edited by Junior Chubb
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DieChecker Celestial

+DieChecker

Posted
   #50 
Posted

Good call, I was thinking more 'Batteries Not Included'. ;)

02_zpsd420f6cf.jpg

I once saw someone trying to pawn off a still from Batteries Not Included as an real life UFO. Luckily many people saw the fraud right off.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.