bubblykiss Posted July 29, 2014 #1 Share Posted July 29, 2014 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/25/gwen-stefani-breastfeeding-photo-_n_5621839.html?hpt=hp_bn17 She's a rock star -- and a proud mom, too. Gwen Stefani posted the below photo to Instagram on Friday, showing her with her 5-month-old baby boy, Apollo Bowie Flynn. In the snapshot, the 44-year-old appears to be breastfeeding her son beside a gorgeous, mountainous landscape in Switzerland. Apollo can be seen wrapped in a white and red-starred swaddling blanket by aden + anais. The company just teamed up with AIDS charity (RED) and a portion of the proceeds from sales of the blanket pictured in Stefani's pic (and other products) will go to fight AIDS, notes People. **************** Anyone else look at that photo and think it was took in 1976? I mean the washout color and ancient fashions....just screams 1970s. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quiXilver Posted July 29, 2014 #2 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Pure Awesome! Imagine: using breasts for their intended purpose... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amaterasu Posted July 29, 2014 #3 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Great pic and good for her for promoting breastfeeding ...if that was the intention! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefenceMinisterMishkin Posted July 29, 2014 #4 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Meh.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quiXilver Posted July 29, 2014 #5 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Moo? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted July 29, 2014 #6 Share Posted July 29, 2014 (edited) Did you post this because breasts are an unexplained mystery to you? Edited July 29, 2014 by OverSword 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redefining Success Posted July 29, 2014 #7 Share Posted July 29, 2014 damn, too far away for a side boob. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quiXilver Posted July 29, 2014 #8 Share Posted July 29, 2014 that cow pic is hysterical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabby Kitten Posted July 30, 2014 #9 Share Posted July 30, 2014 It's a nice photo although sadly not every new mum would agree with this. Some have difficulty breastfeeding as I did, yes there are problems, and other mums find it painful. They wouldn't feel like smiling happily as the celebrity mum in the photo. Just wondering, hm what's this doing in "weird news" section? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquatus1 Posted July 30, 2014 #10 Share Posted July 30, 2014 The only reason I can guess that people would claim she is breast-feeding is because there is no one around her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatFromHell Posted July 30, 2014 #11 Share Posted July 30, 2014 "Breastfeeding, Fun for the whole family", Er, What??? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: Posted July 30, 2014 #12 Share Posted July 30, 2014 It's a nice photo although sadly not every new mum would agree with this. Some have difficulty breastfeeding as I did, yes there are problems, and other mums find it painful. They wouldn't feel like smiling happily as the celebrity mum in the photo. Just wondering, hm what's this doing in "weird news" section? My wife tried breastfeeding for two days with our son and it was too hurtful for her. She was disappointed for a little while. I was also asking myself the same question. The only thing weird about breasts is how I become like a kid at a candy store (my wife's are very nice). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaniac Posted July 30, 2014 #13 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Breastfeeding is meant to be done in private. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quiXilver Posted July 30, 2014 #14 Share Posted July 30, 2014 says who? don't you eat in public? what on earth is wrong with a breast? can't handle it? so laughing at you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ealdwita Posted July 30, 2014 #15 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Apollo Bowie Flynn? poor li'l bugger! I hope he's learned how to fight by the time he goes to school! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaniac Posted July 30, 2014 #16 Share Posted July 30, 2014 (edited) says who? Every person with moral decency and common sense. Don't you eat in public? Do you suck your mother's teet in public? What on earth is wrong with a breast? Breasts are wonderful, but they don't belong in everyone's faces, let's admit. can't handle it?so laughing at you It's called decency. How would you feel if your wife, or mother, or daughter did it infront of the public? Edited July 30, 2014 by Insaniac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quiXilver Posted July 30, 2014 #17 Share Posted July 30, 2014 there is nothing indecent about a breast nor a baby eating this issue is entirely in your head and your brainwashed idea of what is right no more right than the men of papua new guinnea, who when unable to hunt properly will do the 'decent' thing for their tribe and go out and use a reed to cause internal bleeding to their genitals... because they need to get the 'bad blood' out and thus purify themselves for the hunt what is normal to you is normal to you only because someone told you to non critical thinkers = robots programmed by mommy's books and culture's demands. zombie man for the loss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redefining Success Posted July 30, 2014 #18 Share Posted July 30, 2014 (edited) Every person with moral decency and common sense. Do you suck your mother's teet in public? Breasts are wonderful, but they don't belong in everyone's faces, let's admit. It's called decency. How would you feel if your wife, or mother, or daughter did it infront of the public? People with moral decency and common sense will realise its the most natural act a mother can do, perfectly innocent and very legal in the UK, my missus whips em out in the library, tesco or even the car boot sale. I wouldnt suck my mothers teet in public for 2 reasons, 1, im 33 and no longer a baby/infant, 2, bad back. Breasts are superb, dirty love pillows, but they dont belong in everyones face, just the babies, but take a drive round any town and see how many are on show for every reason other than feeding a CHILD. My missus does get the jumper udders out in public, to feed our 14 week old, I enjoy tutting at any one who stares for more than 3 seconds. I think you may be under the impression that breast feeding women literally have there boobs FULLY exposed and a child dangling. 99% cover them selves and baby once the child latches on. Its opinions against breast feeding that makes it difficult for new mothers to feed a child the way that god / evolution intended. Alot of difficulty in breast feeding is anxiety caused by narrow minded people who are dead against it. I say whip em out girls and do what you can as nature intended. Edited July 30, 2014 by Redefining Success 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rashore Posted July 30, 2014 #19 Share Posted July 30, 2014 I'm not comfortable with this pic. Not because of the general subject of breast feeding in public. Because hey, babies get hungry in public, it happens, get over it. I wouldn't care if this was at a public beach or something like that. It's the fact that she took a private moment pic, and shared it with the general public. To me, it smacks of publicity rather than anything else. Especially because the blanket the kid is wrapped in is for a sales campaign, even if it's a charitable one. Using your kids for publicity is not cool IMO. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabby Kitten Posted July 30, 2014 #20 Share Posted July 30, 2014 People with moral decency and common sense will realise its the most natural act a mother can do, perfectly innocent and very legal in the UK, my missus whips em out in the library, tesco or even the car boot sale. I wouldnt suck my mothers teet in public for 2 reasons, 1, im 33 and no longer a baby/infant, 2, bad back. Breasts are superb, dirty love pillows, but they dont belong in everyones face, just the babies, but take a drive round any town and see how many are on show for every reason other than feeding a CHILD. My missus does get the jumper udders out in public, to feed our 14 week old, I enjoy tutting at any one who stares for more than 3 seconds. I think you may be under the impression that breast feeding women literally have there boobs FULLY exposed and a child dangling. 99% cover them selves and baby once the child latches on. Its opinions against breast feeding that makes it difficult for new mothers to feed a child the way that god / evolution intended. Alot of difficulty in breast feeding is anxiety caused by narrow minded people who are dead against it. I say whip em out girls and do what you can as nature intended. If I was able to breastfeed I wouldn't of done it in public. You advocating that new mums get their tits out because it was "what nature intended" really translates as you wanting to have a look. You make breastfeeding sound dirty. No wonder so many women feel self consious and anxiety about it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sakari Posted July 30, 2014 #21 Share Posted July 30, 2014 I was expecting more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldorado Posted July 30, 2014 #22 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Next time i see Gwen am gonna try my best to look like am dying of hunger. Hope she doesn't give me money. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaniac Posted July 31, 2014 #23 Share Posted July 31, 2014 People with moral decency and common sense will realise its the most natural act a mother can do. Nah. People with moral decency and common sense would humbly inform the woman to breastfeed in privacy, as it is not only an example of partial nudity but more importantly, an intimate moment between mother and child. Perfectly innocent and very legal in the UK. Just because imperfect Man decides something is legal doesn't necessarily make it morally right or true. And partial nudity really isn't all that innocent when you think about it. We wear clothes for a reason. My missus whips em out in the library, tesco or even the car boot sale. lmao Next it'll be in the street or at the park. No offence. Breasts are superb, dirty love pillows, but they dont belong in everyones face, just the babies, but take a drive round any town and see how many are on show for every reason other than feeding a CHILD. I travel to Tesco once every two or three weeks, go on up to the local store once every two days and travel to Town every couple of months, and don't recall once seeing a woman breastfeeding in public. What part of the UK do you live in? My missus does does get the jumper udders out in public, to feed our 14 week old, I enjoy tutting at any one who stares for more than 3 seconds. You should tell them to mind their own business, or better yet, ask your wife to find some place private to breastfeed. I think you may be under the impression that breast feeding women literally have there boobs FULLY exposed and a child dangling. 99% cover them selves and baby once the child latches on. Nope. It's partial nudity, but nudity is nudity and I don't believe it belongs in public. Keep it to yourself. Its opinions against breast feeding that makes it difficult for new mothers to feed a child the way that god / evolution intended. God on nudity: 1st Corinthians 12:23 - "And on those parts of the body that we think less honorable we bestow the greater honor, and our unpresentable parts are treated with greater modesty". I believe God lovingly, and humbly disagrees. I don't believe in Atheistic evolution. Sorry. Alot of difficulty in breast feeding is anxiety caused by narrow minded people who are dead against it. Is this true? I'm not against it, I just believe it should be done in private for the two reasons explained in my first point of this post. Whip em out girls and do what you can as nature intended. Sounds perverted and morally degrading to me. Take care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oniomancer Posted July 31, 2014 #24 Share Posted July 31, 2014 Ah. You meant "Awww, sweet..." not "Dude! Sweet!" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oniomancer Posted July 31, 2014 #25 Share Posted July 31, 2014 Apollo Bowie Flynn? poor li'l bugger! I hope he's learned how to fight by the time he goes to school! Tell that to his brother, Zuma Nesta Rock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now