Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Fungi- ancient bulbs?


Ichihara

Recommended Posts

The Turtle (also called the American Turtle) was the world's first submersible with a documented record of use in combat. It was built in Old Saybrook, Connecticut in 1775 by American Patriot David Bushnell as a means of attaching explosive charges to ships in a harbor.

Six small pieces of thick glass in the top of the submarine provided natural light.[5] Illumination while submerged was provided by a piece of cork that gave off a fungus-powered bioluminescent foxfire. During trials in November 1775, Bushnell discovered that this illumination failed when the temperature dropped too low.

http://en.wikipedia....le_(submersible)

Foxfire, also sometimes called "fairy fire", is the bioluminescence created by some species of fungi present in decaying wood. The bluish-green glow is attributed to luciferase, an oxidative enzyme, which emits light as it reacts with luciferin.

The oldest recorded documentation of foxfire is from 382 B.C., by Aristotle, whose notes refer to a light that, unlike fire, was cold to the touch. The Roman thinker Pliny the Elder also mentioned glowing wood in olive groves.[3]

At the suggestion of Benjamin Franklin, foxfire was used for light on the Turtle, an early submarine.[4]

http://en.wikipedia....bioluminescence)

could it be that ancients used them as illumination?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah you would think that somebody else before Aristotle and Pliny the Elder would have noticed the glowing wood at some time in history wouldn't you. However, since theirs were the first known mentioning of it, apparently nobody actually used it for lighting, probably because lamps were so much brighter and convenient. I did read, though, that Egyptians would use a series of shiny metal mirrors to reflect sunlight to the interiors of structures they were decorating with inscriptions, to prevent soot from torches dirtying up the walls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bennu

what about heat? what about safely dreaming without fear of being fry? and lack of evidence for fire use in temples, tombs etc.

Edited by Ichihara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you even read by foxfire? I know it glows rather dimly, but I can't imagine it has enough light to see anything by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the suggestion of Benjamin Franklin, foxfire was used for light on the Turtle, an early submarine.

i think you could read.

Edited by Ichihara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the suggestion of Benjamin Franklin, foxfire was used for light on the Turtle, an early submarine.

i think you could read.

As it turns out, that Wikipedia entry was incorrect. I have corrected it.

Benjamin Franklin did not suggest foxfire for the Turtle. David Bushnell, the designer of the Turtle, affixed small pieces of woods with foxfire to the needles of the barometer and compass, so he could navigate in the dark. Unfortunately, the cold temperature rendered the fungi inoperative. His friend, Benjamin Gale, sent a request through another friend, asking Benjamin Franklin for suggestions for other methods of illuminating the instruments.

From what I have read regarding fungi over the last hour or so, I have found claims of fungi bright enough to read by, but I haven't found any actual examples or first-hand reports. Extremely bright fungi seem to be the 50-foot shark of the bioluminescent world; everyone knows it is out there, but no one has ever seen it.

Edited by aquatus1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it turns out, that Wikipedia entry was incorrect. I have corrected it.

Benjamin Franklin did not suggest foxfire for the Turtle. David Bushnell, the designer of the Turtle, affixed small pieces of woods with foxfire to the needles of the barometer and compass, so he could navigate in the dark. Unfortunately, the cold temperature rendered the fungi inoperative. His friend, Benjamin Gale, sent a request through another friend, asking Benjamin Franklin for suggestions for other methods of illuminating the instruments.

From what I have read regarding fungi over the last hour or so, I have found claims of fungi bright enough to read by, but I haven't found any actual examples or first-hand reports. Extremely bright fungi seem to be the 50-foot shark of the bioluminescent world; everyone knows it is out there, but no one has ever seen it.

can you give links, sources about turtle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah you would think that somebody else before Aristotle and Pliny the Elder would have noticed the glowing wood at some time in history wouldn't you. However, since theirs were the first known mentioning of it, apparently nobody actually used it for lighting, probably because lamps were so much brighter and convenient. I did read, though, that Egyptians would use a series of shiny metal mirrors to reflect sunlight to the interiors of structures they were decorating with inscriptions, to prevent soot from torches dirtying up the walls.

bennu

what about heat? what about safely dreaming without fear of being fry? and lack of evidence for fire use in temples, tombs etc.

With the mirrors they had available in ancient Egypt I don't think there is much chance of being fried. You need some kind of parabolic mirror to get enough heat for frying people. The use of a flat mirror is a perfectly feasible explanation for how they did it. I don't know if they did use this method but I don't see why they couldn't ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure. Here's a link to the correspondence. You'll find the first reference to fox fire in the first letter. Towards the bottom of the letter, you'll also see that Franklin was consulted regarding the underwater explosives Bushnell was developing, which is what probably led to the confusion.

Now, I did read an interesting article about new genetically engineered fungi being sold as a novelty product, but I still don't think they are quite at a reading level just yet.

Edited by aquatus1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the abundance of ancient lamps that have been found, the use of fungi seems unlikely.

Harte

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mirror to light interiors do seem to be another one of those things everyone assumes were real, but that don't have any actual evidence behind them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the mirrors they had available in ancient Egypt I don't think there is much chance of being fried. You need some kind of parabolic mirror to get enough heat for frying people. The use of a flat mirror is a perfectly feasible explanation for how they did it. I don't know if they did use this method but I don't see why they couldn't ?

I think Ichihara meant the lamps, rather than the mirrors. Lamps would certainly be more dangerous than fungi.

It was an interesting idea, Ichihara. Sadly no records of it exist so it will remain just an idea. It was a novel idea though. I hadn't thought of such a possibility before. These glowing fungi are not common knowledge. This is actually the first I've heard about the glowing wood fungus. I knew there were mushrooms that glow, but they would be very fragile and short lived I would think. You couldn't really keep them around for any length of time. Probably not much fungus growth in Egypt, though. Rather dry conditions. They also didn't have much wood.

Edited by Bennu
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Myth busters did an episode on the mirrors and they were fairly unsuccessful. They determined that you needed something to disperse the light rather than just focusing mirrors.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Myth busters did an episode on the mirrors and they were fairly unsuccessful. They determined that you needed something to disperse the light rather than just focusing mirrors.

Maybe they just used very clean-burning lamps instead of torches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it turns out, that Wikipedia entry was incorrect. I have corrected it.

Benjamin Franklin did not suggest foxfire for the Turtle. David Bushnell, the designer of the Turtle, affixed small pieces of woods with foxfire to the needles of the barometer and compass, so he could navigate in the dark. Unfortunately, the cold temperature rendered the fungi inoperative. His friend, Benjamin Gale, sent a request through another friend, asking Benjamin Franklin for suggestions for other methods of illuminating the instruments.

From what I have read regarding fungi over the last hour or so, I have found claims of fungi bright enough to read by, but I haven't found any actual examples or first-hand reports. Extremely bright fungi seem to be the 50-foot shark of the bioluminescent world; everyone knows it is out there, but no one has ever seen it.

Greetings Aquatus. A first hand report. Have personally encountered bioluminescent fungi on a number of occasions. Only even visible under very minimal external light conditions. While neither of the below is at all on a research level, they would be generally consistent with my personal observations. Would consider the basic concept untenable, particularly in respect to the lumen level required for reading.

http://mediaedge.imi.../vslife11/i4/p6

http://www.messageto...com/foxfire.php

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Myth busters did an episode on the mirrors and they were fairly unsuccessful. They determined that you needed something to disperse the light rather than just focusing mirrors.

The problem the Myth Busters had was that the external mirror has to track the Sun, otherwise the light is only good for a couple minutes. Surely the ancients didn't have Sun tracking equipment like we use today on photo voltaic collection devices.

Perhaps something like a slow leaking bag of sand, linked to a spring could be used to gradually turn the mirror, but it would require a fairly complex set up.

Edited by DieChecker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah you would think that somebody else before Aristotle and Pliny the Elder would have noticed the glowing wood at some time in history wouldn't you. However, since theirs were the first known mentioning of it, apparently nobody actually used it for lighting, probably because lamps were so much brighter and convenient. I did read, though, that Egyptians would use a series of shiny metal mirrors to reflect sunlight to the interiors of structures they were decorating with inscriptions, to prevent soot from torches dirtying up the walls.

Another way they avoided the soot was to cover the roof and sides of the areas being worked on either with mud or textiles, this would trap what little soot there was and would be removed or taken away after they were finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings Aquatus. A first hand report. Have personally encountered bioluminescent fungi on a number of occasions. Only even visible under very minimal external light conditions.

That's been my experience as well. You can't even see the stuff unless it's actually pitch-black.

There was a reasonably well-received book called "Foxfire" by some guy who ran some kind of scouting group (it wasn't the BSA.) Turned out to be a molester, but he'd been on all the talk shows already.

Harte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ancient may have had another source and that is from what was later called Bologna stones, it was rediscovered a few hundred years ago but may have been known to earlier cultures also - but that is speculation.

http://www.schweizer...escent_material

In 1603, the Italian shoemaker Vincenzo Cascariolo found that a stone (baryte) from the outskirts of Bologna emitted light in the dark without any external excitation source
Edited by Hanslune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a link to an interesting article about the history of the use of cold light or luminescence.http://www.squireswatches.com/Question%20in%20Time/Questions%20in%20Time%20Question%20No.%2010.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ancient may have had another source and that is from what was later called Bologna stones, it was rediscovered a few hundred years ago but may have been known to earlier cultures also - but that is speculation.

http://www.schweizer...escent_material

Italian guy, eh?

Sorry, they turned the Bologna stones into Mortadella Till. Delicious as an antipasto.

Harte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, if you really want reflected natural light inside your buildings, here's a little something I saw on TV ages and ages ago, when I was just a baby moderator, and this thread inspired me to look it up only to find it is alive and well.

Himawari is a light collection system that catches sunlight, filters out damaging UV and Infra wavelengths, and then literally pipes the remaining natural sunlight to wherever you need it view optical fibers.

Himawari-12-2-W210-H250.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at how you've grown up!

Harte

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem the Myth Busters had was that the external mirror has to track the Sun, otherwise the light is only good for a couple minutes. Surely the ancients didn't have Sun tracking equipment like we use today on photo voltaic collection devices.

Sure they did. It's called a person.

I thought though that it was determined that olive oil burns soot-free and that he AE had access to other similar quality oils.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.