spud the mackem Posted October 19, 2014 #26 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Whatever age we are in at the moment, we are all still swimming around in a barrel of crap. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ealdwita Posted October 19, 2014 #27 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Whatever age we are in at the moment, we are all still swimming around in a barrel of crap. That's a thought......Why don't we just call it the SEWage! Boom-boom! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted October 19, 2014 #28 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Maybe in the end geology will create three major divisions -- pre-life, post-life, and human. That will be something for scientists a million or so years from now to decide. At the moment I get the feeling the objective here is to emphasize (and maybe over-emphasize) the human effect. This may be accurate but also sounds political. (I find myself in the awkward position of not wanting to downplay human effects since I think they are real and serious, but at the same time wanting to keep politics out of science). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted October 19, 2014 #29 Share Posted October 19, 2014 (edited) For those who seem a little confused about geological time scales: We determine the boundaries, based upon what we find in the geological layers. Could be that trilobite fossils appear, or dinosaur fossils no longer appear. Ice sheet advances and retreats, large geological events, eutherian mammal fossils appear, primate fossil first appear, etc. edit: added larger images Edited October 19, 2014 by Imaginarynumber1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted October 19, 2014 #30 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Could you provide your link: I'd love to have that in my bookmarks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted October 19, 2014 #31 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Could you provide your link: I'd love to have that in my bookmarks. I just went to google and searched "geological time" and went to the images. https://www.google.com/search?q=geological+time&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=JjpEVJCDMpe3yASh4ICIAw&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1440&bih=799 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted October 19, 2014 #32 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Now I coulda done that! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted October 19, 2014 #33 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Now I coulda done that! But you didn't, Frank. You didn't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woopypooky Posted October 21, 2014 #34 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Does it matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Supertypo Posted October 21, 2014 #35 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Didint they post this last year already or am I mistaken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightLady Posted October 21, 2014 #36 Share Posted October 21, 2014 (edited) I have no idea what that means. I could do the research but I don't want to. I will take an incomplete in this class. Edited October 21, 2014 by MidnightLady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug1029 Posted October 22, 2014 #37 Share Posted October 22, 2014 So, while it might be reasonable to say this is the Anthropocene Age, it cannot be classified as a new epoch unless the geology actually exhibits distinct change. A type locality for the Anthropocene has not been designated. As of right now, it is not a recognized epoch. However, that could change at any time. Waters et al. (2014) propose 1945 as the beginning of the Holocene as several climate and geologic indicators maximize at about that time. Doug Waters, C. N., J. A. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, A. M. Snelling. 2014. A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene? Geological Society of London, Special Publications 2014 (395) 1-21. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ealdwita Posted October 22, 2014 #38 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Waters, C. N., J. A. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, A. M. Snelling. 2014. A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene? Geological Society of London, Special Publications 2014 (395) 1-21. I shall rush out and purchase a copy first thing in the morning. Please don't tell me how it ends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted October 22, 2014 #39 Share Posted October 22, 2014 It seems to me this is political (a bit of environmentalist propaganda), not scientific, although poorly camouflaged. It's the sort of thing that could then be used to "prove" to grade schoolers how mankind is ruining the planet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug1029 Posted October 22, 2014 #40 Share Posted October 22, 2014 A type locality for the Anthropocene has not been designated. As of right now, it is not a recognized epoch. However, that could change at any time. Waters et al. (2014) propose 1945 as the beginning of the Holocene as several climate and geologic indicators maximize at about that time. Doug Waters, C. N., J. A. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, A. M. Snelling. 2014. A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene? Geological Society of London, Special Publications 2014 (395) 1-21. That should say "...the beginning of the Anthropocene..." Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug1029 Posted October 22, 2014 #41 Share Posted October 22, 2014 It seems to me this is political (a bit of environmentalist propaganda), not scientific, although poorly camouflaged. It's the sort of thing that could then be used to "prove" to grade schoolers how mankind is ruining the planet. There are several scientific studies out suggesting dates and definitions for the beginning of the Anthropocene. At this time, however, the geology professional societies have not adopted any of them. Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug1029 Posted October 22, 2014 #42 Share Posted October 22, 2014 I shall rush out and purchase a copy first thing in the morning. Please don't tell me how it ends. It's a research paper. If you have an .edu site, you can download it for free. You may get it for free anyway. Just have to try and see. Doug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now