UM-Bot Posted October 27, 2014 #1 Share Posted October 27, 2014 A prominent London museum once appealed to bounty hunters to help secure the body of the creature. When sightings of the famous Loch Ness Monster were first reported back in the 1930s, the creature's existence was taken quite seriously, even among academics. Read More: http://www.unexplain...t-plot-revealed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBelieveWhatIWant Posted October 27, 2014 #2 Share Posted October 27, 2014 My guess is it wouldn't say on the plaque "This is the remains of the famous Loch Ness Monster which we hired bounty hunters to kill to display here". 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJNYC Posted October 27, 2014 #3 Share Posted October 27, 2014 At least now they aren't trying to kill it. Step in the right direction. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted October 27, 2014 #4 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Interesting situation. I wonder if the creature had existed and if it had been shot who would have been able to keep the meat? Would they serve Nessie cutlets at a high priced fund raising dinner, or allowed the hunter to stock his and his extended families freezer for a year to come? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junior Chubb Posted October 27, 2014 #5 Share Posted October 27, 2014 I think the used the wrong Bounty Hunter. If you need to capture a water based cryptid, this is the guy for the job... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pallidin Posted October 27, 2014 #6 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Didn't someone(s) offer a similar "Dead or Alive" bounty hunt of Bigfoot? Which of course never came to fruition for either. What's wrong with some people?? You just don't go around killing a potentially unknown, and likely highly endangered, member of a species just because you want to make money off of it in a museum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atuke Posted October 27, 2014 #7 Share Posted October 27, 2014 I'm happy today's thinking doesn't include killing a possibly rare specie. With today's technology we should be able to produce hard facts and proof anytime now of this creature and othe elusive species. Although it won't be as entertaining a mystery when this happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stardrive Posted October 27, 2014 #8 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Since the 30's science has answered the question of how the Loch was formed. It was formed by thousands of years of intense glaciation and the Loch we know today is what remains after the glaciers retreated about 10k years ago. So the chances of a relic sauropod living there in modern times is slim to none and slims out of town. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stardrive Posted October 27, 2014 #9 Share Posted October 27, 2014 (edited) double post Edited October 27, 2014 by Stardrive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: Posted October 27, 2014 #10 Share Posted October 27, 2014 (edited) I think the used the wrong Bounty Hunter. If you need to capture a water based cryptid, this is the guy for the job... He probably had prior commitments, not to mention the one who hired him can choke hold someone to death. Edited October 27, 2014 by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paperdyer Posted October 27, 2014 #11 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Didn't someone(s) offer a similar "Dead or Alive" bounty hunt of Bigfoot? Which of course never came to fruition for either. What's wrong with some people?? You just don't go around killing a potentially unknown, and likely highly endangered, member of a species just because you want to make money off of it in a museum. Isn't that what humans do to "preserve" the species? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikenator Posted October 27, 2014 #12 Share Posted October 27, 2014 I once saw the Loch Ness monster he was hanging out in a puddle in front of my house after it rained I was like hey loch Ness monster what the hell are you doing sitting here in a puddle aren't you supposed to be in the loch ness then he started talking about how he needed tree fiddy to get home 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundew Posted October 28, 2014 #13 Share Posted October 28, 2014 An outrage!! Had the Scots known this sooner, the vote to leave the Empire might have turned out differently! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayde Posted October 28, 2014 #14 Share Posted October 28, 2014 I remember reading about this years back! Can't recall where from mind, but one reason put forward as to why it wasn't a goer was simple. Somebody had the brains to realise that any "remains" brought in from the alas dead Nessie (and it would have been a case of "Oops, pardon us, but we had to kill it. Bloody thing just wouldn't play along..." might not have been that of an unknown animal but most like a whale or something on those lines! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psyche101 Posted October 28, 2014 #15 Share Posted October 28, 2014 So Hilarious in retrospect, yet people are still reporting Bigfoot. The mind boggles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineffectiveArtist Posted October 28, 2014 #16 Share Posted October 28, 2014 I really find the idea of a single plesiosaur living in the bottom of a lake really unlikely. Still, it'd be really cool. Maybe there's more than one of them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now