Waspie_Dwarf Posted March 8, 2015 #1 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Fastest Star in Our Galaxy Propelled by a Thermonuclear Supernova A team of astronomers, including University of Hawaii at Manoa astronomer Eugene Magnier, used the 10-meter Keck II and Pan-STARRS1 telescopes in Hawaii to find a star that breaks the galactic speed record. It travels at about 1,200 kilometers per second (about 2.7 million mph), a speed that will enable the star to escape from our Milky Way galaxy.“At that speed, you could travel from Earth to the moon in 5 minutes,” Magnier commented. The team showed that unlike the half-dozen other known escaping stars, this compact star was ejected from an extremely tight binary by a thermonuclear supernova explosion. These results will be published in the March 6 issue of the journal Science. Read more... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubblykiss Posted March 11, 2015 #2 Share Posted March 11, 2015 That free-bird of a star should keep in mind, it is not only the destination that matters, but also the voyage. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athena1979 Posted March 11, 2015 #3 Share Posted March 11, 2015 he's a loner...and a loners got to be alone. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithisco Posted March 11, 2015 #4 Share Posted March 11, 2015 In other words a theoretical double thermonuclear event propelled this star at this velocity. Sorry, a theory, based on an assumption, leading to a synthesis of events does not make for good science.... just IMO of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paperdyer Posted March 11, 2015 #5 Share Posted March 11, 2015 In other words a theoretical double thermonuclear event propelled this star at this velocity. Sorry, a theory, based on an assumption, leading to a synthesis of events does not make for good science.... just IMO of course Isn't that how science is done? You have a theory based on an observation which leads to an assumption that you try to prove. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just_Seeking Posted March 11, 2015 #6 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Words really can hurt you Athena1979. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJNYC Posted March 11, 2015 #7 Share Posted March 11, 2015 he's a loner...and a loners got to be alone. We should name the star: Jessie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsurugi Posted March 11, 2015 #8 Share Posted March 11, 2015 @paperdyer: That's right, except you're supposed to try and disprove your assumptions, not prove them. Nothing can be proved 100%, so theory testing is supposed to be done with falsification. The longer the theory holds up, the stronger it becomes...but it can never be totally "proven". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted March 11, 2015 #9 Share Posted March 11, 2015 @paperdyer: That's right, except you're supposed to try and disprove your assumptions, not prove them. Nothing can be proved 100%, so theory testing is supposed to be done with falsification. The longer the theory holds up, the stronger it becomes...but it can never be totally "proven". Nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsurugi Posted March 11, 2015 #10 Share Posted March 11, 2015 In other words a theoretical double thermonuclear event propelled this star at this velocity. Sorry, a theory, based on an assumption, leading to a synthesis of events does not make for good science.... just IMO of course True, but if there was a supernova the remnants would still be visible. I haven't seen the paper but I'd bet they traced Speedracer Star here back along it's path and found the remnants of a binary supernova. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moon tide Posted March 12, 2015 #11 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Stars, being massive compared to, say, the size of the Earth, 1200 km per second still seems quite ponderous to me. He'll just wander off from the galaxy when he's ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highdesert50 Posted March 12, 2015 #12 Share Posted March 12, 2015 I could imagine a technologically advanced civilization putting a planet in an appropriate orbit around a comparable unbound star and using it as a vehicle for extended travel. Generations could pass while living in an uncompromised environment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.J. Posted March 12, 2015 #13 Share Posted March 12, 2015 A real shooting star! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRYSiiSx2 Posted March 12, 2015 #14 Share Posted March 12, 2015 So it travels roughly 42 million miles a year right? Light is something like 6.5? I dunno I'm really drunk and am just justing testing my math Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted March 12, 2015 #15 Share Posted March 12, 2015 (edited) So it travels roughly 42 million miles a year right? Light is something like 6.5? I dunno I'm really drunk and am just justing testing my math Test drunkenness: passed. Test math: failed. Edited March 12, 2015 by toast 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted March 12, 2015 #16 Share Posted March 12, 2015 So it travels roughly 42 million miles a year right? Light is something like 6.5? I dunno I'm really drunk and am just justing testing my math Light moves at around 5,9 trillion miles a year (9,46 trillion kilometers for us in the civilised World !). So you are only out by a factor of a million. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted March 12, 2015 #17 Share Posted March 12, 2015 I could imagine a technologically advanced civilization putting a planet in an appropriate orbit around a comparable unbound star and using it as a vehicle for extended travel. Generations could pass while living in an uncompromised environment. You have a brilliant imagination! And all this time we thought they were traveling through wormholes...interesting. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now