Wickian Posted January 9, 2016 #726 Share Posted January 9, 2016 This was interesting to me. I wonder if anything real will come of it though. http://www.lifezette...mitted-a-crime/ The Democrat establishment is so wrapped up with Hillary, that even if she is charged with a Felony and Convicted, they will want to continue running her. Didn't Clinton say she received no documents marked as classified. Maybe this is what she meant, she had her staff remove the classified marking before sending them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted January 9, 2016 #727 Share Posted January 9, 2016 Didn't Clinton say she received no documents marked as classified. Maybe this is what she meant, she had her staff remove the classified marking before sending them. The reality is that it wouldn't matter, as far as the law is concerned, whether they were marked classified or not as you are supposed to know classified material when you see it. The rule is, if in doubt report it. It is impossible to believe that she wouldn't have recognized any of the 1300+ (so far) emails as containing classified material. The Clinton camp is using this not marked BS as an excuse and no agency would accept such an excuse. Her actions after being informed of the breach are the most damning of all. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jim Posted January 9, 2016 #728 Share Posted January 9, 2016 The fact that she's dickering over what was, or was not, marked Classified, show's a lack of concern over the true nature of the information that passed through her hands. As Secretary of State, one would assume that all correspondence was confidential in nature, whether or not it was labeled as such. She's now pointing at labels as a way to avoid prosecution with no regard for whose hands the emails may have fallen into. In international politics there's no telling what information might be useful to an enemy whether we think it's that important or not. Anyone worthy of the position would know that and act accordingly. She's like a kid pleading innocence because "you never told me not to break a window." 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickian Posted January 9, 2016 #729 Share Posted January 9, 2016 The reality is that it wouldn't matter, as far as the law is concerned, whether they were marked classified or not as you are supposed to know classified material when you see it. The rule is, if in doubt report it. It is impossible to believe that she wouldn't have recognized any of the 1300+ (so far) emails as containing classified material. The Clinton camp is using this not marked BS as an excuse and no agency would accept such an excuse. Her actions after being informed of the breach are the most damning of all. Well the FBI should be announcing whether or not they'll pursue charges within the next month or two. Hopefully they will. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted January 10, 2016 #730 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Well the FBI should be announcing whether or not they'll pursue charges within the next month or two. Hopefully they will. If they decide not to, Super Bowl Sunday at about two in the morning is when they'll announce. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted January 10, 2016 #731 Share Posted January 10, 2016 (edited) To anyone out there that knows anything about classified information, all I can say is this article is chilling. Unbelievable. http://observer.com/...e-goes-nuclear/ This is far worse than even I thought possible. In a nutshell, Sid Blumentahl, a rea sleezy character who worked for Bill way back when, was expressly forbidden by Obama from any dealings with his administration. Hillary had him on her payroll anyways, through the Clinton Foundation, and apparently Sid had access to NSA Top Secret Sensitive Compartmentalized Information from the NSA and sent it to Hillary through her unsecured email server. Why and how did this ever happen and what kind of idiot would want this type of human being in the White House? Edited January 10, 2016 by Merc14 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DieChecker Posted January 10, 2016 #732 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Maybe all these new email revelations are what caused the slow down in releasing of documents. They have to have lots of meetings on what to cover up, and how to cover it, and if they can successfully cover it. They need to cover their own backsides, and so stuff that probably they wanted to not release had to be released, or their own bacon would be on the line down the road. If they redacted stuff that they shouldn't have, eventually it would come out and they'd be accused of political bias. Anyway, I can't believe she still isn't getting beaten up by this stuff. If this was Cruz, or Rubio, they would be forced to abandon their campaign for President. But... because she's a Clinton and all hopes are wrapped up in her, she can't be abandoned. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted January 10, 2016 #733 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Maybe all these new email revelations are what caused the slow down in releasing of documents. They have to have lots of meetings on what to cover up, and how to cover it, and if they can successfully cover it. They need to cover their own backsides, and so stuff that probably they wanted to not release had to be released, or their own bacon would be on the line down the road. If they redacted stuff that they shouldn't have, eventually it would come out and they'd be accused of political bias. Anyway, I can't believe she still isn't getting beaten up by this stuff. If this was Cruz, or Rubio, they would be forced to abandon their campaign for President. But... because she's a Clinton and all hopes are wrapped up in her, she can't be abandoned. Democrats only care about criminals that aren't democrats and most of the mainstream media is democrat as are most of the newspapers, late night shows and other assorted garbage. Failure can't be hidden, however, and there are still some honorable folks so let us see what the FBI does with that most corrupt of Attorney Generals since Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch. Two scumbags in charge of US justice. That is the new democrat party. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DieChecker Posted January 10, 2016 #734 Share Posted January 10, 2016 Well, if she does fall, she'll fall HARD, and you can bet that once she is down, EVERYONE will pile on and gang up on her. They are like sharks in that. They will cooperate right up to the point where one of them is injured, and then they all turn on that one. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted January 11, 2016 #735 Share Posted January 11, 2016 (edited) The other shoe just dropped and finally, FINALLY, the FBI is investigating Hillary for connections between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department while she was in office and if this connection violated public corruption laws. Only the most insipid fool could look at the evidence and not come to the conclusion that Clinton was selling influence for dollars. I have been b****ing about this for years but never though the feds would finally go after the crook but it looks like the Obama administration has p***ed off the FBI Director enough for him to shoot Lynch the bird and go after the Clinton machine. Read more: http://www.thepoliti.../#ixzz3wycpbXnR The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) just dropped a bombshell that will shake up the 2016 Presidential election. The FBI is officially expanding their criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a home email server while Secretary of State. The question is if the connections between the Clinton Foundation work and State Department violated public corruption laws. This is a new focus of the investigation, on top of examining classified documents that were inappropriately transmitted. “The agents are investigating the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed,” one source said. The development follows press reports over the past year about the potential overlap of State Department and Clinton Foundation work, and questions over whether donors benefited from their contacts inside the administration. The Clinton Foundation is a public charity, known as a 501©(3). It had grants and contributions in excess of $144 million in 2013, the most current available data. Inside the FBI, pressure is growing to pursue the case. Read more: http://www.thepoliti.../#ixzz3wydwK1HA The Governor of Virginia is heading to jail for far less than Hillary has done but he is a republican so.... Edited January 11, 2016 by Merc14 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted January 13, 2016 #736 Share Posted January 13, 2016 Latest development. Clinton orders aide to fax sensitive documents over unsecured fax line. In one email exchange dated June 2011, Clinton instructed her top policy advisor Jacob Sullivan to send her talking points — which were scheduled to be forwarded over the State Department's secured network — over a non-secure fax line. Sullivan reported a problem with the State Department's secure transmission system, so Clinton told him to wipe off any "identifying heading" and send it over using a regular fax line. Source 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted January 15, 2016 #737 Share Posted January 15, 2016 (edited) This meme is hilarious. Must see... Edit: I didn't know it had sound until I posted the link. It was funnier silent but whatever... Edited January 15, 2016 by F3SS 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Grey Posted January 15, 2016 #738 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Latest development. Clinton orders aide to fax sensitive documents over unsecured fax line. In one email exchange dated June 2011, Clinton instructed her top policy advisor Jacob Sullivan to send her talking points — which were scheduled to be forwarded over the State Department's secured network — over a non-secure fax line. Sullivan reported a problem with the State Department's secure transmission system, so Clinton told him to wipe off any "identifying heading" and send it over using a regular fax line. Source I'll put $10 down that Hillary doesn't even have a password on her home computer. Here's a leaked screenshot of her desktop: ...that sums up everything Hillary Clinton knows about digital security. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted January 15, 2016 #739 Share Posted January 15, 2016 I'll put $10 down that Hillary doesn't even have a password on her home computer. Here's a leaked screenshot of her desktop: ...that sums up everything Hillary Clinton knows about digital security. Is that real? My grandmas computer isn't even that bad. Between her not knowing anything about it and all the grandkids that play games and load her machine up with viruses, well you get the point. But good god. That purple monkey is bringing back memories of the napster era. Is that thing from limewire or something? Regardless, that screenshot looks like a completely hijacked machine. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted January 15, 2016 #740 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Or is that from Bearshare? That was my first thought and there is a bear on the task bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Grey Posted January 15, 2016 #741 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Or is that from Bearshare? That was my first thought and there is a bear on the task bar. The purple guy is BonziBuddy: a classic piece of adware from days past. The rest of that screenshot causes my soul to ache. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted January 15, 2016 #742 Share Posted January 15, 2016 The purple guy is BonziBuddy: a classic piece of adware from days past. The rest of that screenshot causes my soul to ache. Lol I knew I knew that guy from way back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.ZZ. Posted January 15, 2016 #743 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Thank you for reminding me why I hate MSN. Is there enough clutter? What a mess. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickian Posted January 15, 2016 #744 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Thank you for reminding me why I hate MSN. Is there enough clutter? What a mess. I remember the old days of MSN and AOL. You'd get a cd in the mail every week for a new version and always set the internet connection to block incoming phone calls so you didn't get booted offline. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Skellington Posted January 20, 2016 Author #745 Share Posted January 20, 2016 It only gets worse for her from here. Above Top Secret emails. She's sunk. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-clinton-emails-contained-info-above-top-secret-ig-n499886 Such a weak candidate that Bernie the Grey is giving her a run for our money. The socialist is winning. That tells you all you need to know about dem voters. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glockornothing Posted January 20, 2016 #746 Share Posted January 20, 2016 It only gets worse for her from here. Above Top Secret emails. She's sunk. http://www.nbcnews.c...cret-ig-n499886 Such a weak candidate that Bernie the Grey is giving her a run for our money. The socialist is winning. That tells you all you need to know about dem voters. She should do the honorable thing, grab Bernie and move to China never to be seen again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2-B Posted January 20, 2016 #747 Share Posted January 20, 2016 It only gets worse for her from here. Above Top Secret emails. She's sunk. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-clinton-emails-contained-info-above-top-secret-ig-n499886 Such a weak candidate that Bernie the Grey is giving her a run for our money. The socialist is winning. That tells you all you need to know about dem voters. I heard on the news today that 43% of Iowa voters consider themselves Socialists. I admit I was doing something else at the time and want to hope that was 43% of Dems in Iowa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted January 20, 2016 #748 Share Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) Today it was announced that Hillary had two Top Secret SAP message on her unsecured email server. These are Special Access Programs that are strictly need to know which means even if you had a TS clearance you wouldn't have access to this info unless specifically read in. This includes the President. This idiot had them on an unsecured, virtually open server for all the world to hijack. Why is this woman not under indictment? http://dailycaller.c...private-server/ PS. Seems like her proud defenders on this thread have flown the coup with nary a word of contrition. Edited January 20, 2016 by Merc14 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Skellington Posted January 20, 2016 Author #749 Share Posted January 20, 2016 The ONLY reason she has had any support in the primary is because her only opponent is a complete joke. The choices democrats have been presented with are dumb and dumber. Or as one pundit put it-- choose evil, or choose stupid. Hillary support is artificial at best only because her alternative is so ridiculous. It's by democrat design. They are trying to force dem supporters to vote for her given the weak alternative. They see it as Hillary or nothing, by design. I started another thread asking who's gonna fill her birkenstocks when she gets indicted. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.ZZ. Posted January 20, 2016 #750 Share Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) Today it was announced that Hillary had two Top Secret SAP message on her unsecured email server. These are Special Access Programs that are strictly need to know which means even if you had a TS clearance you wouldn't have access to this info unless specifically read in. This includes the President. This idiot had them on an unsecured, virtually open server for all the world to hijack. Why is this woman not under indictment? http://dailycaller.c...private-server/ PS. Seems like her proud defenders on this thread have flown the coup with nary a word of contrition. Her defenders are just grasping for straws at this point. You know Alan Colmes the liberal talking head that has a radio program and appears on cable TV? He was confronted with this latest revelation, and spouted something like: "Even if this is true, exactly what harm was done? Point out who was hurt by this. The New York Times even published these so-called secrets." Unbelievable. And her campaign again said the whole thing was a republican conspiracy. Yeah, sure, the IG, FBI, et al. are all in on this? Hillary for prison 2016! Edited January 20, 2016 by ZZ430 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now