Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Donald Trump Enters 2016 Presidential Race


aztek

Recommended Posts

CM-QV_yUAAAe4rf.jpg

Aug 21, 2015 Calgary, Canada-- Global Warming inaction.

July was the hottest month on record, globally speaking. Not that you'd notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joking? even if it was a ******* joke,it should discredit the evil woman from ever holding any position of responsibility. Dear old Ron Reagan's "I have just signed legislation to outlaw Russia" was obviously a joke; this really doesn't look like one, and besides, even if it was, doesn't the fact that she might have thought to even make a joke of it say all you need to know about her character? .

Why should that discredit her from holding any position of responsibility? And I've yet to see how that quote demonstrates she's evil. She said, "We came, we saw, he died," as if we burned him with super-heat-ray-vision or something. At worst, it would be considered in bad taste, but evil? Hardly.

The outlawing Russia bit was a joke, sure, but it was still the Cold War, and was definitely in bad taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

July was the hottest month on record, globally speaking. Not that you'd notice.

Global warming wishful thinkers like to say "It isn't about the weather" whenever it isn't warm weather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Global warming wishful thinkers like to say "It isn't about the weather" whenever it isn't warm weather.

There are those of us who know the difference between weather and climate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet you point out that it was a warm July.

You don't see this inconsistency in yourself?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet you point out that it was a warm July.

You don't see this inconsistency in yourself?

No inconsistency.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/20/us/noaa-global-climate-analysis/

July saw the highest average temperatures since record-keeping began -- globally, not just in the United States -- the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported Thursday.

Globally, the first seven months of the year also had all-time highs. The latest global temperature data make it likely that 2015 will be the hottest year on record, the agency said.

Like I said, climate, not weather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed over the years. Summer is often warmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Global warming wishful thinkers like to say "It isn't about the weather" whenever it isn't warm weather.

thats why it's called "climate change" these days ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should have never went into Iraq or Lybia nor should we have supported the Shaw of Iran. Need to leave Syria alone too. If the people don't like their leader let them take care of it. Our infrastructure is falling apart yet we keep blowing money on wars, buying friends or supporting illegals and refugees. Time to take care of America first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and just what are his Policies, and where is his connection with the average citizen of the USA? Has he really had to suffer any of the privations that lead from unemployment or minimum wage income?

He is also a very poor businessman, having filed for Chapter 11 protection for at least 4 of his companies - would you really trust this man to run the economy of the USA?

He said that he used legal Chapter 11 to protect his companies from some "bad a** bankers." Of course, he probably wasn't calling them bad when they were lending those companies money. Nevertheless, the companies survived, and he's worth 10 billion dollars. Maybe he can "chapter 11" some of our national debt. :whistle:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, you can't tell she was joking, can you?

Gadafi was tortured and murdered on video. Have you seen it?

HC was in Libya when it happened. She was about to be interviewed when she was notified he was killed.

This is how she reacted immediately upon hearing the news:

"we came, we saw, he died!!!.... hahaha(throwing her head back slapping her hands together)

What kind of joke is this? Did you laugh bud? Think it was funny?

Laughing at another individuals death.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gadafi was tortured and murdered on video. Have you seen it?

HC was in Libya when it happened. She was about to be interviewed when she was notified he was killed.

This is how she reacted immediately upon hearing the news:

"we came, we saw, he died!!!.... hahaha(throwing her head back slapping her hands together)

What kind of joke is this? Did you laugh bud? Think it was funny?...Laughing at another individuals death?

That's messed up man.... HC, then SOS, showed her true colors that day. She's messed up. Now running again for POTUS.

The president of America, the supposed beacon of the free world, should NEVER lower themselves to this level of immoral stature.

She may not be evil.... whatever that means anyhow.... but one thing is for certain 100%.... She's got some major issues going on in her head.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should that discredit her from holding any position of responsibility? And I've yet to see how that quote demonstrates she's evil. She said, "We came, we saw, he died," as if we burned him with super-heat-ray-vision or something. At worst, it would be considered in bad taste, but evil? Hardly.

The outlawing Russia bit was a joke, sure, but it was still the Cold War, and was definitely in bad taste.

The cackle wasn't a clue? the slapping of her knee? The gloating generally, considering that M. Gadaffi hadn't been any realistic threat to the US since the 1980s (if one does accept that he was responsible for supporting terrorism; he was certainly never any realistic military threat)? The fact that, as pointed out above, the U.S. had begun to normalise relations with the same Gadaffi a few years earlier (even Tony Blair had a meeting with him in his tent in the desert)? Isn't the way that the attitude of the new Administration towards him suddenly swung against him suspicious in itself, since the pretext for taking military action against him (that he would ruthlessly Suppress an uprising against him) so flimsy right from the start?
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a very simple and effective way to better inform voters about the candidates: all MSM coverage should show a list of each candidates donors next to a picture of the candidate. Just bullet point lists of company names and they amount they contributed. It will say so much without having to say a lot.

Also, IMPLEMENT ONLINE VOTING. It's silly that I can do banking on my phone but to vote I still have to drive to a voting office and write stuff on slips of paper. IMO they are all dragging their feet on this because online voting would mean a hell of a lot more votes compared to the turnout we have now. We can't b**** and moan about things always staying the same when the democratic process isn't even being used to it's full potential.

Uhh... how could you ever have confidence that the process wasn't hacked? There would never be another election where the people accepted the results.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cackle wasn't a clue? the slapping of her knee? The gloating generally, considering that M. Gadaffi hadn't been any realistic threat to the US since the 1980s (if one does accept that he was responsible for supporting terrorism; he was certainly never any realistic military threat)? The fact that, as pointed out above, the U.S. had begun to normalise relations with the same Gadaffi a few years earlier (even Tony Blair had a meeting with him in his tent in the desert)? Isn't the way that the attitude of the new Administration towards him suddenly swung against him suspicious in itself, since the pretext for taking military action against him (that he would ruthlessly Suppress an uprising against him) so flimsy right from the start?

Apparently, opening fire on demonstrators, and then sending in tanks and snipers in helicopters for support is generally frowned upon by the international community.

Who'd have guessed, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, opening fire on demonstrators, and then sending in tanks and snipers in helicopters for support is generally frowned upon by the international community.

Who'd have guessed, right?

So I guess Israel is next, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, opening fire on demonstrators, and then sending in tanks and snipers in helicopters for support is generally frowned upon by the international community.

Who'd have guessed, right?

\yeah,. and bombing the crap out of the country and destroying it as a functioning state is really a way to help the oppressed people of *insert name of oppressed country here*. Works really well every single time they do it, doesn't it. Who gave the Obama administration (and of course his friends Cameron and Sarkozy) authorisation to be the world's policeman anyway?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

\yeah,. and bombing the crap out of the country and destroying it as a functioning state

Oh, really? And which non-military assets do you believe that they targeted, exactly?

Who gave the Obama administration (and of course his friends Cameron and Sarkozy) authorisation to be the world's policeman anyway?

All 15 voting members of the UN Security Council, including China and Russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I guess Israel is next, right?

I must have missed the news report of the Israeli's using snipers from helicopters firing on their own citizens indiscriminately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

\yeah,. and bombing the crap out of the country and destroying it as a functioning state is really a way to help the oppressed people of *insert name of oppressed country here*. Works really well every single time they do it, doesn't it. Who gave the Obama administration (and of course his friends Cameron and Sarkozy) authorisation to be the world's policeman anyway?

I really believe they (the powers that be) are doing this to destabilize the world so that their "new world order" agenda can be implemented. The throngs of refugees (N. Africa and Syria) and migrants (Mexico) ... well, I think that end game is to end nationalism in Europe and the U.S.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, opening fire on demonstrators, and then sending in tanks and snipers in helicopters for support is generally frowned upon by the international community.

Who'd have guessed, right?

The difference isn't the unanimous vote in the UN or the firing on demonstrators. Qaddafi wasn't our "ally", that's the difference.

I must have missed the news report of the Israeli's using snipers from helicopters firing on their own citizens indiscriminately.

Oh that's right! The people they're living on top of aren't citizens! Touche. No consistency or humanity to it, but touche anyway.

But I know, let's defend the bureaucratic Column A and Column B, and put what our allies do in column A and what our enemies do in column B. Then we can begin to nitpick what weapons are terroristic from which aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

posting from an android phone

you are never , ever , to blame the android again ...

:)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference isn't the unanimous vote in the UN or the firing on demonstrators. Qaddafi wasn't our "ally", that's the difference.

It was actually the first unanimous vote by the UN to refer any country to the International Criminal Court, ever.

It's almost as if they'd outraged the entire international community.

Oh that's right! The people they're living on top of aren't citizens!

It's that three letter word "Own" that you're finding tricky today, isn't it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.