LV-426 Posted June 20, 2016 #101 Share Posted June 20, 2016 46 minutes ago, RabidMongoose said: If politicians close down Democracy in their country on topics such as mass-immigration then I think its inappropriate to label people having a pop at them as being mentally ill. If I campaigned for anti-immigration policies I would find politicians quickly trying to silence me. They would tell the public I am a racist or extremist then try to deny me a platform for spreading such hateful views. This is what our Democracy has come too where everybody who doesn't conform to a narrow set of views has to run the gauntlet of verbal annihilation. Its not group think either, they know what they are doing, its their strategy for getting rid of everyone so only their views are used to formulate policy. Its why we have people like Farage pointing out that if the politicians across the EU refuse to represent then sooner of later there is a revolution coming as it will be the only way people can stand up for themselves. I'm not disputing that people backed into a corner can and do turn to violence. I'm just stating that this particular brand of violence is an entirely different set of mental processes to a politically-motivated "execution". There's not much point me using my amateur psychology any further if people aren't buying it. Better to take it to the Philosophy and Psychology section and see if there are any behavioural analysts here, who can add credence to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Wellington Posted June 20, 2016 #102 Share Posted June 20, 2016 13 minutes ago, LV-426 said: I'm not disputing that people backed into a corner can and do turn to violence. I'm just stating that this particular brand of violence is an entirely different set of mental processes to a politically-motivated "execution". There's not much point me using my amateur psychology any further if people aren't buying it. Better to take it to the Philosophy and Psychology section and see if there are any behavioural analysts here, who can add credence to it. Bearing in mind we don't know the full facts and the offender hasn't been evaluated yet you're jumping the gun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bee Posted June 21, 2016 #103 Share Posted June 21, 2016 On 6/19/2016 at 10:20 PM, Bloodflower said: History repeating again. Way back in 2003 before the EU refurendum in Sweden, Anna Lindh (pro-EU) was killed. Thanks - I had forgotten about that --- coincidence or not.? transcript extract from the trial in Sweden - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3397637.stm Apparently the Thomas Mair trial will take place under terrorism protocol - I don't know what the protocols are but I expect it means that there will be secrecy? https://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/jo-cox-murder-suspect-to-appear-in-court-under-terrorism-pro?utm_term=.iv1xvjNdy#.bmn5qXvr6 Mr Justice Sweeney told the court Mair’s case was being dealt with under the UK’s anti-terrorism protocol and that Mair will appear again at the Old Bailey on the court’s terrorism list on Thursday morning. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now