Merc14 Posted September 9, 2016 #126 Share Posted September 9, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, Liquid Gardens said: That FDR is consistently ranked as one of the greatest presidents should tell us how accurate and legitimate the eyes of the voters are when assessing disabilities though. His performance puts lie to the idea that an illness should be a reason to disqualify a person. If Hillary actually has any illness, we're not in the ballpark of polio. FDR being one of our greatest presidents is a real stretch and definitely in the eyes of the beholder. This ridiculous analogy started by Aquatus that some presidents were ill and therefore any illness is fine needs to be stopped now. We are talking about brain damage with Clinton, NOT crippled legs and anyone who claims the two are analogous is not thinking straight. That FDR had trouble walking is not the same as Hillary, who told the FBI she had many memory losses and whose husband stated on TV that she had a very severe concussion that took months to recover from and that she still suffers from. Hillary had more than a concussion she had severe cerebral thrombosis and a history of deep venus thrombosis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerebral_venous_sinus_thrombosis These are not "bumps to the head" as alluded to above and they have long term and sometimes dire effects. Regardless, if someone wants to make the case that a crippled president is the same as a brain damaged one then please feel free, we all need a laugh. Edited September 9, 2016 by Merc14 3 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now