Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

If Clinton Does Win


Paranormal Panther

Recommended Posts

If Clinton wins, Trump will, for the next few months, whine about how the election was "rigged" 

If Trump wins, he will say nothing about election rigging, other than to say that it wasn't rigged enough for Clinton to win, and that the holy HE stopped it.

- Clinton's address to Congress...

My fellow Americans...

- Trump's address to Congress...

My sheeples...

 

Edited by pallidin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Likely Guy said:

How much do you intend to read into what I actually say?

There's a lot of that going around these days. Anyway, I just want an example of his "racism".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Arbenol said:

There's a lot of deplorables about  - on both sides - both within and outside of the system itself. But we do tend to tolerate deplorables, as long as they're our kind of deplorable.

That's true to a great extent. On my supposed political side, I find Ann Coulter to be deplorable, as is anybody who jokes about dead children. Her "joke" was about John Edwards' deceased child who was ill or injured before he passed. She said that his mom (now deceased) had a bumpersticker that read, "ask me about my dead child", and her sick comment was deplorable beyond all toleration.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pallidin said:

If Clinton wins, Trump will, for the next few months, whine about how the election was "rigged" 

If Trump wins, he will say nothing about election rigging, other than to say that it wasn't rigged enough for Clinton to win, and that the holy HE stopped it.

- Clinton's address to Congress...

My fellow Americans...

- Trump's address to Congress...

My sheeples...

Hillary must routinely feed chum to you. You're about as much of a conservative Republican as Colin Powell. You have to know that it's not about loving or liking Trump. It's about keeping Clinton out of the White House.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, coolguy said:

Iam stocked up on plenty of ammo cause u never know what will happen lol

I stocked up on pebbles for my sling shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paranormal Panther said:

There's a lot of that going around these days. Anyway, I just want an example of his "racism".

Well, "certain people are like this, or like this" but if I quantify it with, "I suppose, some of those people might be good", that makes it all okay?

DJT is a racist.

Edited by Likely Guy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paranormal Panther said:

That's true to a great extent. On my supposed political side, I find Ann Coulter to be deplorable, as is anybody who jokes about dead children. Her "joke" was about John Edwards' deceased child who was ill or injured before he passed. She said that his mom (now deceased) had a bumpersticker that read, "ask me about my dead child", and her sick comment was deplorable beyond all toleration.

Surely calling her "deplorable" is actually a compliment. She's way worse than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Paranormal Panther said:

There's a lot of that going around these days. Anyway, I just want an example of his "racism".

Bill Clinton Paid $20,000 to Play Golf in All-White Club While Trump Was Demanding Blacks And Jews Be Allowed To Play At His Clubs

Now here is where things get interesting. Clinton paid $20,000 in initiation fees and a $150 monthly fee for the dubious "privilege" of playing in a white-only club.

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2016/bill-clinton-paid-20000-to-play-golf-in-all-white-club-while-trump-was-demanding-blacks-and-jews-be-allowed-to-play-at-his-clubs

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pallidin said:

If Clinton wins, Trump will, for the next few months, whine about how the election was "rigged" 

If Trump wins, he will say nothing about election rigging, other than to say that it wasn't rigged enough for Clinton to win, and that the holy HE stopped it.

- Clinton's address to Congress...

My fellow Americans...

- Trump's address to Congress...

My sheeples...

 

.

pallidin -- I feel there is a disconnect regarding your attitude towards H.Clinton...and ISIS -

I remember how angry you were when all the stuff about ISIS chopping the heads off kidnapped westerners etc
was all over the news - I mean you were steaming with anger and wanting your country to do something about it -

Major funders of ISIS also give huge donations to the Clinton Foundation and billions of dollars worth of arms
are sold to Saudi Arabia - the only reason ISIS and other Islamic extremist groups has made the progress
it has, is because they have the hardware to do it - weapons, trucks funding etc - go figure ?

so I don't get why you are so down on Trump who is more focused on tackling ISIS rather than warmongering
against Russia -  like Clinton is..?

and how do you feel about Hillary Clinton's closeness to Huma Abedin who has family  connections to the
Muslim Brotherhood - if the email scandal and her husband doesn't bring her down Abedin will have an influential
position in government - should Clinton win -

 

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, bee said:

.

pallidin -- I feel there is a disconnect regarding your attitude towards H.Clinton...and ISIS -

I remember how angry you were when all the stuff about ISIS chopping the heads off kidnapped westerners etc
was all over the news - I mean you were steaming with anger and wanting your country to do something about it -

Major funders of ISIS also give huge donations to the Clinton Foundation and billions of dollars worth of arms
are sold to Saudi Arabia - the only reason ISIS and other Islamic extremist groups has made the progress
it has, is because they have the hardware to do it - weapons, trucks funding etc - go figure ?

so I don't get why you are so down on Trump who is more focused on tackling ISIS rather than warmongering
against Russia -  like Clinton is..?

and how do you feel about Hillary Clinton's closeness to Huma Abedin who has family  connections to the
Muslim Brotherhood - if the email scandal and her husband doesn't bring her down Abedin will have an influential
position in government - should Clinton win -

 

 

 

Yeah but we made it through Obama and look where he's gotten us..oh wait...spoke out of school again

Stupid stupid stupid!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Likely Guy said:

DJT is a racist.

I don't believe that's quite likely, Mr. Guy. Trump doesn't really seem down right racist in the sense like David Duke racist. But on the other hand I couldn't disagree with you if you were to say he was bigoted and prejudice. Now those two words fit him quite nicely. But then those two words would fit most people in the world including myself for one reason or another. For instance - I'm admittedly biased against pink panthers. The gall of some people to color panthers pink is abhorrently disturbing to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, skliss said:

I'm disappointed in Assange and Anonymous. Where are all these promised revelations?

On one hand Im disappointed thus far as well. On the other its pretty sad that what HAS been released hasnt been enough for America to say ENOUGH and remove this woman for consideration for president. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"On one hand Im disappointed thus far as well. On the other its pretty sad that what HAS been released hasnt been enough for America to say ENOUGH and remove this woman for consideration for president. "

Don't forget the enormous amount of help she's had from just about every media outlet, celebrity, and justice department flunkey, not to mention FBi fact ignoring. Plus, up until recently, she's given no real interview, was given debate questions ahead of time, etc. No candidate ever has been so secluded and yet given more positive publicity than her.

(Quote button working sporadically for me, still)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, hellwyr said:

lets hope she wins. Otherwise, the US will socially go back 100 years.

Not really, 100 years ago (1916) the United States was not a Socialist Oligarchy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, hellwyr said:

lets hope she wins. Otherwise, the US will socially go back 100 years.

...you know she doesn't support gay marriage? Did you know that her husband while in Office signed the "Defense of Marriage" Act prohibiting same-sex couples from getting married?

Please inform yourself before you vote, if you haven't already. She's not who you want her to be.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dark_Grey said:

...you know she doesn't support gay marriage? Did you know that her husband while in Office signed the "Defense of Marriage" Act prohibiting same-sex couples from getting married?

Please inform yourself before you vote, if you haven't already. She's not who you want her to be.

Thats one of the maddening things about Hillary (and this entire election). Somehow shes defined as a liberal by both her supporters and her detractors , yet she really really isnt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pity you in the US with the dire two candidates to choose from to run your country.

I feel your pain as we have a complete political mess in the UK after our referendum that nobody has the power  or balls to execute.

Our 'special relationship' equates to us both now having useless rulers.

Edited by skookum
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Dark_Grey said:

...you know she doesn't support gay marriage? Did you know that her husband while in Office signed the "Defense of Marriage" Act prohibiting same-sex couples from getting married?

Please inform yourself before you vote, if you haven't already. She's not who you want her to be.

Her husband is not the same person as her. Also, I don't care because she is supporting it now (as the head of her party). Maybe personally she doesn't like gay mariage (propably since she is a Christian), but as long as she officially supports it all is well. The same goes for other topics. Anyway I have absolutely nothing to say to anyone who prefers Trump over Hillary.

Anyway we know more tomorrow.

Edited by hellwyr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, hellwyr said:

Her husband is not the same person as her. Also, I don't care because she is supporting it now (as the head of her party). Maybe personally she doesn't like gay mariage (propably since she is a Christian), but as long as she officially supports it all is well. The same goes for other topics. Anyway I have absolutely nothing to say to anyone who prefers Trump over Hillary.

Anyway we know more tomorrow.

Completely irrelevant anyway.  Gay marriage is legal.  Abortion, also a non-issue because it's legal.  none of this is going to change regardless of who is president.  The only reason these two dead horses are still being beat is to ensure that votes are based in fear instead of fact base.  The fact is that either mainstream candidate is unworthy of the position and our government is thoroughly corrupt but people voting with that in mind would change the power structure away from wealthy oligarchs and toward the people.  Can't have that so they keep us in constant fear.  Fear of Trump, fear of Clinton, fear of drugs, fear of terrorism, fear of the economy, fear of pedophiles, fear of guns, fear of the police, fear of not the police, fear of etc, etc. , etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Farmer77 said:

Thats one of the maddening things about Hillary (and this entire election). Somehow shes defined as a liberal by both her supporters and her detractors , yet she really really isnt. 

I get the young ones here who want to believe that Clinton is what she SAYS she is. Those of us with a few more years in our dish are well aware of the shady dealings, broken promises, the total destruction of those who oppose them and the lie after lie that are the true legacy of the arrogant, controlling and above the law Clintons.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Farmer77 said:

Thats one of the maddening things about Hillary (and this entire election). Somehow shes defined as a liberal by both her supporters and her detractors , yet she really really isnt. 

And take it from me, Mrs Clinton's not a conservative either.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it is we, the Clinton detractors, disbelievers, who got it wrong this election?  May be there isn’t a single email that links HRC to: ISIS militants (e.g., Saudi Arabia and Qatar), Clinton Foundation skulduggery, or any type of quid pro quo.  Sure, there might be a classified email or two, or three, that found their way onto unsecured servers; but all in all, HRC really didn’t mean anything nefarious in that.  HRC’s predecessors said it was "all good" and with no Inspector General, how was she to know?  I mean, we can’t expect her to go to any training about how to deal with classified material like everyone else.  It’s really our fault for putting those high expectations on her.  Hell, perhaps the 30,000 deleted emails were really about her daughter’s wedding and yoga…  I mean it is her only daughter and I’m sure she was all giddy inside about it and who doesn’t have at least 10-20,000 emails about yoga?  I mean those pants are nirvana themselves and deserve at least 5,000 emails about them.  All the other leaked emails, e.g., from Podesta, do not reflect HRC’s views, do not garner insight into her bad character, and definitely don’t reflect what HRC stands for or believes.  They weren’t her emails…  right?  And the media, it’s our skewed sense of reality and delusional hysteria that convinced us they were gaslighting the public – when in reality they were the ones really reporting the facts, unbiased, fairly, and honestly.  Moreover, it is us, i.e., Clinton detractors, disbelievers, who cannot comprehend the truth: that all this information about HRC was an elaborate hoax designed by the Russians and executed by the FBI and Julian Assange to upend the U.S. election and implant a puppet President (i.e., Trump) – it’s a deception perpetrated by Assange and his minions even to this day; and we should have listened to the DoJ and Obuma all along.  Shame on us!  That in fact HRC is the victim in all of this and justly deserves the White House; perhaps even more...  dictatorship... for the way we treated her.


- Nah! :P

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.