Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

May's brexit speech


spartan max2
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Captain Risky said:

BOLDED: Really stevewinn? I haven't done or said a thing other than post a link from a very well respected university. The source is Oxford University. Surely you're not suggesting that Oxford professors Sir David Hendry, Professor Doyne Farmer and Dr Max Roser are not impartial and have got it wrong... truth is they make no predictions, hold a position or cast's blame on anyone. Rather they have used historical facts to ascertain the truth.

Show me your fount of knowledge... you never do. But you feel you can attack my sources. That's not how it works, mate. I guess you're afraid to just admit that the Daily Mail and the Express is where you get all your twisted ideas. Perhaps if you want your views to be taken seriously you might need to consider more reputable reading material. Citing sources is the only way for your views to be distinguished from wishful thinking. 

 

 

Your damn right im calling them biased in their findings. Things to Consider.

INET Oxford is a non profit think tank established in 2012. which is linked to the INET think tank in New York. USA. established in 2009.

INET Oxford was set up to prevent future global financial crisis and saving the eurozone. INET has the same backer as INET New York (USA) no surprise there, So who is the backer or backers, The main founder is one George Soros does that name ring any bells? im sure it does. INET Oxford Receives £3.6Million pounds a year from George Soros in addition to this funding from George Soros - the Institute is supported for its research programmes from the Resolution Foundation, European Commission, Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), US Department of Energy, and the Rockefeller Foundation.

So lets recap. INET is a department based at Oxford university but not funded by. instead its funded by the Pro-EU Billionaire George Soros et'al, It receives funding from the European Union. So no biased or conflict of interest, how many people will cut off the hand that feeds them? 

but lets continue.... It took three of them to write that piece you quoted and they published it at their own institutes expense in 'The Times' News Paper. 17 days before the referendum vote - supporting the UK's membership of the European Union.

I've already been through it in my last post. and like i said then they are very selective in the figures they use which enables them to paint the picture of their choosing. - The fact they use Per-capita over GDP. Select the dates very carefully indeed. At least my post goes some way to balance it out.

My sources for my previous post come from personal knowledge in the sense remember key dates and/or events and internet based sources. (because if you cant link it, it cannot be true :rolleyes:

Encyclopaedia Britannica DVD-rom.

Books i've read on the History of the UK.

figures from..

OECD. https://data.oecd.org/united-kingdom.htm#profile-economy

http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/gbr/

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_the_United_Kingdom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_the_United_Kingdom#19th_century

Wiki links cross referenced with EBUK, if figures differ between the two, figures selected from EBUK for accuracy.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/gdp-growth

(Make sure you bookmark them for the future)

See when i reply to a post and spend time composing it the figures used within are not just plucked from thin air. I actually read a few sources then combined to give as accurate picture as possible. Why i bother taking the time replying to you in such detail is beyond me, but to be honest i do it for others in the main, because i know its wasted on yourself. because whenever i reply to you -  I can never get a coherent reply

Above is what i do below is what you do.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=brexit+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=x8-NWK-9B8ibgAbQgK-wDw#q=brexit&tbm=nws

Im thinking for myself, you sir just post editorial / journalistic opinion from the independent, guardian etc.. and worse treat it as gospel, and even worse still you go in to bat for it. :lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by stevewinn
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
19 minutes ago, stevewinn said:

Your damn right im calling them biased in their findings. Things to Consider.

INET Oxford is a non profit think tank established in 2012. which is linked to the INET think tank in New York. USA. established in 2009.

INET Oxford was set up to prevent future global financial crisis and saving the eurozone. INET has the same backer as INET New York (USA) no surprise there, So who is the backer or backers, The main founder is one George Soros does that name ring any bells? im sure it does. INET Oxford Receives £3.6Million pounds a year from George Soros in addition to this funding from George Soros - the Institute is supported for its research programmes from the Resolution Foundation, European Commission, Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), US Department of Energy, and the Rockefeller Foundation.

So lets recap. INET is a department based at Oxford university but not funded by. instead its funded by the Pro-EU Billionaire George Soros et'al, It receives funding from the European Union. So no biased or conflict of interest, how many people will cut off the hand that feeds them? 

but lets continue.... It took three of them to write that piece you quoted and they published it at their own institutes expense in 'The Times' News Paper. 17 days before the referendum vote - supporting the UK's membership of the European Union.

I've already been through it in my last post. and like i said then they are very selective in the figures they use which enables them to paint the picture of their choosing. - The fact they use Per-capita over GDP. Select the dates very carefully indeed. At least my post goes some way to balance it out.

My sources for my previous post come from personal knowledge in the sense remember key dates and/or events and internet based sources. (because if you cant link it, it cannot be true :rolleyes:

Encyclopaedia Britannica DVD-rom.

Books i've read on the History of the UK.

figures from..

OECD. https://data.oecd.org/united-kingdom.htm#profile-economy

http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/gbr/

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_the_United_Kingdom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_the_United_Kingdom#19th_century

Wiki links cross referenced with EBUK, if figures differ between the two, figures selected from EBUK for accuracy.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/gdp-growth

(Make sure you bookmark them for the future)

See when i reply to a post and spend time composing it the figures used within are not just plucked from thin air. I actually read a few sources then combined to give as accurate picture as possible. Why i bother taking the time replying to you in such detail is beyond me, but to be honest i do it for others in the main, because i know its wasted on yourself. because whenever i reply to you -  I can never get a coherent reply

Above is what i do below is what you do.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=brexit+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=x8-NWK-9B8ibgAbQgK-wDw#q=brexit&tbm=nws

Im thinking for myself, you sir just post editorial / journalistic opinion from the independent, guardian etc.. and worse treat it as gospel, and even worse still you go in to bat for it. :lol:

Possibly a childish and smug meme isn't the way to endorse such a fine post, but seeing Risky receive such a quality dressing down, I can only tip my hat to you steve :nw:

giphy.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What, that someone has taken the time and trouble to respond to your prejudices and assumptions and highly selective news reports from carefully selected websites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.