Protesting for what?

[+Hammerclaw]

Jeez people. I think you ought to sit down calmly, take a  stress pill and think things over.                                 

          https://youtu.be/7v7j-Y0YU5Q

 

[Stubbly_Dooright]

Quote

Thorvir:  Hey, the left has....well, the left.  The right has Ellapannella.  I think things have a kharmic balance at this time.

    I guess................................................

 

[+Hammerclaw]

26 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

    I guess................................................

 

I think they'd make a beautiful couple. They already argue like they're married.

 

[Stubbly_Dooright]

3 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

I think they'd make a beautiful couple. They already argue like they're married.

 

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...............   

Wait?! 

What?!  

[+Hammerclaw]

9 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...............   

Wait?! 

What?!  

Who better than an understanding spouse with whom to blow of steam?

[Jarocal]

53 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

Who better than an understanding spouse with whom to blow of steam?

One who knows to have a nice meal, cold drink waiting, and the housework done for her when she gets home from work. Random gifting of flower bouquets and boxes of chocolates to show apprecitation are generelly well received...

[Stubbly_Dooright]

1 hour ago, Hammerclaw said:

Who better than an understanding spouse with whom to blow of steam?

Ahhhhh......................... I think I get it.  

The one's closest are usually the ones to receive the epicenter of the explosion I guess. *shrugs* 

[Stubbly_Dooright]

12 minutes ago, Jarocal said:

One who knows to have a nice meal, cold drink waiting, and the housework done for her when she gets home from work. Random gifting of flower bouquets and boxes of chocolates to show apprecitation are generelly well received...

 

Maybe.........................

 

[+Hammerclaw]

36 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Ahhhhh......................... I think I get it.  

The one's closest are usually the ones to receive the epicenter of the explosion I guess. *shrugs* 

No. Two people living in close proximity, even a "loving couple" will drive each other up the wall, from time to time. The effects of cabin fever may be quite severe. If they can't vent without tearing their relationship apart, it's doomed. Successful long term relations are, usually, two people who have mastered the art of arguing. It can become quite ritualistic, with unspoken boundaries never crossed. Real love tempers the discussion.  

Edited January 29, 2017 by Hammerclaw

[Thorvir]

27 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

No. Two people living in close proximity, even a "loving couple" will drive each other up the wall, from time to time. The effects of cabin fever may be quite severe. If they can't vent without tearing their relationship apart, it's doomed. Successful long term relations are, usually, two people who have mastered the art of arguing. It can become quite ritualistic, with unspoken boundaries never crossed. Real love tempers the discussion.  

That because too much of anything, even a good thing, isn't a good thing.  Except for salted cashews.

[+Hammerclaw]

2 minutes ago, Thorvir said:

That because too much of anything, even a good thing, isn't a good thing.  Except for salted cashews.

Or Spanish Peanuts.

[Jarocal]

11 minutes ago, Thorvir said:

That because too much of anything, even a good thing, isn't a good thing.  Except for salted cashews.

Or a happy wife...

[GlitterRose]

On 1/25/2017 at 10:46 AM, AdealJustice said:

That's the single biggest thing I have against em.. the Epstein affair. Note ... NO ONE and I mean not a single major mainstream outlet talked about that topic during the campaign etc. Note the Ceo of NY times is a known pedo protector since the BBC times with Saville...

The media actually has to be careful what they print. If there's no evidence that someone is involved in something like that...news outlets can't say so. They can be sued. 

I do remember reading some stuff about Trump and his family having ties to Epstein, as well. Seems like a whole lot of politicians were very interested in his wallet. Regardless of what a weasel he is, his money is the same color, and politicians need a lot of money to run. 

[GlitterRose]

On 1/27/2017 at 7:12 AM, Sweetpumper said:

Muslim Women’s March Organizer Attacks Female Genital Mutilation Survivor Hirsi Ali: I Would Take Her ‘Vagina Away’

Sarsour is the same woman who tweeted one of the most vile attacks on a woman in the history of Twitter

http://www.infowars.com/muslim-womens-march-organizer-attacks-female-genital-mutilation-survivor-hirsi-ali-i-would-take-her-vagina-away/

 

Idiots.

Says the person using infowars as a "source." 

Oh, the irony. 

[Jarocal]

8 minutes ago, ChaosRose said:

The media actually has to be careful what they print. If there's no evidence that someone is involved in something like that...news outlets can't say so. They can be sued. 

I do remember reading some stuff about Trump and his family having ties to Epstein, as well. Seems like a whole lot of politicians were very interested in his wallet. Regardless of what a weasel he is, his money is the same color, and politicians need a lot of money to run. 

I believe that MSM allusions to Trumps possible connections while remaining silent on Clinton's showed a hypocritical biase on their part is what the other poster was attempting to convey. At least that is what I understood from the post.

[GlitterRose]

Just now, Jarocal said:

I believe that MSM allusions to Trumps possible connections while remaining silent on Clinton's showed a hypocritical biase on their part is what the other poster was attempting to convey. At least that is what I understood from the post.

It wasn't MSM that alluded to Trump. At least not what I read.

[Farmer77]

2 minutes ago, Jarocal said:

I believe that MSM allusions to Trumps possible connections while remaining silent on Clinton's showed a hypocritical biase on their part is what the other poster was attempting to convey. At least that is what I understood from the post.

Noone wanted to touch the Epstein story , including the MSM. There was disturbingly minimal coverage of both candidates relationships with Epstein. 

[GlitterRose]

10 minutes ago, Farmer77 said:

Noone wanted to touch the Epstein story , including the MSM. There was disturbingly minimal coverage of both candidates relationships with Epstein. 

Well, is it disturbing when there's really no evidence anyone did anything wrong? 

Again, news outlets have to be careful. They can't just arbitrarily say people are pedophiles. And we should be glad that they can't. 

There is no guilt by association. 

Edited January 29, 2017 by ChaosRose

[Farmer77]

3 minutes ago, ChaosRose said:

Well, is it disturbing when there's really no evidence anyone did anything wrong? 

Again, news outlets have to be careful. They can't just arbitrarily say people are pedophiles. And we should be glad that they can't. 

Hanging out with a known and unrepentant pedophile is wrong.

Visiting the private island where he keeps his sex slaves is wrong.

In my opinion the two sentences above stand on their own regardless of their personal actions while hanging with said pedophile. 

Edited January 29, 2017 by Farmer77

[Farmer77]

5 minutes ago, ChaosRose said:

There is no guilt by association. 

Maybe not guilt but it certainly speaks mountains to the character of someone who would consider a pedophile a friend. 

[GlitterRose]

4 minutes ago, Farmer77 said:

Hanging out with a known and unrepentant pedophile is wrong.

Visiting the private island where he keeps his sex slaves is wrong.

In my opinion the two sentences above stand on their own regardless of their personal actions while hanging with said pedophile. 

Again, I think both sides woo whatever millionaires and billionaires they can. And that's because of our current system. 

[Farmer77]

Just now, ChaosRose said:

Again, I think both sides woo whatever millionaires and billionaires they can. And that's because of our current system. 

Youre right but that still makes both sides immoral scumbags in my opinion. 

[bee]

7 minutes ago, ChaosRose said:

Well, is it disturbing when there's really no evidence anyone did anything wrong? 

Again, news outlets have to be careful. They can't just arbitrarily say people are pedophiles. And we should be glad that they can't. 

.

only recently CNN living up to their reputation for fake news nearly got sued for referring to Julian Assange as a pedophile and
had to make a retraction -

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-07/we-regret-error-cnn-apologizes-assange-pedophilia-accusation-issues-retraction

It didn't take much for CNN to fold after Wikileaks threatened to sue it for defamation.

As reported on Wednesday, the whistleblowing organization threatened to sue CNN after the biased, pro-Clinton news organization aired an interview with Phil Mudd, in which the paid analyst and ex-Deputy-Director of the CIA called Julian Assange a pedophile. CNN’s counterterrorism "analyst" made the on-air statement on Wednesday while discussing WikiLeaks. Mudd boldly declared that “there's an effort to protect WikiLeaks (and) a pedophile who lives in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.”

Shortly after the lawsuit threat, CNN promptly apologized for the segment and conceded that “CNN has no evidence to support that assertion."

.

[Farmer77]

6 minutes ago, bee said:

.

only recently CNN living up to their reputation for fake news nearly got sued for referring to Julian Assange as a pedophile and
had to make a retraction -

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-07/we-regret-error-cnn-apologizes-assange-pedophilia-accusation-issues-retraction

 

 

Julian assange being maligned by CNN is a whole different story than the Epstein chronicles:

The ‘sex slave’ scandal that exposed pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein

Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein is accused of luring an underage girl into his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise under the guise of using his wealth and connections to get her into a prestige NYC college    this is a new one 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein

In 2005, the world was introduced to reclusive billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, friend to princes and an American president, a power broker with the darkest of secrets: He was also a pedophile, accused of recruiting dozens of underage girls into a sex-slave network, buying their silence and moving along, although he has been convicted of only one count of soliciting prostitution from a minor. Visitors to his private Caribbean island, known as “Orgy Island,” have included Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Stephen Hawking.

 

Edited January 29, 2017 by Farmer77

[MWoo7]

27 minutes ago, Farmer77 said:

Maybe not guilt but it certainly speaks mountains to the character of someone who would consider a pedophile a friend. 

Should educate them, give them help free housing , while in lockup make sure they get a few degrees so they can teach you know.  Bleeding hearts, oh let the ugliness come in by the hordes, I say yes and we'll naturally put a few in your house and backyard, ole rich biddy is like OH MY WORD ! HOW DARE YOU ! Jeffreys! Jeffreys TAKE CARE OF THIS THIS THIS, OUT OUT NOW ! OUT I SAY !