Parsec Posted February 2, 2017 #201 Share Posted February 2, 2017 1 minute ago, back to earth said: Not at all , Papa george has proved nothing . I have my own definition of 'psychic' ( but only when it works ) ; the unconscious goes about its hidden business of collating received info and impressions and then flashes the result to the conscious mind ... much like what some call 'intuition' - which itself seems most successful in areas where the person having the 'intuition' is most experienced ( eg. Nurses that show good 'intuition' seem to be the ones with the most nursing experience ) Yeah, I was kidding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harte Posted February 2, 2017 #202 Share Posted February 2, 2017 (edited) 5 hours ago, papageorge1 said: I might blow your mind by considering Akashic memory and spiritual memories that may be available to other entities. If you knew anything at all about the topic, you'd know that even if Atlantis existed, it wasn't named "Atlantis" because Plato tells us that Solon Hellenized all the names in the story (as an excuse for Greek name places in a supposedly Egyptian story.) So, since you seem to believe in the Akashic Record, and I assume from that that maybe you know something about that, you should know that nobody reading any Akashic record could ever come across any information concerning any place called "Atlantis" because that wouldn't have been the name of the place and the Akashic record doesn't lie (or does it?) You can therefore only conclude that any of your favorite psychics that read the Akashic records and claim knowledge of Atlantis from there are actually lying. There is literally NO other conclusion to be reached. Harte Edited February 2, 2017 by Harte 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #203 Share Posted February 2, 2017 10 minutes ago, Parsec said: Ah! Now I understand! We say the same things, but since you live upside-down, they look the opposite! Mystery solved! I do ? I thought we came from the same place ..... I was born in 'The Shire' . http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/about-town/shattering-the-shire-stereotype-20120625-20y4c.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harte Posted February 2, 2017 #204 Share Posted February 2, 2017 6 minutes ago, Jarocal said: They actually used to tether Greenland in place until it broke free and drifted north finally scuttling it its current location. What a load. Greenland didn't "drift." It daintily lifted its petticoat and gingerly minced across the Atlantic. For God's sake! How many times do I have to tell you people this? Harte 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #205 Share Posted February 2, 2017 13 minutes ago, Parsec said: Yeah, I was kidding I know . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted February 2, 2017 #206 Share Posted February 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Harte said: If you knew anything at all about the topic, you'd know that even if Atlantis existed, it wasn't named "Atlantis" because Plato tells us that Solon Hellenized all the names in the story (as an excuse for Greek name places in a supposedly Egyptian story.) So, since you seem to believe in the Akashic Record, and I assume from that that maybe you know something about that, you should know that nobody reading any Akashic record could ever come across any information concerning any place called "Atlantis" because that wouldn't have been the name of the place and the Akashic record doesn't lie (or does it?) You can therefore only conclude that any of your favorite psychics that read the Akashic records and claim knowledge of Atlantis from there are actually lying. There is literally NO other conclusion to be reached. Hare Actually there are other conclusions I can reach. Posting such in the only way I could with my limited (read base and profane) vocabulary articulate those conclusions would violate forum posting rules. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swede Posted February 2, 2017 #207 Share Posted February 2, 2017 (edited) 21 hours ago, papageorge1 said: I said I was intrigued by psychic archeology and consider it, but not not that anyone can 'validate' it to others. Incorrect. You recently stated the following: To the expected criticism here, I will say that I listen to psychic archeology too (emphasis added)(papageorge1 #31). There is a distinct difference between "considering" and "listening to". Nor have you validated/legitimized the "concept" of "psychic archaeology". And citing such luminary researchers (!) as a "channeled" "Archangel Metatron" does little to support your own credibility or that of your sources. Edit: Clarification. Edited February 2, 2017 by Swede 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #208 Share Posted February 2, 2017 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Harte said: If you knew anything at all about the topic, you'd know that even if Atlantis existed, it wasn't named "Atlantis" because Plato tells us that Solon Hellenized all the names in the story (as an excuse for Greek name places in a supposedly Egyptian story.) So, since you seem to believe in the Akashic Record, and I assume from that that maybe you know something about that, you should know that nobody reading any Akashic record could ever come across any information concerning any place called "Atlantis" because that wouldn't have been the name of the place and the Akashic record doesn't lie (or does it?) You can therefore only conclude that any of your favorite psychics that read the Akashic records and claim knowledge of Atlantis from there are actually lying. There is literally NO other conclusion to be reached. Hare Papa is having a day off , I said i would stand in for him ..... <ahem> So many people have used the term Atlantis that the Akasick Record ( ) has been adapted accordingly . It gets updated, just like Mirriam - Webster does every so often . To go further into this, we broach the subject of ...... wait for it ..... Psychic Egyptology http://wisdom-magazine.com/Article.aspx/2967/ Edited February 2, 2017 by back to earth 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swede Posted February 2, 2017 #209 Share Posted February 2, 2017 10 hours ago, Jarocal said: If I possessed the eloquence with communication as you do sir, perhaps I may have etched out a career putting words to paper rather than one requiring utilization of heavy blunt objects being struck on rocks and stacking those in a pile. Being a simple minded, undereducated person I struggle to comprehend some areas such as the paranormal, the psychic phenomena, and advanced ancient technology which disappears without a trace. Instead my feeble mind reverts to examining solutions I may employ with skills and attributes I posses... Chuckle! It would appear that in this case even the skilled and artfully applied utilization of blunt objects may be insufficient in achieving the enlightenment so desperately needed. . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #210 Share Posted February 2, 2017 11 minutes ago, Swede said: Incorrect. You recently stated the following: To the expected criticism here, I will say that I listen to psychic archeology too (emphasis added)(papageorge1 #31). There is a distinct difference between "considering" and "listening to". Nor have you validated/legitimized the "concept" of "psychic archaeology". And citing such luminary researchers (!) as "Archangel Metatron" does little to support your own credibility or that of your sources. . Ommmmmmm < uses psychic powers > .... P G is going to say that, the statement he made before that had considering in it (re ancient civilisations ) and the follow on comment about 'listening' to psychic archaeology , is a follow on (if my memory serves me correctly on what he wrote ) . ... a bit like his ' I never said they spread their technology around the world ' ...... apparently he picks and chooses from the New Age Atlantis ideas as it suits him ? Unless he has his own view into the ' Astral record ' . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsec Posted February 2, 2017 #211 Share Posted February 2, 2017 15 minutes ago, back to earth said: I do ? I thought we came from the same place ..... I was born in 'The Shire' . http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/about-town/shattering-the-shire-stereotype-20120625-20y4c.html Jokes aside, as you of course already know, I was referring to the piece of land Tolkien used to build his idea of Shire on. I reckon it's sunnier there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Duck Posted February 2, 2017 #212 Share Posted February 2, 2017 26 minutes ago, back to earth said: Not at all , Papa george has proved nothing . I have my own definition of 'psychic' ( but only when it works ) ; the unconscious goes about its hidden business of collating received info and impressions and then flashes the result to the conscious mind ... much like what some call 'intuition' - which itself seems most successful in areas where the person having the 'intuition' is most experienced ( eg. Nurses that show good 'intuition' seem to be the ones with the most nursing experience ) Unconcious competence 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #213 Share Posted February 2, 2017 5 minutes ago, Swede said: Chuckle! It would appear that in this case even the skilled and artfully applied utilization of blunt objects may be insufficient in achieving the enlightenment so desperately needed. . Mmmmmm ... thats one way . Another is to use sharp objects , instead of 'encouraging ' some 'good sense into ' with a blunt object , we could let some 'bad sense out ' with a sharp object ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #214 Share Posted February 2, 2017 8 minutes ago, Parsec said: Jokes aside, as you of course already know, I was referring to the piece of land Tolkien used to build his idea of Shire on. I thought you were from 'the real' one ? 8 minutes ago, Parsec said: I reckon it's sunnier there. Sunnier in New Zealand than the south Sydney subs ? Pshaw ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted February 2, 2017 #215 Share Posted February 2, 2017 5 minutes ago, Swede said: Chuckle! It would appear that in this case even the skilled and artfully applied utilization of blunt objects may be insufficient in achieving the enlightenment so desperately needed. . Which is why I advocate "soft debate" (5 kilos wet sand tied into the end of a sock) rather than hard blunt objects when reasoning with some people. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #216 Share Posted February 2, 2017 12 minutes ago, Golden Duck said: Unconcious competence Mine is very competent , actually, it runs most of the show . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted February 2, 2017 #217 Share Posted February 2, 2017 7 minutes ago, back to earth said: Mmmmmm ... thats one way . Another is to use sharp objects , instead of 'encouraging ' some 'good sense into ' with a blunt object , we could let some 'bad sense out ' with a sharp object ? Debridement of dead brain cells in a similar manner to removal of gangrenous flesh. I find that an interesting concept. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsec Posted February 2, 2017 #218 Share Posted February 2, 2017 5 minutes ago, back to earth said: I thought you were from 'the real' one ? Sunnier in New Zealand than the south Sydney subs ? Pshaw ! Well no, I'm not from any Shire anyway, it's only where I live at the moment. I meant that this is actually the "real" Shire, because it's the place Tolkien draw inspiration from, when he wrote about his Middle-Earth's Shire. Too convoluted. Well, I don't know about the sun, but for sure you have some very interesting full moons there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #219 Share Posted February 2, 2017 13 minutes ago, Jarocal said: Debridement of dead brain cells in a similar manner to removal of gangrenous flesh. I find that an interesting concept. yes, it seems Pink Floyd did too ; " ..... But it was only a fantasy The wall was too high as you can see No matter how he tried he could not break free And the worms ate into his brain. .... " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back to earth Posted February 2, 2017 #220 Share Posted February 2, 2017 8 minutes ago, Parsec said: Well no, I'm not from any Shire anyway, it's only where I live at the moment. I meant that this is actually the "real" Shire, because it's the place Tolkien draw inspiration from, when he wrote about his Middle-Earth's Shire. Too convoluted. Well, I don't know about the sun, but for sure you have some very interesting full moons there! Van Morrison agrees about that " Its a lovely night for a Moontan ..... " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted February 2, 2017 #221 Share Posted February 2, 2017 13 minutes ago, Parsec said: Well, I don't know about the sun, but for sure you have some very interesting full moons there! Actually I see "waxing gibbous" moons 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsec Posted February 2, 2017 #222 Share Posted February 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, Jarocal said: Actually I see "waxing gibbous" moons Evidently we don't share the same psychic powers. Mh, I just realise that if I'd be able to perform remote viewing, I'd probably be a perv. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted February 2, 2017 #223 Share Posted February 2, 2017 3 hours ago, back to earth said: Okay, thats fair enough. But how do you discern what is the truth and what is imagination ... what is your yardstick ? Often it is not discernable with certainty. I have to form my personal opinion of likelihood based on all my past knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted February 2, 2017 #224 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Just now, papageorge1 said: Often it is not discernable with certainty. I have to form my personal opinion of likelihood based on all my past knowledge. Please offer three names of psychics who have helped form this opinion and three things upon which they agree. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badeskov Posted February 2, 2017 #225 Share Posted February 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said: Please offer three names of psychics who have helped form this opinion and three things upon which they agree. By all means of respect, but he cannot. That much is painfully obvious. Cheers, Badeskov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts