Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Kellyanne Conway


ellapenella

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Likely Guy said:

Meanwhile back at the ranch:

"Ethics lawyers and liberal activists excoriated White House counselor Kellyanne Conway after she gave a “free commercial” for Ivanka Trump’s clothing line, an apparent violation of a federal rule that bars public officials from using their positions to promote private business interests.

But enforcing that rule will be left up to the White House itself — or a federal agency that has traditionally shown little interest in launching investigations, legal specialists said.

Conway’s unusual product endorsement from the White House briefing room came in response to reports that retailers, including Nordstrom Inc., have been dropping Ivanka Trump’s apparel due to lack of sales.

“It’s a wonderful line. I own some of it,” Conway said during an interview on Fox News Channel’s Fox & Friends program. “I’m going to give it a free commercial here. Go buy it today everybody; you can find it online.”

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/world/98go+today+kellyanne+conway+98free+commercial+ivanka+trump+line/12882676/story.html?google_editors_picks=true

 

 

Looks like she was counseled for it.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Likely Guy said:

I'm sure her wrist is still smarting.

Would this be sufficient?

giphy.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I haven't read the whole post, all I had to see was the name. I love the comedy that's happening down there (USA). This woman and your president is the greatest comedy show on earth at the moment. "Alternative Facts" seriously that is the funniest thing I've heard in years and to see people defending her is hilarious. If this continues on this way for the next 4 years the outtakes well be great. On a serious note though if this S#%t show continues we're all in trouble.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sweetpumper said:

Well, I'll give you a :tu: for all your links. You know, I love them links. But seriously now, I'm trying to remember, are we trying to prove that there is a growing number of Muslim's causing terrorist activities?Or are we trying to prove that the media is down playing it over there? Seriously, would you be able to point it out to me in some of the links. Not saying it's not there, I just can't seem to pinpoint it at first glanced.

 A lot of the links have different topics, from what I can see with most of them. Some of the seem to talk about the over population of them. I don't think that is necessarily meaning they are a terrorist risk, does it? And yeah, I think discussing the horrors of female genital mutilation should be shown, but I have felt it's not just Muslims. Is it just Muslims countries too?

Now here's something, This link you provided.  It says that Muslims want to force Sharia law, but I'm getting from the article that they are just buying up land. Did I miss something in the article? 

Quote

The official urged citizens to avoid prejudice toward all people who attend mosques established by Salafists. The fact that the mosques are controlled by Islamists “does not mean that people who go there are necessarily being indoctrinated [into and becoming extremists],” the head of the regional BfV department said.

Just wondering................. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, .ZZ. said:

Would this be sufficient?

giphy.gif

Too extreme. She's deserving of a "You're fired!", but not kind of 'firing'.

Edited by Likely Guy
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Well, I'll give you a :tu: for all your links. You know, I love them links. But seriously now, I'm trying to remember, are we trying to prove that there is a growing number of Muslim's causing terrorist activities?Or are we trying to prove that the media is down playing it over there? Seriously, would you be able to point it out to me in some of the links. Not saying it's not there, I just can't seem to pinpoint it at first glanced.

 A lot of the links have different topics, from what I can see with most of them. Some of the seem to talk about the over population of them. I don't think that is necessarily meaning they are a terrorist risk, does it? And yeah, I think discussing the horrors of female genital mutilation should be shown, but I have felt it's not just Muslims. Is it just Muslims countries too?

Now here's something, This link you provided.  It says that Muslims want to force Sharia law, but I'm getting from the article that they are just buying up land. Did I miss something in the article? 

Just wondering................. :) 

You... you read the links not just the headlines???

Well that's just not playing fair!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three minute documentary clip shows the ill-effects of recent muslim immigration into Germany; muslim boys brazenly speak of contempt for native-born Germans, promising they'll make their best efforts to create chaos and contribute nothing.

Edited by Ellapennella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Well, I'll give you a :tu: for all your links. You know, I love them links. But seriously now, I'm trying to remember, are we trying to prove that there is a growing number of Muslim's causing terrorist activities?Or are we trying to prove that the media is down playing it over there? Seriously, would you be able to point it out to me in some of the links. Not saying it's not there, I just can't seem to pinpoint it at first glanced.

 A lot of the links have different topics, from what I can see with most of them. Some of the seem to talk about the over population of them. I don't think that is necessarily meaning they are a terrorist risk, does it? And yeah, I think discussing the horrors of female genital mutilation should be shown, but I have felt it's not just Muslims. Is it just Muslims countries too?

Now here's something, This link you provided.  It says that Muslims want to force Sharia law, but I'm getting from the article that they are just buying up land. Did I miss something in the article? 

Just wondering................. :) 

I'm not wondering, I know what's at risk.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ellapennella said:

Three minute documentary clip shows the ill-effects of recent muslim immigration into Germany; muslim boys brazenly speak of contempt for native-born Germans, promising they'll make their best efforts to create chaos and contribute nothing.

'ill-effects of recent muslim immigration'?

1. There is nothing in the video about muslim immigrants. Could you be assuming that perhaps based on nothing but skin colour?

2. And best of all, the video was uploaded in 2011. The events are at least 6 years old. That's before the migrant crisis. So probably not hugely relevant to the conversation.

3. As for the things you see and hear in the video, come take a visit to the rougher parts of the North East. Almost no immigrants in these communities and you'll see and hear the same things. It's a product of the socio-economic situation, not people's ancestry.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Setton said:

'ill-effects of recent muslim immigration'?

1. There is nothing in the video about muslim immigrants. Could you be assuming that perhaps based on nothing but skin colour?

2. And best of all, the video was uploaded in 2011. The events are at least 6 years old. That's before the migrant crisis. So probably not hugely relevant to the conversation.

3. As for the things you see and hear in the video, come take a visit to the rougher parts of the North East. Almost no immigrants in these communities and you'll see and hear the same things. It's a product of the socio-economic situation, not people's ancestry.

I got it , you are a supporter of terrorist, not I. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ellapennella said:

I got it , you are a supporter of terrorist, not I. 

Are you illiterate or trolling? There's absolutely nothing in anything I've said to suggest that.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Setton said:

Are you illiterate or trolling? There's absolutely nothing in anything I've said to suggest that.

In your eyes , probably. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ellapennella said:

In your eyes , probably. 

So you've no response to being caught out in a lie so you just claim everyone else is a supporter of terrorism. No wonder you're a supporter of Conway. You're a disgrace.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Setton said:

You... you read the links not just the headlines???

Well that's just not playing fair!

But?!  But?! But?!

lfL0UvH.gif

My bad! I just assumed because that there were.......................................................... 

shrug-house.gif

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ellapennella said:

I'm not wondering, I know what's at risk.

 

Good for you! You were able to. I don't doubt this. I remember seeing this sometime ago. So, I'm wondering though, and this is a question for you and everyone else here, is this more of a small amount of them doing that, or a bigger thing that I thought was implied in Sweet Pumper's post? Again, I could be wrong, if I did missed something reading the links. 

Now, though, if this is a small group, well there are things like that in all beliefs groups and in those who are Atheists. Would you place door to door groups, like the Watch Tower people, JW's, and various Babtists, as taking over America? Seeing the video, it kinds of reminds me of the other group's behavior. Well, heck, even at retail establishments, various groups do this, and I do feel they are going against civil rights of individuals and business areas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Setton said:

So you've no response to being caught out in a lie so you just claim everyone else is a supporter of terrorism. No wonder you're a supporter of Conway. You're a disgrace.

 Why should I bother answering you anymore? you seem to believe that there is no need for concern. 

I have my President who I trust, I don't care what you think about me. 

Edited by Ellapennella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Ellapennella said:
Quote
  55 minutes ago, Setton said:

'ill-effects of recent muslim immigration'?

1. There is nothing in the video about muslim immigrants. Could you be assuming that perhaps based on nothing but skin colour?

2. And best of all, the video was uploaded in 2011. The events are at least 6 years old. That's before the migrant crisis. So probably not hugely relevant to the conversation.

3. As for the things you see and hear in the video, come take a visit to the rougher parts of the North East. Almost no immigrants in these communities and you'll see and hear the same things. It's a product of the socio-economic situation, not people's ancestry.

I got it , you are a supporter of terrorist, not I. 

Chris-Farley-Sunglasses-Flip-Shock.gif

Excuse me?!?! How do you get that, (from Setton's post) to label someone like that? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Good for you! You were able to. I don't doubt this. I remember seeing this sometime ago. So, I'm wondering though, and this is a question for you and everyone else here, is this more of a small amount of them doing that, or a bigger thing that I thought was implied in Sweet Pumper's post? Again, I could be wrong, if I did missed something reading the links. 

Now, though, if this is a small group, well there are things like that in all beliefs groups and in those who are Atheists. Would you place door to door groups, like the Watch Tower people, JW's, and various Babtists, as taking over America? Seeing the video, it kinds of reminds me of the other group's behavior. Well, heck, even at retail establishments, various groups do this, and I do feel they are going against civil rights of individuals and business areas. 

the left are delusional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ellapennella said:

 Why should I bother answering you anymore? you seem to believe that there is no need for concern. 

I have my President who I trust, I don't care what you think about me. 

'Answering anymore'? You've not managed to answer anything yet.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Chris-Farley-Sunglasses-Flip-Shock.gif

Excuse me?!?! How do you get that, (from Setton's post) to label someone like that? 

Clearly anyone that is delusion and does not see a danger is an enabler, supporter,unknowingly?maybe knowingly for some?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ellapennella said:
Quote
13 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Good for you! You were able to. I don't doubt this. I remember seeing this sometime ago. So, I'm wondering though, and this is a question for you and everyone else here, is this more of a small amount of them doing that, or a bigger thing that I thought was implied in Sweet Pumper's post? Again, I could be wrong, if I did missed something reading the links. 

Now, though, if this is a small group, well there are things like that in all beliefs groups and in those who are Atheists. Would you place door to door groups, like the Watch Tower people, JW's, and various Babtists, as taking over America? Seeing the video, it kinds of reminds me of the other group's behavior. Well, heck, even at retail establishments, various groups do this, and I do feel they are going against civil rights of individuals and business areas. 

the left are delusional. 

GIF-jaw-drop-Sarah-Jessica-Parker-Sex-an

First, how is your reply a credible answer to my question I asked you? You know, the one you bolded to reply to? You want to try again? 

Two, just lumping one group as one thing, and as an insult as well? Seriously?! Where's your basis that you can lump sum one group as all behaving that and that they are that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ellapennella said:

Clearly anyone that is delusion and does not see a danger is an enabler, supporter,unknowingly?maybe knowingly for some?

Seriously?!?! If this was used in various places in reality, do you think it would be taken seriously? I'm sorry, but I cannot find your answers as being understandable to the points and the questions asked in the last couple of posts here. Why are you resorting to this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stubbly_Dooright said:

 

First, how is your reply a credible answer to my question I asked you? You know, the one you bolded to reply to? You want to try again? 

Two, just lumping one group as one thing, and as an insult as well? Seriously?! Where's your basis that you can lump sum one group as all behaving that and that they are that? 

You're trying to make this a religious thing when it's a National Security issue. So forgive me if I don't reply to your nonsense any longer. I don't mean to be rude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Seriously?!?! If this was used in various places in reality, do you think it would be taken seriously? I'm sorry, but I cannot find your answers as being understandable to the points and the questions asked in the last couple of posts here. Why are you resorting to this? 

as what, being what you want them to be...lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.