Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

New Fossil Carnivore discovered in Egypt


Still Waters

Recommended Posts

A new and very toothy fossil carnivore has just been discovered in Egypt, and corresponding research could help to explain why our early primate relatives tried to spend as much time as possible in trees.
 
The meat lover has been named Masrasector nananubis, after the canine-headed Egyptian god Anubis, who was associated with the afterlife. Unearthed at a site called “Locality 41” in Egypt’s Fayum Depression, located west of the Nile and south of Cairo, the new fossil is described in the journal PLOS ONE.

https://www.seeker.com/earth/animals/new-fossil-carnivore-may-explain-why-our-primate-relatives-stayed-in-trees

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Very interesting. But worth pointing out that that's 'carnivore' as in meat eater in this case, as opposed to 'carnivore' as in the order Carnivora, this was a Creodont. I like those. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting that they still refer it to the Creodonta, which has long been known as a polyphyletic wastebasket clade.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Carnivorfox said:

It is interesting that they still refer it to the Creodonta, which has long been known as a polyphyletic wastebasket clade.

I'm a few decades out with my kniwledge of this. What's the thinking now?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oldrover said:

I'm a few decades out with my kniwledge of this. What's the thinking now?

Currently the thought is that the Creodonta (which traditionally contains the clades Hyaenodontidae and Oxyaenidae) is polyphyletic, meaning that it contains genera that don't all share a common ancestor. The exact relationships of many of its members remains unclear, with the Creodonta sometimes serving as a grouping for many incertae sedis taxa. Extensive revision is needed to retain the validity of some of these clades (akin to Gauthier's redefining of Carnosauria and Coelurosauria within theropods).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks CF, so essentially it's a mess that needs sorting then? I do need to catch up with this as I say, I'm twenty years out of date. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.