Ozfactor Posted July 19, 2017 #1 Share Posted July 19, 2017 http://www.heraldsun.com.au/technology/science/kakadu-archaeological-discovery-proves-first-australians-arrived-at-least-65000-years-ago/news-story/316f7e4dadcc9d5dc2aa9ca5950ff773 NEW proof has been found showing Aboriginal people lived in Australia up to 18,000 years earlier than once thought, at the same time now-extinct species of giant animals roamed the land. A team of archaeologists have uncovered a treasure trove of evidence with global significance for the history of human evolution, confirming the colonisation of Australia at least 65,000 years ago. Findings from the excavation have this week been published in Nature magazine, and lead author Associate Professor Chris Clarkson says the new chronology places people in Australia more than 20,000 years before the continent-wide extinction of megafauna such as giant kangaroos and wombats. The site contains the oldest ground-edge stone axe technology in the world, the oldest known seed grinding tools in Australia and evidence of finely-made stone points which may have served as spear tips. Hundreds of thousands of unearthed artefacts from the dig also revealed strong Aboriginal cultural continuity, with huge quantities of ground ochre in a region known for its spectacular rock art. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieChecker Posted July 21, 2017 #2 Share Posted July 21, 2017 First thought that came to me... How do we know that these new older tools belonged to the Aborigines? Could they not have belonged to an earlier people? Is there indications that link this excavation to other later dated excavations? I'll read the article and see if they say. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozfactor Posted July 21, 2017 Author #3 Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, DieChecker said: First thought that came to me... How do we know that these new older tools belonged to the Aborigines? Could they not have belonged to an earlier people? Is there indications that link this excavation to other later dated excavations? I'll read the article and see if they say. this is an interesting article on the DNA interpretation of Mulga Man, the oldest known Australian human remains. the latest DNA technology on Mulga Man confirms there were no people in Australia before the Aborigines http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2016-06-07/dna-confirms-aboriginal-people-as-the-first-australians/7481360 Edited July 21, 2017 by Ozfactor forgot to add the link 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieChecker Posted July 21, 2017 #4 Share Posted July 21, 2017 5 hours ago, Ozfactor said: this is an interesting article on the DNA interpretation of Mulga Man, the oldest known Australian human remains. the latest DNA technology on Mulga Man confirms there were no people in Australia before the Aborigines http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2016-06-07/dna-confirms-aboriginal-people-as-the-first-australians/7481360 Or, perhaps, that they died out before he got there? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieChecker Posted July 21, 2017 #5 Share Posted July 21, 2017 8 hours ago, DieChecker said: I'll read the article and see if they say. Didn't say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InconceivableThoughts Posted July 21, 2017 #6 Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) It's amazing how easily these time frames are pushed around....seems like we can't ever be to sure of the history of this planet. Mark Twain 'What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so.' Edited July 21, 2017 by InconceivableThoughts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codenwarra Posted July 24, 2017 #7 Share Posted July 24, 2017 (edited) Ho hum, yet another claim of rewriting history books when the actual books were non-committal. Edited July 24, 2017 by Codenwarra It cut off part of my post, not the first time either 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Attila911us Posted July 27, 2017 #8 Share Posted July 27, 2017 I just read the article that claims to prove that the Aborigines were the first to inhabit the continent of Australia. I found it lacking in actual evidence that this was the case . The DNA evidence seems to be sketchy. Are there any other articles that shine more light on the subject? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codenwarra Posted July 29, 2017 #9 Share Posted July 29, 2017 On 7/28/2017 at 0:45 AM, Attila911us said: I just read the article that claims to prove that the Aborigines were the first to inhabit the continent of Australia. I found it lacking in actual evidence that this was the case . The DNA evidence seems to be sketchy. Are there any other articles that shine more light on the subject? There are some radiometric dates (not carbon dates) that indicate this sort of time. I forget the details but it was announced earlier this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now