Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3
Gingitsune

Trump and the Russians

46 posts in this topic

12 hours ago, Farmer77 said:

The leading theory is that he just isnt too bright. :P

Plus he looks like he bathed in Cheetos dust.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
On ‎7‎/‎21‎/‎2017 at 3:19 AM, Lilly said:

 People feel their government isn't even remotely concerned with their needs.

That's because our government isn't concerned with our needs, and hasn't been for along time. Whether it be Republican or Democrat, there is an agenda in place, and it has absolutely nothing to do with helping you, the American people. (IMO)

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎9‎/‎8‎/‎2017 at 4:58 PM, and then said:

  You should really get your facts straight, you're embarrassing yourself at this late date.

This is exactly what our politicians want, confused and ignorant citizens, not ever knowing what is really going on at the end of the day as far as our government is concerned. It is easier to control a society that is misinformed and left out of the loop than it is to control a correctly informed society. And if Americans were correctly informed about everything going on in the government then it is my belief we would have more control over our politicians, what they do and how they act. But unfortunately this is not the case, nor most likely ever will be. It seems to me that we are living in a society that no longer seeks out the Truth. And if we are not seeking Truth then we have become a willfully ignorant people. Willfully ignorant people are Dangerous, and in my opinion are the reason our government is out of control. We as a society need to come together and be of one mind and of one accord if we want to have any chance of saving our country. (IMO)

Edited by Ogbin
5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russia Wanted Trump As President And It Got Him. Now What Does America Do?

,HuffPost•                  November 22, 2017

On Jan. 6, 2017, the U.S. intelligence community released a declassified version of its analysis finding that Russian President Vladimir Putin had not only interfered in the 2016 election, but had actively tried to help Trump. Among the tools Russia used was the theft of emails from the campaign of Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, and their release through Russia-friendly WikiLeaks.

Trump campaign foreign policy aide George Papadopoulos detailed in filings associated with his guilty plea agreement how Russians in April 2016 were offering the campaign emails damaging to Clinton. Emails between the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., and a former business partner show that the younger Trump was eager to see the supposedly incriminating information in advance of a Trump Tower meeting. Trump Jr. later traded messages with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about his father’s exploitation of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. On Oct. 12, 2016, after Assange suggested that the GOP nominee help publicize the latest batch of stolen emails, Trump himself sent a tweet praising WikiLeaks just 15 minutes later.

On May 9, 2017, after three months of complaining about the FBI’s Russia probe, Trump fired the agency’s director, James Comey. The reason initially stated was that Comey had mishandled an investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. But the very next day, Trump reportedly told Russia’s foreign minister and its U.S. ambassador during an Oval Office visit that he’d fired Comey to block the probe. Trump again cited the Russia investigation as a reason for firing Comey in an interview with NBC News on May 11. That firing led quickly to Mueller’s appointment to take over the investigation.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-wanted-trump-president-got-100030401.html
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. Those dirty rooskis. 

Seth Rich stole the DNC emails and gave em to Wikileaks. Case closed.  

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is wiki leaks pro russian?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Mr.United_Nations said:

How is wiki leaks pro russian?

There are some possible connections there. The fact that they gave Assange his own TV show kinda shows that they are at least operating from the same ideological place on some level. 

Edited by Farmer77

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They just keep getting caught not telling the truth. If there was never anything to hide, they're sure acting as if there was.

 It's like a kid with a cookie jar.

Did you eat all the cookies?

What are you talking about? I don't know about any cookies. I don't even know you. 

Ok...I know you, but I've never been to your house.

Ok...I've been to your house, but I've never been in the kitchen.

Ok...I've been in the kitchen, but I didn't touch the cookie jar.

Ok...I touched the cookie jar, but I only took one cookie out and I didn't eat it.

Ok...I ate the cookie, but I didn't eat all the cookies.

Ok...I ate all the cookies, but I didn't break the jar.

Ok...I ate all the cookies and broke the jar...but what about John Dillinger? 

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ChaosRose said:

They just keep getting caught not telling the truth. If there was never anything to hide, they're sure acting as if there was.

 It's like a kid with a cookie jar.

Did you eat all the cookies?

What are you talking about? I don't know about any cookies. I don't even know you. 

Ok...I know you, but I've never been to your house.

Ok...I've been to your house, but I've never been in the kitchen.

Ok...I've been in the kitchen, but I didn't touch the cookie jar.

Ok...I touched the cookie jar, but I only took one cookie out and I didn't eat it.

Ok...I ate the cookie, but I didn't eat all the cookies.

Ok...I ate all the cookies, but I didn't break the jar.

Ok...I ate all the cookies and broke the jar...but what about John Dillinger? 

Haha this sums the situation up perfectly !

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Farmer77 said:

Haha this sums the situation up perfectly !

I disagree.  The last part wouldn't read "but what about John Dillinger?".  Given the Loyalty on show it would probably go like this, "What about Junior?  He hasn't been going to school!  And by the way, Mum, ......I know things about Dad."

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Eldorado said:

I disagree.  The last part wouldn't read "but what about John Dillinger?".  Given the Loyalty on show it would probably go like this, "What about Junior?  He hasn't been going to school!  And by the way, Mum, ......I know things about Dad."

:lol: Beautiful !!!!!! 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a kick outta this.... :D

DGin_I2m_Xs_AEXFTL.jpg

 

 

 

 

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Secret Correspondence Between Donald Trump Jr. and WikiLeaks

The transparency organization asked the president’s son for his cooperation—in sharing its work, in contesting the results of the election, and in arranging for Julian Assange to be Australia’s ambassador to the United States.


Peter Nicholls / Reuters

JULIA IOFFE  NOV 13, 2017

The messages, obtained by The Atlantic, were also turned over by Trump Jr.’s lawyers to congressional investigators. They are part of a long—and largely one-sided—correspondence between WikiLeaks and the president’s son that continued until at least July 2017. The messages show WikiLeaks, a radical transparency organization that the American intelligence community believes was chosen by the Russian government to disseminate the information it had hacked, actively soliciting Trump Jr.’s cooperation. WikiLeaks made a series of increasingly bold requests, including asking for Trump’s tax returns, urging the Trump campaign on Election Day to reject the results of the election as rigged, and requesting that the president-elect tell Australia to appoint Julian Assange ambassador to the United States.
........


WikiLeaks played a pivotal role in the presidential campaign. In July 2016, on the first day of the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks released emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee's servers that spring. The emails showed DNC officials denigrating Bernie Sanders, renewing tensions on the eve of Clinton’s acceptance of the nomination. On October 7, less than an hour after the Washington Post released the Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump bragged about sexually assaulting women, Wikileaks released emails that hackers had pilfered from the personal email account of Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like the "collusion" was between a pro HRC FBI agent, his mistress, fusion gps, the DNC, the DOJ and the msm to doll up a now discredited charge against President Trump in the unlikely event (their words) that Trump should win. Anyone that is still buying into this certainly has not been watching the hearings in Congress because memebers of Congress are no longer buying it. Not after getting their hands on the 10,000 text messages from that now demoted FBI agent. 

But it is a free society and people can believe what ever they like. I prefer getting as much, if not all information as I can before drawing a final conclusion. Others, like jumping the gun or as some say, having a guilty verdict and then trying to find "evidence" to back up their bias conclusion. Which is not how our justice system is suppose to work but yea ok. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump and Pence were warned in January that CIA had proof Putin directed election hacks: report

Travis Gettys        14 DEC 2017 

But the Washington Post reported Thursday that Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., CIA Director John Brennan and FBI Director James B. Comey met with Trump on Jan. 6 to report the CIA “had captured Putin’s specific instructions on the operation.”

The officials had already briefed President Barack Obama and members of Congress about the intercepts, and they expected the president-elect to throw them out of Trump Tower.


https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/trump-and-pence-were-warned-in-january-that-cia-had-proof-putin-directed-election-hacks-report/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll give a huge donation to a charity of your choice if there's actual evidence presented that proves that *Trump* colluded with the new boogeyman to overturn Hillary's predestined ascension to the crown. I'll send a Ben Franklin to a good cause if Trump is impeached and removed for this. I put my money where my mouth is. Any takers?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Paranormal Panther said:

I'll give a huge donation to a charity of your choice if there's actual evidence presented that proves that *Trump* colluded with the new boogeyman to overturn Hillary's predestined ascension to the crown. I'll send a Ben Franklin to a good cause if Trump is impeached and removed for this. I put my money where my mouth is. Any takers?

OK you're on... and my "charity" of choice is... Wait for it... The Clinton Foundation :santa:

:lol:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lemieux said:

OK you're on... and my "charity" of choice is... Wait for it... The Clinton Foundation :santa:

:lol:

I hope that you're talking about *George* Clinton. Your charity would be a good name for a funk band.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Is it treasonous that Trump Jr. met with the Russian lawyer in Trump Tower? I agree with Bannon "treasonous" conclusion. Hillary Clinton is a victim in e-mail hacking event. Her money (e-mail) was stolen by a thief(hackers). Trump's team tried to get the material from the thief to hurt Hillary Clinton. Seeking Russian's help to deal with American, that's treason. But Trump is the candidate of the Feds(FBI). What they want is not justice and law but a dictate power. Under their terror reign, even their extreme right ally has to bow down. Steve Bannon now should realize what kind of person is Trump that he helped to steal the president seat. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, katsung47 said:


Is it treasonous that Trump Jr. met with the Russian lawyer in Trump Tower? I agree with Bannon "treasonous" conclusion. Hillary Clinton is a victim in e-mail hacking event. Her money (e-mail) was stolen by a thief(hackers). Trump's team tried to get the material from the thief to hurt Hillary Clinton. Seeking Russian's help to deal with American, that's treason. But Trump is the candidate of the Feds(FBI). What they want is not justice and law but a dictate power. Under their terror reign, even their extreme right ally has to bow down. Steve Bannon now should realize what kind of person is Trump that he helped to steal the president seat. 

And the other choice Is Hilary to have a war with Russia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.