papageorge1 Posted August 27, 2017 #51 Share Posted August 27, 2017 8 minutes ago, Shill said: They had previously reported an attempted break-in and suspicious people poking around. So, the camera set up (and paranoia) seems justified. How do you know that? That isn't part of any information found in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shill Posted August 28, 2017 #52 Share Posted August 28, 2017 It's on the owners FB page which she has set to public. At least when I saw it. It was where she first posted the video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted August 28, 2017 #53 Share Posted August 28, 2017 2 hours ago, Shill said: It's on the owners FB page which she has set to public. I can't find it. Can you give me a clue? 2 hours ago, Shill said: It's on the owners FB page which she has set to public. You only posted this two hours ago. You didn't check if it's still there? I'll admit to being a little suspicious at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozemonkey Posted August 28, 2017 #54 Share Posted August 28, 2017 It does appear to strut/swagger like a little elf with attitude.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shill Posted August 29, 2017 #55 Share Posted August 29, 2017 On 8/28/2017 at 11:41 AM, papageorge1 said: I can't find it. Can you give me a clue? You only posted this two hours ago. You didn't check if it's still there? I'll admit to being a little suspicious at this point. https://www.facebook.com/breanna.mckenzie.75/videos/1380720862041768/ Here. She posted this to her page before it went to the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted August 29, 2017 #56 Share Posted August 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Shill said: https://www.facebook.com/breanna.mckenzie.75/videos/1380720862041768/ Here. She posted this to her page before it went to the news. Thank you for that as it gives us more information to consider but, unless I missed something, I didn't see her telling us why they set up surveillance but I did see where they videoed a human trespasser. And she further claimed there is a big difference between this (ghostly?)image and what a regular person would look like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesspy Posted August 31, 2017 #57 Share Posted August 31, 2017 It is a weather balloon. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calibeliever Posted August 31, 2017 #58 Share Posted August 31, 2017 2 hours ago, jesspy said: It is a weather balloon. Filled with swamp gas 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissJatti Posted September 9, 2017 #59 Share Posted September 9, 2017 Thats no ghost that is a arab man running lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freetoroam Posted September 9, 2017 #60 Share Posted September 9, 2017 On 8/28/2017 at 10:42 PM, Boozemonkey said: It does appear to strut/swagger like a little elf with attitude.. Lots of teens do that, the only mystery here is who is this man/woman/ transgender, ( I know!!! just doing the political correct thingy) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlitterRose Posted September 10, 2017 #61 Share Posted September 10, 2017 On 8/25/2017 at 5:54 AM, SecretSanta said: I got it! It's a tumbleweed! ...drifting along with the tumbling tumbleweeds.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Only Posted September 10, 2017 #62 Share Posted September 10, 2017 (edited) On 8/26/2017 at 7:05 PM, stereologist said: Unlike those that throw out pretend numbers and always side with the paranormal my thinking is rational. I did not say no chance. This is nothing more than something passing in front of a camera. Why would anyone think it is a ghost? What are you on about? I say "90% sure" all of the time, to others, and in my head, meaning I'm pretty sure, but I don't wanna say 100%. That is all the person was saying. 90% sure they weren't trying to stun and distract you with their mystical mathematical powers that no believer in ghosts could dare to attain! They're saying their opinion is that they are pretty damn sure it's a ghost. Take that for what you will, but I don't see why you're trying to portray them as some pseudo-intellect for saying something fair and honest. Man, this place never changes. edit: Also, I'm really almost urged to make a GIF of that camera video, but with Edited September 10, 2017 by _Only Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 10, 2017 #63 Share Posted September 10, 2017 4 hours ago, _Only said: What are you on about? I say "90% sure" all of the time, to others, and in my head, meaning I'm pretty sure, but I don't wanna say 100%. That is all the person was saying. 90% sure they weren't trying to stun and distract you with their mystical mathematical powers that no believer in ghosts could dare to attain! They're saying their opinion is that they are pretty damn sure it's a ghost. Take that for what you will, but I don't see why you're trying to portray them as some pseudo-intellect for saying something fair and honest. Man, this place never changes. edit: Also, I'm really almost urged to make a GIF of that camera video, but with People use numbers for different purposes. The manner in which you say 90% is not the same as other posters. The other poster attempts to pretend that the information has some quality that it does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TripGun Posted October 20, 2017 #64 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Potato cams always catch the best ghost and unexplained footage. Anybody know where I can get a 1.3 megapixel CCTV camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Posted October 22, 2017 #65 Share Posted October 22, 2017 On 10/09/2017 at 4:50 PM, _Only said: What are you on about? I say "90% sure" all of the time, to others, and in my head, meaning I'm pretty sure, but I don't wanna say 100%. That is all the person was saying. 90% sure they weren't trying to stun and distract you with their mystical mathematical powers that no believer in ghosts could dare to attain! They're saying their opinion is that they are pretty damn sure it's a ghost. Take that for what you will, but I don't see why you're trying to portray them as some pseudo-intellect for saying something fair and honest. Man, this place never changes. edit: Also, I'm really almost urged to make a GIF of that camera video, but with That is not the way the pap-meter works. The pap-meter is an opinion based complex algorithm which takes all pertinent information into account in order to produce a percentage value of paranormal possibility. To brush it of as a simple ‘90% means pretty sure’ is a gross generalization and an insult to papageorge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted October 22, 2017 #66 Share Posted October 22, 2017 On 9/10/2017 at 2:50 AM, _Only said: What are you on about? I say "90% sure" all of the time, to others, and in my head, meaning I'm pretty sure, but I don't wanna say 100%. That is all the person was saying. 90% sure they weren't trying to stun and distract you with their mystical mathematical powers that no believer in ghosts could dare to attain! They're saying their opinion is that they are pretty damn sure it's a ghost. Take that for what you will, but I don't see why you're trying to portray them as some pseudo-intellect for saying something fair and honest. Man, this place never changes. edit: Also, I'm really almost urged to make a GIF of that camera video, but with Ya, but I get bored without them actually. 11 minutes ago, Timonthy said: That is not the way the pap-meter works. The pap-meter is an opinion based complex algorithm which takes all pertinent information into account in order to produce a percentage value of paranormal possibility. To brush it of as a simple ‘90% means pretty sure’ is a gross generalization and an insult to papageorge. It's a best judgment estimate that considers everything I know about the subject and the case, not a mathematical algorithm. And it's spelled Papameter, btw. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Posted October 23, 2017 #67 Share Posted October 23, 2017 On 21/10/2017 at 3:19 AM, TripGun said: Potato cams always catch the best ghost and unexplained footage. Anybody know where I can get a 1.3 megapixel CCTV camera? I think I have and old webcam in a box in a garage somewhere if you want it? Guaranteed paranormal activity will inevitably follow. Maybe I should set it up facing towards the city. I’ll surely catch lots of strange lights and bird UFOs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Wade Posted October 23, 2017 #68 Share Posted October 23, 2017 On 8/25/2017 at 6:17 AM, Still Waters said: A Clovis family dinner was interrupted Tuesday night by an unexpected guest — one they don’t think is of this world. “As soon as I saw it, my hair stood up… I’ve never seen anything like that before,” Breanna Hernandez said. The Hernandez family saw something they can’t explain captured by their home security cameras in Clovis. “My husband happened to look over right when the image popped up,” Hernandez said. http://krqe.com/2017/08/23/creepy-image-caught-gliding-across-clovis-surveillance-camera/ I agree with some of the others. It's very subjective, but still discussion worthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofGardener Posted October 23, 2017 #69 Share Posted October 23, 2017 Hmm..... That doesn't look like somebody walking along the pavement, to my mind. It looks like something very small, floating past the camera quite closely. (so close that the camera can't focus on it properly). Insect of some sort ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluearmy78 Posted October 25, 2017 #70 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Fake, so obviously, not worth even debating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofGardener Posted October 25, 2017 #71 Share Posted October 25, 2017 (edited) 34 minutes ago, bluearmy78 said: Fake, so obviously, not worth even debating. That's debatable I don't see any reason to describe it as a "fake" ? (in the sense of a deliberate contrived fraud). Edited October 25, 2017 by RoofGardener 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now